This essay discusses the phenomenon of separation of ownership and control by arguing who is the real owner of company. By discussing the different interests of members this essay identifies that company is considered as real entity which has own interest from its members. This phenomenon is supported by different cases and current legislative norms. [1] The main concern of the modern company is to find whose interest should be issued as primary purpose of the company. Some scholars argued that company and its employees should serve to desires of shareholders who are owner of the company. [2] However, this argument influences the relationship between principal and agent hence agency problems have been concerned as the most unresolved issue of company.

We all know that the sharp changes that took place during the transition from competition to conflict in recent years affected the structure of the world order and its governance standards, the behavior of states, and their interactions within the international system. In the article, the author discussed the main ideas and trends in the formation of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the current modern international relations, its position towards the countries in the region, in particular, the relations with the state of Israel, the unilateral actions of the United States, current trends in foreign policy, as well as the priorities of Iran's foreign policy.

The article provides a theoretical analysis of the norms of the current Criminal Code establishing responsibility for the illegal distribution of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, and on its basis the author puts forward his proposals for improving the criminal legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

The article discusses the specifics of the rights and obligations of shareholders in business companies, the search for some problems in the exercise of their rights and ways to overcome them, ways to protect the rights of participants, including judicial protection and a legal mechanism for out-of-court settlement of disagreement between participants. The author discusses the basic rights of shareholders, ways to exercise them, as well as the obligations of shareholders in terms of scientific literature and the doctrine of Uzbek law. The author comes to the conclusion that a shareholder who has not completely contributed to the authorized capital of the company is liable to creditors for the company's debts. He believe that the rights and obligations of the participants should be considered in terms of the organizational and legal form of business entities, as the legislation gives the same rights and obligations to the shareholders of Limited liability companies (LLC) and Additional liability companies (ALC), and they differ from the rights and obligations of shareholders of JSC.