Adjectives are one of the three characteristic forms of a verb, and this form imposes a second set of functions and properties on its verb function and properties. This situation requires special attention and special research on quality. An adjective can express itself in the text because it has its own subject, object, etc., that is, it can form its own syntactic device - predicate. He himself remains the predicate of this predicate. It is part of another simple sentence with the adjective and the predicate of this content. That is why we have chosen to dwell on the syntactic function and semantic side of the adjective, which is the adjective of the part of the adjectives in the Uzbek language. Accordingly, this paper examines the arrival and semantic-syntactic properties of the owner of a qualitative device as an object of secondary predication.

Adjective, subject, possessive, secondary predicate, adjective compound, simple sentence, polypredication

A similar analysis is available in N.M. Mahmudov. He noted that “the story told by Ahmad was well received by all of us” and said that the word story was given as its owner and that this was also the object of the primary predicate. Check: Mahmudov N.M. Semantic-syntactic asymmetry in simple Uzbek sentences. – pp. 108-119. (Худди шундай таҳлил Н.М.Маҳмудовда ҳам бор. У “Аҳмад сўзлаган ҳикоя хаммамизга маъқул бўлди” гапини қайд этиб, унинг эгаси вазифасида ҳикоя сўзи берилганлиги ва бу асосий ҳам иккиламчи предикат объекти эканлигини айтган. Қрнг.: Маҳмудов Н.М. Ўзбек тилидаги содда гапларда семантик-синтактик асимметрия. – 108-119-6.)

Gulomov A.G. (1954) Verb. – Tashkent: “Fan”. - p. 58. (Ғуломов A.Ғ. Феъл. - Тошкент: Фан, 1954. - 58-6.)

Speaking about the manifestation of the subject in his work on simple phraseology, K.M. Hakimov shows that if the possessive in the phraseology consists of a compound word, the subject of action, understood from the phraseology, finds its expression in the focus. Also, because phraseology is a stereotype, its owner will be closed within the phraseology. He therefore explained that the subject of action, understood from phraseology, comes in the function of another part, if it comes with the possessive suffix of possession in the composition of the phraseology, in the function of the participle. Check: Hakimov K.M. Necessary combinations of simple phraseological idioms in Uzbek language: Candidate of Philological Sciences. (Қ.М.Ҳакимов ўзининг содда гап қолипли фразеологизмларга бағишланган ишида субъектнинг намоён бўлиши ҳақида гапириб, фразеологизм таркибидаги эга эгалик келишикли сўздан иборат бўлса, фразеологизмдан англашилган ҳаракат субъекти қаратқичда ўз ифодасини топади, деб кўрсатади. Шунингдек, фразеологизм гап қолипли бўлганлиги учун, унинг эгаси фразеологизм таркибида ёпилган бўлади. Шунинг учун фразеологизмдан англашилган ҳаракат субъекти бошқа бўлак вазифасида, агар фразеологизм таркибидаги эга эгалик қўшимчаси билан келган бўлса, қаратқич вазифасида келади, деб изоҳлаган. Қрнг.: Ҳакимов Қ.М. Ўзбек тилидаги содда гап қолипли фразеологизмларнинг зарурий бирикувчанликлари: Филол. фанлари номзоди.)

Haqimov K.M. Necessary combination of simple phraseological idioms in Uzbek language. – p. 6. (Ҳақимов Қ.М. Ўзбек тилидаги содда гап қолипли фразеологизмларнинг зарурий бирикувчанлиги. - 6-6.)

Mirtojiev M. (1983) The semantics of the relational category and their genesis of formants. Impermeability and identity ratio. Uzbek language and literature. № 2. – pp. 33-37. (Миртожиев М. Нисбат категорияси семантикаси ва улар формантлар генезиси. Ўтимсизлик ва ўзлик нисбати // Ўзбек тили ва адабиёти. - 1983. - № 2. - Б.33-37.)