BOOSTING CALCULUS UNDERSTANDING: THE IMPACT OF SELF-EXPLANATION PROMPTS ON LEARNING
Angkasa Widodo , Faculty of Education, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, IndonesiaAbstract
This study investigates the impact of self-explanation prompts on enhancing calculus understanding and learning outcomes. Self-explanation, a cognitive strategy where learners generate explanations for concepts or problem-solving steps, has been shown to improve comprehension and retention. In this research, we examine how the integration of self-explanation prompts in calculus instruction influences students' ability to grasp complex mathematical concepts. Through a combination of pre-and post-assessments, as well as qualitative feedback, the study assesses how self-explanation facilitates deeper understanding, error correction, and problem-solving skills. The findings suggest that students who engage with self-explanation prompts demonstrate improved performance, stronger conceptual grasp, and greater confidence in their ability to tackle calculus problems. The study underscores the potential of self-explanation prompts as an effective tool in calculus education.
Keywords
Self-explanation, Calculus learning, Cognitive strategies
References
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145-182.
Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 380-386.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111-139.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angkasa Widodo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.