Articles
| Open Access |
DOI: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CHINESE AND RUSSIAN SCIENTISTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING THE SCO
Rakhmatulla Nurimbetov , Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Political Science, Tashkent state university of oriental studies, Tashkent, UzbekistanAbstract
This article explores how Chinese and Russian scientists study the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and compares their approaches. It looks at how their views have changed as the SCO has evolved, especially given the shifting landscape of international relations.
Chinese and Russian researchers have developed unique perspectives on the SCO's role and future. Initially, both countries had similar views on the organization's goals and functions. However, recent changes have led to different expectations and priorities. Chinese scholars often see the SCO as a key player in regional economic cooperation, fitting into China's larger Belt and Road Initiative. On the other hand, Russian experts emphasize the SCO's importance in strategic and security matters, reflecting Russia's aim to balance Western influence.
The article highlights these growing differences, providing insights into how they might affect the SCO's future. Understanding these perspectives helps us see the broader impact of the SCO on regional and global stability. This comparison shows the complex relationship between national interests and academic research in shaping the future of international organizations.
Keywords
Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Sino-Russian relations, Central Asian geopolitics
References
Chjao Xuashen.Kitay, Sentralnaya Aziya i Shanxayskaya organizatsiya sotrudnichestva // Moskovskiy sentr Karnegi. Rabochiye materiali. 2005. №5. S.50.
Pan Guan. Chto takoye "shanxayskiy dux" 27.11.2008. http://www.infoshos.ru; Gao Xansyun. Vigoda i ravenstvo. Pochemu teoriya "Shanxayskogo duxa" obladayet moshnoy jiznennoy siloy. https://rg.ru/2020/11/08/pochemu-teoriia-shanhajskogo-duha-obladaet-moshchnoj-zhiznennoj-siloj.html;. The undying importance of the 'Shanghai Spirit'. By Zhang Xin. https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d774d3263444f77457a6333566d54/share_p.html; /
Pan Dapen. Rol SHOS vo vneshnepoliticheskoy strategii Kitaya. 01.10.2020. https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/rol-shos-vo-vneshnepoliticheskoy-strategii-kitay
SCO: A New Model for Close, Inclusive International Relations. View of Wang Xiaoquan, Executive deputy director, Secretary General Belt and Road Research Center under Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. https://russiancouncil.ru/news/eksperty-iz-rossii-i-kitaya-obsudili-rol-shos-v-regionalnom-upravlenii/?sphrase_id=73178665#detail
New Asian security concept will build a world of peace and prosperity. 2019-06-16/ By Li Haidong, professor of the Institute of International Relations//China Foreign Affairs University (CFAU). http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2019-06/16/content_9531409.htm
Chjao Xuashen：Sovremennie podxodi Kitaya k Shanxayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva // https://rus.sectsco.org/20220507/835611.html
N. Lu, Sh. Lu, M. Xuan. Sotrudnichestvo Kitaya s Rossiyey i stranami Sentralnoy Azii v formate «Odnogo poyasa, odnogo puti» kak faktor razvitiya SHOS. // Vestnik mejdunarodnix organizatsiy. T. 13. №3. S. 113–127 Li. Sin. Problemi ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva SHOS, «Ekonomicheskogo poyasa Shelkovogo puti» i Yevraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza. // Jurnal “Mejdunarodnaya analitika”. № 2 (2015). S. 57-60.
A.I.Nikitin. Politika bezopasnosti SHOS v usloviyax menyayushixsya form, xaraktera, geografii i masshtaba traditsionnix i netraditsionnix vizovov i ugroz. Vistupleniye na Forume SHOS-2023
//https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4484372 M.L.Titarenko. Rossiya i Kitay: strategicheskoye partnerstvo i vizovi vremeni. M.L. Titarenko. — MID «FORUM», 2014. - 224 s. M.L.Titarenko. Rossiya i yee aziatskiye partneri v globaliziruyushemsya mire. // Strategicheskoye sotrudnichestvo: problemi i perspektivi / M.L. Titarenko. - M. : ID «FORUM», 2012. — 544 s.; Yu.M. Galenovich, Rossiya — Kitay: shest dogovorov. M., 2003. S.408; Lukin A. V. Rossiya i SHOS // Analiticheskiye zapiski. Nauchno-koordinatsionnogo soveta po mejdunarodnim issledovaniyam MGIMO (U) MID Rossii. Vipusk 2(4) Fevral 2005. A.V.Lukin. Shanxayskaya organizatsiya sotrudnichestva : problemi i perspektivi // Mejdunarodnaya jizn. - 2004. - №3. - S. Rossiya i Kitay: chetire veka vzaimodeystviya. Istoriya, sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivi razvitiya rossiysko-kitayskix otnosheniy / Pod red. A.V. Lukina. M.: «Ves Mir», 2013. C. 704; Klimenko A.F. Voyennie aspekti sotrudnichestva v formate SHOS. // V sbornike: DOKLADЫ IDV RAN - 2011. Moskva, 2012. S. 180-194.
D.V.Gordiyenko. Shanxayskaya organizatsiya sotrudnichestva kak ploshadka dlya dialoga po voprosam regionalnoy bezopasnosti. // Jurnal Natsionalnie interesi: prioriteti i bezopasnost. № 37 (2015) Str.44-66. Nikitina Yu.A. ODKB i SHOS kak modeli vzaimodeystviya v sfere regionalnoy bezopasnosti / Yu.A. Nikitina // Indeks bezopasnosti. - 2011. - № 2 (97). - S. 45-53. D.A.Borisov. Evolyutsiya politiki bezopasnosti Shanxayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva (1996–2010 gg.) : avtoref. … diss. kand. istor. nauk. - Tomsk: Tomskiy gosudarstvenniy universitet, 2011. - 27 s.
Memorandum o vzaimoponimanii po voprosam sotrudnichestva i vzaimodeystviya mejdu RATS SHOS, ATTS SNG i Sekretariatom ODKB.https://antiterror.odkb-csto.org/int_organizations/RATS%20SHOS-ATC%20SNG-CSTO/memorandum/
V.V.Voronovich. Evolyutsiya Shanxayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva v kontekste formirovaniya aziatskoy sistemi bezopasnosti. // Jurnal mejdunarodnogo prava i mejdunarodnix otnosheniy. №2., 2007. https://elib.bsu.by/handle /; M.G.Shilina. Shanxayskaya organizatsiya sotrudnichestva kak format politicheskogo i ekonomicheskogo vzaimodeystviya gosudarstv: realii i perspektivi. // Jurnal Biznes. Obshestvo. Vlast. № 21 (2014) Str. 41-61.; M.G.Shilina. SHOS kak institutsionalnaya osnova mejgosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo vzaimodeystviya v Yevrazii: osobennosti i preimushestva. // Sbornik: Aktualnie problemi sovremennogo mejdunarodnogo prava: materiali XIV Mejdunarodnogo kongressa "Blishenkovskiye chteniya" Moskva: RUDN 2018.; V.B.Mantusov. Subregionalnaya gruppa SHOS. Analiz problem, vozmojnostey i perspektiv razvitiya. Monografiya. // Nauchnaya kniga. 2010. S.86. G.V.Podbiralina, T.Ye.Migaleva. Ekonomicheskiye interesi Kitaya i Rossii v Shanxayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva. // Mejdunarodnaya torgovlya i torgovaya politika. 2015;(2):83-93. https://mttp.rea.ru/jour/article/view/17/18.
Karaganov S. Ot povorota na Vostok k Bolshoy Yevrazii. // Jurnal Mejdunarodnaya jizn. 2017 (5).; Kortunov A.V. SHOS - kamen, otvergnutiy stroitelyami novoy Yevrazii? 14.05.2018. https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/shos-kamen-otvergnutyy-stroitelyami-novoy-evrazii/; Luzyanin S.G. Rossiya – Kitay: formirovaniye obnovlennogo mira: monografiya /otv. red. akademik B.C. Myasnikov. – M.: Izdatelstvo «Ves Mir», 2018. 328 s.; Lukin A.V., Yakunin V.I. Puti i poyasa Yevrazii. Natsionalnie i mejdunarodnie proyekti razvitiya na Yevraziyskom prostranstve i perspektivi ix sopryajeniya. – M.: Ves Mir, 2019. – 416 s.; V.A.Lukin. SHOS mogla bi sigrat vajnuyu rol v sfere sopryajeniya Ekonomicheskogo poyasa Shelkovogo puti i YEAES. Agentstvo Sinxua. 2018-06-05.; Safronova Ye.I. Rossiysko-kitayskiy dialog i «Bolshoye yevraziyskoye partnerstvo»: novaya ideologiya otnosheniy? // Problemi Dalnego Vostoka. 2019. № 4. – S. 174- 178; Larin A.G. Ekonomicheskiy poyas Shelkovogo puti»: ekonomicheskoye soderjaniye, struktura, ideologiya // Noviy Shelkoviy put i yego znacheniye dlya Rossii / IDV RAN. M.: DeLi plyus. 2016. S. 38–57; Kulinsev Yu.V., Syutsze T. Transaziatsko-yevropeyskoye ekonomicheskoye partnerstvo kak variant sopryajeniya YEAES i EPSHP // Problemi Dalnego Vostoka. – 2018. № 2. – S. 89-98.; .Kulinsev Yu.V., Petrovskiy V.Ye. , Larionova A., Chay Yuy (KNR), Van Chensin (KNR), Szyan Szin (KNR). Sopryajeniye YEAES i IPP: problemi i perspektivi // Analiticheskaya zapiska 29/2020. RSMD, KAON. 2020. – S. 1-15.; Kulinsev Yu.V. Perspektivnie vektori razvitiya SHOS v kontekste stroitelstva Bolshogo yevraziyskogo partnerstva // Yevraziyskoye prostranstvo: novie vektori i prioriteti / otv.red.-sost. V.A.Matveyev. – M.: IDV RAN, 2020. – S. 43-53; T.V. Bordachev, A.V. Kazakova, A.S. Skriba. Instituti dlya mira v Yevrazii. // Jurnal “Vestnik mejdunarodnix organizatsiy: obrazovaniye, nauka, novaya ekonomika». 2016. T. 11. № 2. S. 24–39.; Bordachev T. V., Pyatachkova A. S. Konsepsiya «Bolshoy Yevrazii» v povorote Rossii na Vostok. // Jurnal “Vestnik mejdunarodnix organizatsiy: obrazovaniye, nauka, novaya ekonomika», 2018. T. 13. № 3. S. 33–51. ; Kurilev K.P., Barannik M.A., Stanis D.V. SHOS kak nesushiy element konstruksii Bolshoy Yevrazii. POLIS. T.3., №8, 2020. S. 627-632
T.Bordachyov. Rossiya, Bolьshaya Yevraziya i sovremennaya mejdunarodnaya politika. 8 fevralya 2024 // https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/comments/rossiya-bolshaya-evraziya-i-sovremennaya-mezhdunarodnaya-politika/
V xode Samarkandskogo sammita SHOS v 2022 godu glav gosudarstv-chlenov organizatsii prinyali resheniye o sovershenstvovanii deyatelnosti SHOS.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rakhmatulla Nurimbetov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.