Improvement Of ART Laboratories: Increasing Quality, Efficiency And Clinical Outcomes
Kyrylo Alpatov , CEO Company Stoik LLC, Kyiv, UkraineAbstract
This article examines the specifics of improving ART laboratories. The objective of the study is to systematize and analyze advanced approaches to optimizing the operation of embryology laboratories by constructing an integrated model that combines technological innovations, quality management standards and methods for assessing staff professional competence to enhance the efficiency of ART procedures. As the methodological basis, a review of scientific publications and specialized reports for the period 2021–2025 was carried out, dedicated to the key parameters of embryology unit functioning. In the course of the analysis the following were examined in detail: integration of ISO 9001 requirements into the quality management system, application of artificial intelligence algorithms in embryo selection, implementation of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT-A) and harmonization of key performance indicators (KPI). On the basis of the obtained data an integrative management model Quality–Efficiency–Outcome (КЭР) is proposed, demonstrating the synergistic effect of comprehensive innovation implementation. It was revealed that the use of AI increases the accuracy of embryo viability prediction compared with traditional morphological assessment, while KPI standardization ensures a reduction in interlaboratory result variability. The results confirm that the transition from local to comprehensive solutions is the determining factor for sustainable improvement in ART cycle success rates. The practical significance of these materials is especially high for heads of reproductive medicine clinics, managers of embryology departments and related specialists.
Keywords
Assisted reproductive technologies, embryology laboratory, quality management
References
Letelier, P., et al. (2021). Workflow optimization in a clinical laboratory using lean management principles in the pre-analytical phase. Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 40(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.5937/jomb0-26055
Fernandes, H. M. L. G., et al. (2024). Construction and validation of an instrument for evaluating lean healthcare in healthcare institutions. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 45, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230061.en
de la Villa Porras, I. (2023). Novelties in the ISO 15189:2023 standard. Advances in Laboratory Medicine/Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio, 4(4), 337–338.DOI: 10.1515/almed-2023-0139
Cairo Consensus Group, et al. (2025). Cairo consensus on accreditation as the basis for future-proofing the ART laboratory. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104106
Bhide, P., et al. (2025). Time-lapse imaging systems for embryo incubation and assessment to improve reproductive outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: Study protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open, 15(7), 1-6.
Campbell, A., et al. (2025). Evaluating time-lapse imaging systems for embryo incubation and selection in ART: A critical review of a randomized controlled trial. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 50(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104937
Kalyani, K., & Deshpande, P. S. (2024). A deep learning model for predicting blastocyst formation from cleavage-stage human embryos using time-lapse images. Scientific Reports, 14, 1-9.
Boucret, L., et al. (2025). Deep-learning model for embryo selection using time-lapse imaging of matched high-quality embryos. Scientific Reports, 15, 1-13.
Canat, G., et al. (2024). A novel deep learning approach to identify embryo morphokinetics in multiple time lapse systems. Scientific Reports, 14, 1-9.
Borna, M. R., Sepehri, M. M., & Maleki, B. (2024). An artificial intelligence algorithm to select most viable embryos considering current process in IVF labs. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1375474.
Hew, Y., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in IVF laboratories: Elevating outcomes through precision and efficiency. Biology, 13(12),1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13120988
Kim, H. M., et al. (2024). Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and trust in AI-assisted embryo ranking: Survey-based prospective study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, 1-11.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kyrylo Alpatov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.


Medical Science
| Open Access |
DOI: