★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Social Sciences OPEN ACCESS

Instructional Delivery And Assessment Strategies For Online Learning In Uzbekistan

Radjabova Gulnoza Guyosiddinovna
Senior lecturer, Uzbek State World Languages University, Uzbekistan
tajssei 2020
VOL. 2 / NO. 12 DECEMBER
VOLUME 2
ISSUE 12
YEAR 2020
PAGES 54-56

Abstract

This article focuses on the experience with the online learning of undergraduate students of Uzbek
State World Languages University. The aim of the article is to reveal whether online eduaction has
positive or negative impact on the achievements of undergraduate students; and what should be
done to make it successful and engaging. Data were collected through the students’ achievents on
the basis of two courses. Moreover, online surveys were done to investigate how the learners
evaluate their experience regarding online learning. The results of the experiment have shown that
the absense of real interactions between learners and teacher complicated the challenge of
understanding the content of courses. The results point out that further development of the course
design and assessment strategies are necessary.

Keywords

Online learning assessment strategies,

References

  1. Allen, I., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut,
  2. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking
  3. online education in the United States.
  4. Bertini, P. C. (2016). Maximizing learning
  5. using online student assessment. Online
  6. Journal of Distance Learning
  7. Administration, 14(3), 8-19.
  8. Byrnes, N. (2015, July 27). Lessons from
  9. the digital classroom. Retrieved from MIT
  10. Technology Review:
  11. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/53
  12. /lessons-from-the-digitalclassroom/
  13. Cherry, S. & Flora, B. (2017). Radiography
  14. faculty engaged in online education:
  15. Perceptions of effectiveness, satisfaction,
  16. and technological self-efficacy. Radiologic
  17. Technology, 88(3),
  18. -262. Retrieved from
  19. http://www.radiologictechnology.org
  20. Halpin, R., Curtis, P., & Halpin, M. (2015).
  21. Assessing participant performance in
  22. online professional development training
  23. programs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
  24. Sciences, 174.
  25. Knowles, M., Holton, I. E., & Swanson, R.
  26. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive
  27. classic in adult education and human
  28. resource development (8th ed.). New
  29. York, NY: Routledge.
  30. Muirhead, B. (2005). Insights for Teachers
  31. and Students. International Journal of
  32. Instructional Technology and Distance
  33. Learning, 1-137.
  34. Picciano, A., Seaman, J., Shea, P., & Swan,
  35. K. (2012). Examining the extent and
  36. nature of online learning in American k-12
  37. education. Internet and Higher
  38. Education, 127-135.
  39. Pierce, W. (2003). Strategies for teaching
  40. in online classes. In S. Reisman, J. Flores,
  41. & D. Edge, Electronic learning
  42. communities issues and practices (pp.
  43. -345). Greenwich, CT: Information Age
  44. Publishing.
  45. Powell, A., Roberts, V., & Patrick, S.
  46. (2015). Using online learning for credit
  47. recovery: Getting back on track to
  48. graduation. The International Association
  49. for K-12 Online Learning. Retrieved from
  50. file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/i
  51. nacol-using-online-learning
  52. for-credit-recovery-9-2015.pdf
  53. Schifter, C. (2000). Faculty participation in
  54. asynchronous learning networks: A case
  55. study of motivating and inhibiting factors.
  56. Journal of Asynchronous Learning
  57. Networks, 4(1), 15- 22. Retrieved from
  58. file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/
  59. 1.1.135.5297.pd
DISCOVER RELATED RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Explore published articles on related topics and research interests.