★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Social Sciences OPEN ACCESS

Сlassification Of Sentences In Comparison Content With The Participation In Prefix比 Bǐ In Chinese Language

Adiba Botir Qizi Makhamadtoirova
Lecturer, Department Of “Chinese Language And Literature”, Tashkent State University Of Oriental Studies, Uzbekistan
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue08-16
tajssei 2020
VOL. 2 / NO. 08 AUGUST
FULL TEXT PP. 110-123
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 2
ISSUE 08
YEAR 2020
PAGES 110-123
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

In modern Chinese, there are many ways to express differences or similarities between things and
events, situations and qualities, and also levels, to add they are mainly used to compare differences
in high or low a situation. At the same time, it helps to make the speech stylistically brief and fluent.
The words in the context of comparison are expressed in Chinese by the term 比较句 bǐjiào jù. If we
look at the analysis of this word, 比较 bǐjiào compares 句 jù which gives meaning of the sentence.
There is no equivalent of the words analogy in Chinese language, into Uzbek, all of which are called
compression 比较句 bǐjiào jù.
In Chinese language there are many types of expressions of differences and similarities between
things and events, states and qualities, and levels, and the prefix 比 bǐ is used to express the
difference, high, or low of qualities and levels. It is mainly used to compare differences between two
people, or two objects, and also two levels of situations. This article is devoted to the classification of
sentences with the presence of the prefix 比 bǐ, the expression of sentences with the presence of
the prefix 比 bǐ, the specific construction models of these constructions, the functions of the
sentence.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Compare comparison, analogy,
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Abdurahmonov G.A., Shoabdurahmonov.
  2. Sh.Sh., Hojiev A.P. (1976) Uzbek grammar.
  3. II. Syntax. – Tashkent: Fan. – p. 450 p. (In
  4. Uzbek)
  5. Gorelov V.I. (1982) Grammar of the
  6. Chinese language. – Moscow:
  7. Enlightenment. – p. 278 p. (In Russian)
  8. Dragunov A.A. (1962). The grammar
  9. system of modern Chinese. – Leningrad. –
  10. p. 250. (In Russian)
  11. Zadoenko TK, Juan Shuin. (1986) The
  12. basics of the Chinese language. – Moscow.
  13. Nauka. –p. 245. (In Russian)
  14. Morozova M.I. (1977) Logic and syntax of
  15. comparison. Grammar and norm. –
  16. Moscow: Nauka. –p. 280. (In Russian)
  17. Liu Yuehua waiting. (2001) Practical
  18. Modern Chinese Grammar. – Beijing:
  19. Commercial Press. – p. 840. (In Chinese)
  20. Li Dejin, Cheng Meizhen. (2008) Practical
  21. Chinese for Foreigners. – Beijing: Beijing
  22. Language and Culture University Press. –
  23. p. 652. (In Chinese)
  24. Dai Xuemei, Zhang Ruoying. (1999) 300
  25. Practical Chinese Grammar. – Beijing: New
  26. World Publishing. – p. 240. (In Chinese)
  27. Ding Shengshu. (1996) Modern Chinese
  28. Grammar Speech. – Beijing: Commercial
  29. Press. – p. 120. (In Chinese)
  30. Liu Haobo. (2013) A Syntactic Analysis of
  31. the Bi Comparative Construction. –
  32. Sichuan: Sichuan International Studies
  33. University Master Degree Thesis. – p. 78.
  34. (In Chinese)
  35. Ma Zhen. (1986) A Tentative Study of the
  36. Substitution Rule of Comparison Items of
  37. Bibi Sentences. Chinese Language. – pp. 6-
  38. (In Chinese)
  39. Shang Ping. (2006) A Review of
  40. Comparative Sentence System Research.
  41. Language and Character Applications. –
  42. pp. 3-5. (In Chinese)
  43. 苗东霞编煮. (2010) HSK 考前强化语法. ––
  44. Beijing: Central Compilation and
  45. Translation Press. – pp. 475页.
  46. Yang Jie, Du Xin. (2012). 新HSK模拟题集.
  47. (4/5). – Beijing: Central Compilation and
  48. Translation Press. – pp. 414