Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue09-12

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EASTERN AND SOUTH-EAST ASIAN COUNTRIES

Elyorbek Otajonov , Institute for Research of the Youth Problems and Training Prospective Personnel foundation doctoral student, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article examines the implementation of administrative reform in East Asian nations, which is an essential aspect of public administration and policy-making. The paper explores the fundamental methodologies used during these transformational processes, as well as the successful and unsuccessful examples of change in various countries in the region. Furthermore, it examines the impact of cultural, historical, and political factors on the course of these reforms.

Due to the increasing complexity of public administration in Asia, it is essential to conduct a comparative analysis of the challenges faced by governments in these regions. In order to address this issue, this paper will examine selected initiatives of New Public Management (NPM) in various countries of South and Southeast Asia and analyse the cross-national differences. For this purpose, we selected four countries from South and Southeast Asia for our case studies: Singapore, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. This paper examines the complex interplay between various contextual factors, such as historical political events, party dynamics, macroeconomic circumstances, state-building traditions, the influence of international development agencies (IDAs), and the status of civil society on the nature and effect of NPM (New Public Management) initiatives in these nations.

Our analysis indicates that these contextual elements significantly contributed to the varying degrees of success achieved by Singapore and Malaysia in implementing NPM compared to Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, where the reforms did not produce the desired outcomes.

Keywords

Administrative Reform, East Asia, Methodology

References

Fukuyama, Francis (2014), "Trust: Social Virtues and the Path to Prosperity", Moscow: Progress.

Lee, Edward M. (2011), "Culture and Modern Governance in Asia", Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Maggie, D. (2017). “A Comparative Analysis of Administrative Reforms in East Asia.” Journal of Public Administration, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 115–138.

Kim, H. S. (2019). “Confucianism and Governance in Korea.” Seoul: Korea Institute of Management.

Lee, E.W. and Haque, S ‘The New Public Management Reform and Governance in Asian NICs: A Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore’, Governance 19(4): . (2006) 605–26.

Lan Z. and Rosenbloom D.H. ‘Editorial’, Public Administration Review 52(6): 1. (1992) p. 45

Osborne D. and Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: A Plume Book. (1993)

Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2000)

Pollitt, C. ‘Justification by Works or by Faith? Evaluating the New Public Management’,

Evaluation 9(2). 133–54.

Hughes, O.E. Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J. and Walsh, P. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

Kelly, G., Mulgan, G. and Muers, S. (2002) ‘Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform’, Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, London, available at: www.strategy.gov.uk.htm

Lee, E.W. and Haque, S. (2006) ‘The New Public Management Reform and Governance in Asian NICs: A Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore’, Governance 19(4): 605–26.

Lee, E.W. and Haque, S. ‘The New Public Management Reform and Governance in Asian NICs: A Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore’, Governance 19(4): 605–26.

Jones, D.S. Performance Measurement and Budgetary Reform in the Singapore Civil Service’, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management 13(4): 485–511.

Painter, M. ‘The Politics of Administrative Reform in East and South East Asia: From Gridlock to Continuous Self-improvement’, Governance 17(3): 2004. 361–86.

Turner, M. ‘Choosing Items from the Menu: New Public Management in Southeast Asia’, International Journal of Public Administration 25(12): 493–512.

Koi, G. and Ooi, G.L. (eds) (2000) State–Society Relations in Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Siddiquee, N.A. (2002) ‘Administrative Reform in Malaysia: Recent Trends and Development’, Asian Journal of Political Science 10(3): 105–30.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Elyorbek Otajonov. (2024). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM IN EASTERN AND SOUTH-EAST ASIAN COUNTRIES. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 6(09), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue09-12