Political text and discourse is a combination of perceiving the life in terms of conceptual-discourse methods, standards of scientific researches and activities. The primary form of analyzing a text identifies hidden factors of its political and ideological objectives as they reflect socio-political changes turning to setting the target for investigating, evaluating and selecting. This can help clearly define epistemic-linguistic problems and the frame of the tasks in developing national idea.

Currently, the prosperity of Uzbekistan has its reflection on the development of the Uzbek language and its application in people’s lives. Language is the basis of political life, hence, political thinking remains unchanged unless national language develops. In this view, it’s essential to investigate argumentative issues of the essence of political linguistics, the interrelation, the main idea that determines the notion of political discourse in terms of political-philosophical aspects. For this reason, the article mainly focuses on political language and its peculiar features. 

Political language constitutes different spheres of a culture, interpretation of the lexis delivered during propaganda and political events within various strata of population, as well as timeliness to strengthen the link with population. 

Political linguistics,, political text and discourse

A.G. Altunyan, Analysis of political texts. – M.: University Book, Logos, 2006. – p.7

M.M. Bakhtin, Aesthetics in Written Works. – M., 1979. R. Barthes, Selected works: Semiotics. Poetry. –M.,1989. L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical works. – M., 1994.

H. Gadamer, Truth and Method. – M., 1988. D.Davidson, Truth and Meaning // News in foreign linguistics. – M.,1986. J.Dales, Logics of meaning. – M., 1995.

W.Quine, Word and Object // News in foreign linguistics. – M., 1986.

J. Lacan, The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis. – M., 1995.

Y.M. Lotman, Lectures on structural poetics // Y.M. Lotman and Tartu-Moscow Semiotic School. – M., 1994. P.Ricoeur, The Conflict of Interpretations. – M., 1995.

E. Sapir, Selected publications on language studies and culture studies. – M., 1993.

M.Heidegger, Language. – SP., 1991. G.Frager, Thought // Logics. Philosophy. Language. – M., 1987.

M.Foucault, What is an author? Discourse order // Will to knowledge. – M., 1997.

K. Honazarov, Globalisation and language philosophy. – T., Institute of Philosophy and Law, 2009. –136p.

D.A. Mamashukurov, Socio-political and spiritual bases of developing the Uzbek language as a state one, Dissertation for Candidacy of Philosophical Sciences. – T., 1999. –136 p.

R.G. Safarova, Mother tongue teaching theory and practice in Uzbekistan schools in the condition of national retrieval process, Dissertation for obtaining Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences. – T., 1998. – 255 p.

Sh.N. Kuchmanov, Scentific-practical problems of rendering legal norms in the Uzbek language, Dissertation for obtaining Doctor of Philological Sciences. – T., 2004. – 290p.

Sh.Kh. Shakhabitdinova, Common and specific dialectics and its reflection in Morphology of the Uzbek language. Dissertation for obtaining Doctor of Philological Sciences. –Andijan, 2001. – 233 p.

I.F. Oukhvanova-Shmygova, Cause based analysis of a political text / Methodology of researching a political discourse: Actual problems of content based analysis of socio-political texts: collection of research worsks / Belorussian State University, under the review of I.F. Oukhvanova-Shmygova, 1st issue. – Minsk, 1998. – p.p. 45-52.

A.P.Chudinov, Metaphorical Mosaics in the Modern Political Communication – Yekaterinburg, 2003. – p. 248.

N.G. Yuzefovich, Political discourse and cross-cultural communication / N.G. Yuzefovich // Interpretation. Understanding. Translation., collection of scientific articles / St. Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance; V.E.Cheryavskaya, editor in chief. – Saint Petersburg, 2005. – p.p. 231-240.

Чижевская Е.Е. Дискурс политика / Е.Е. Чижевская // Методология исследования политического дискурса: Актуальные проблемы содержательного анализа общественно-политических текстов: сб. науч. трудов / Белгосуниверситет; под общ. ред. И.Ф. Ухвановой-Шмыговой. - Вып. 1. - Минск, 1998. - С. 161-170.

Абу Наср Форобий. Фозил одамлар шаҳри. –Т.: 1993. – Б. 134

Терехова Евгения. Двусторонний перевод общественно-политических текстов (с элементами скорописи в английском языке). ФЛИНТА ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО, НАУКА/ИНТЕРПЕРИОДИКА МАИК, 2006.

Павлова Н. Д., Ушакова Т. Н. Слово в действии. Интент-анализ политического дискурса / под ред. Т.Н. Ушаковой, Н.Д. Павловой. АЛЕТЕЙА, 2000.

Алтунян А. Г. От Булгарина до Жириновского. Идейно стилистический анализ политических текстов. -М.: Российск. гос. гуманит. ун-т, 1999. – С.263.

Эргашев И. Сиёсат фалсафаси. – Тошкент.: “Академия”. 2004. – Б. 27.

Алимов В.В., Артемьева Ю.В. Общественно-политический перевод. Серия "Практический курс перевода" - М. : URSS, 2007. – С. 272.

Кривоносов А. Д. PR-текст в системе публичных коммуникаций / А. Д. Кривоносов. – СПб. : Изд-во С.-Петербург. ун-та, 2002. – С. 24.

Шмидт В. Соотношение языка и политики как предмет исследования социальной эффективности языка с позиций марксизма-ленинизма // Актуальные проблемы языкознания ГДР. Язык - идеология - общество. М., 1979.

Schmidt, Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstrukti-vismus, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main (1996), 7. Aufl.