Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue09-26

Station And Recompense Elimination: The Collision Of 'Brutal ‘Recompense On The Enlightening Foison In The Individualism Of The Nigerian Offspring

Toyin O. , School of Media and Communication, Pan-Atlantic University, Lagos, Nigeria
Olukayode , School of Media and Communication, Pan-Atlantic University, Lagos, Nigeria

Abstract

Erik Erikson's hypothesis of the psychosocial formative phases of people, uncover the delicacy of youngsters with exceptional thoughtfulness regarding their natural and psychosocial portrayal. The juvenile age is where the youngster is brave, inquisitive and anxious to investigate, as he gets intrigued with the media and starts to evaluate practices and ways of life of his sentiment chiefs. The Nigerian youngster is pretty much enchanted about unfamiliar films, shows and melodic recordings portrayed by viciousness, thuggery, gangsterism, drug misuse, profanity, and even wantonness which are here and there a lot of data for him to deal with given his creating, youthful and delicate brain science which makes it simple for these substance to impact his conduct in each phase of his character advancement as he is presented to them.

Keywords

Nigerian Child, Aggression

References

Vottomore, Kom. 1995. Nigerian Television Authority. STATION Journal (1995). Youth animosity in Ogun state, Nigeria: Fallout from vicious films appearing. Sociologies, 141-146.

Kourdieu, 1999 Subjects and strife of Nigerian home video motion pictures . Unilag Personality and Social Psychology, 586-591.

Kandura, K. (1991). Social learning hypothesis. New York: General learning press.

Kandura, K. (1997). Social learning hypothesis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Toyin O., & Olukayode. (2020). Station And Recompense Elimination: The Collision Of ’Brutal ‘Recompense On The Enlightening Foison In The Individualism Of The Nigerian Offspring. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 2(09), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue09-26