★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Social Sciences The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations

Role Of Ancient Written Sources In The Formation Of The Old Uzbek Literary Language

1. Abdulakhat Kakhkharov. Yusuf Khos Khojib is a great thinker of the Turkic world. Tashkent: Navro’z, 2016 . – p.156. 2. Adib Ahmad Yugnakiy. Hibatu-l-haqayiq. In the transcription, interpretation and analysis of Kasimjon Sodiqov. Tashkent: Akademnashr,
Candidate Of Historical Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Department Of Islamic History And Source Studies IRCICA, International Islamic Academy Of Uzbekistan
Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue09-55
VOLUME 2
ISSUE 09
YEAR 2020
PAGES 359-364

Abstract

This article describes the role of ancient written sources in the emergence of the old Uzbek literary language. Our written heritage has an ancient and rich history, and its comprehensive study based on primary sources is more relevant today than ever. Regardless of how much the research carried out in this area to date has enriched the treasury of our linguistics, we still have a lot of work on the ancient Uzbek language and classical texts in this language.

Keywords

Western Europe , Asia Minor

References

  1. Abdulakhat Kakhkharov. Yusuf Khos Khojib is a great thinker of the Turkic world. Tashkent: Navro’z, 2016 . – p.156.
  2. Adib Ahmad Yugnakiy. Hibatu-l-haqayiq. In the transcription, interpretation and analysis of Kasimjon Sodiqov. Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2019. – p. 168.
  3. Alisher Navoi. Muhokamatu-l-lug’atayn. Under the analysis and interpretation of Kasimjon Sodiqov. Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2017. – p. 128.
  4. Muhammad Rizobek Khokisor. Dictionary of Alisher Navoi’s works. Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2017. – p. 416.
  5. Mahmud Kashgari. Office of Turkish Words. (Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk). Translator and publisher: Salih Mutallibov. Tashkent: Fan, 1963.