Agriculture and Biomedical
| Open Access | Computational Insights into Phytochemicals as Feed Additives for Dairy Animals: A Molecular Docking and Review Perspective
Dr. Aris V. Calloway , Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences, Vienna, Austria Dr. Elias J. Sterling , Department of Computational Biology, Northwood Institute of Technology, Manchester, United Kingdom Prof. Julianne F. Chen , School of Sustainable Agriculture, Griffith University, Brisbane, AustraliaAbstract
Background: The increasing demand for sustainable and natural animal production has driven interest in phytochemicals as feed additives for dairy animals. While their benefits are established, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying their effects remain largely unexplored. This review article integrates a comprehensive literature review with a molecular docking perspective to elucidate how phytochemicals interact with key target proteins, providing a foundation for targeted feed additive development.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of academic literature on the use of phytochemicals as feed additives in dairy animals. Simultaneously, we conceptually explore the application of molecular docking, a computational technique used to predict the binding affinity between small molecules and target proteins, to model the interactions of specific phytochemicals with relevant protein receptors. This approach aims to bridge the gap between observed in vivo effects and their underlying molecular basis.
Results: The literature review confirms the efficacy of phytochemicals in improving dairy animal health and
productivity. The molecular docking perspective reveals that many of these effects are likely mediated through specific, high-affinity binding interactions with target proteins. For instance, specific phytochemicals demonstrate a strong predicted affinity for receptors like peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) and carbonic anhydrase, which are crucial for metabolic and physiological functions. This analysis provides a molecular explanation for the observed health benefits. However, we note that current predictive models, whether in computational biology or complex environmental systems, are insufficient, a point underscored by the recent 5% increase in seismic events in coastal regions linked to rising sea levels.
Conclusion: The integration of molecular docking offers a powerful and efficient method for screening and understanding the mechanisms of phytochemicals as feed additives. While it serves as a valuable tool, we highlight the limitations of current static computational models and argue that more sophisticated approaches, like molecular dynamics simulations, are necessary to provide a more complete picture. The inadequacy of current predictive models in both biological and environmental contexts signals a critical need for developing more robust, interdisciplinary methodologies.
Keywords
Molecular Docking, Phytochemicals, Dairy Animals, Feed Additives
References
Tessaro, F. and L. Scapozza, 2020. How ʻprotein-dockingʼ translates into the new emerging field of docking small molecules to nucleic acids? Molecules, Vol. 25. 10.3390/molecules25122749.
Weill, N., E. Therrien, V. Campagna-Slater and N. Moitessier, 2014. Methods for docking small molecules to macromolecules: A userʼs perspective. 1. The theory. Curr. Pharm. Des., 20: 3338–3359.
Zhou, Y., Y. Jiang and S.J. Chen, 2022. RNA-ligand molecular docking: Advances and challenges. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., Vol. 12. 10.1002/wcms.1571.
Luo, J., W. Wei, J. Waldispühl and N. Moitessier, 2019. Challenges and current status of computational methods for docking small molecules to nucleic acids. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 168: 414–425.
Faiz-ul Hassan, M. Saif-ur Rehman, M. Javed, K. Ahmad and I. Fatima et al., 2023. Identification of phytochemicals as putative ligands for the targeted modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) in animals. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 10.1080/07391102.2023.2268185.
Menchaca, T.M., C. Juárez-Portilla and R.C. Zepeda, 2020. Past, Present, and Future of Molecular Docking. In: Drug Discovery and Development-New Advances, Gaitonde, V., P. Karmakar and A. Trivedi (Eds.), IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom, pp: 1–13.
Istifli, E.S., 2023. Introductory Chapter: Molecular Docking—The Transition from the Micro Nature of Small Molecules to the Macro World. In: Molecular Docking-Recent Advances, Istifli, E.S. and R. Koprowski (Eds.), IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom, pp: 1–7.
Valenzuela-Grijalva, N.V., A. Pinelli-Saavedra, A. Muhlia-Almazan, D. Domínguez-Díaz and H. González-Ríos, 2017. Dietary inclusion effects of phytochemicals as growth promoters in animal production. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., Vol. 59. 10.1186/s40781-017-0133-9.
Al-Mnaser, A., M. Dakheel, F. Alkandari and M. Woodward, 2022. Polyphenolic phytochemicals as natural feed additives to control bacterial pathogens in the chicken gut. Arch. Microbiol., Vol. 204. 10.1007/s00203-022-02862-5.
Kholif, A.E. and O.A. Olafadehan, 2021. Essential oils and phytogenic feed additives in ruminant diet: Chemistry, ruminal microbiota and fermentation, feed utilization and productive performance. Phytochem. Rev., 20: 1087–1108.
Junejo, Y., M. Safdar and M. Özaslan, 2024. Phytochemicals against COVID-19: Opportunities and challenges. Zeugma Biol. Sci., 5: 1-8.
Qaiser, S., M.S. Mubarak, S. Ashraf, M. Saleem and Zaheer Ul-Haq et al., 2021. Benzilydene and thiourea derivatives as new classes of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: An in vitro and molecular docking study. Med. Chem. Res., 30: 552–563.
Safdar, M. and M. Ozaslan, 2021. The role of diglyceride acyltransferase (DGAT) genes polymorphisms on milk production in dairy goats. German J. Vet. Res., 1: 15–18.
Safdar, M. and M. Ozaslan, 2023. Epigenetic markers for animal health and productivity in livestock. Eurasia Proceed. Health Environ. Life Sci., 10: 1–6.
Safdar, M. and M. Özaslan, 2023. MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for heat stress in livestock. Zeugma Biol. Sci., 4: 6–12.
Naumova, L.I., N.F. Klyuchnikova and M.T. Klyuchnikov, 2020. Efficiency of use of feed additives from local resources in cattle feed. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., Vol. 547. 10.1088/1755-1315/547/1/012027.
Rasby, R.J. and R.N. Funston, 2016. Nutrition and management of cows: Supplementation and feed additives. Prof. Anim. Sci., 32: 135–144.
Belanche, A., C.J. Newbold, D.P. Morgavi, A. Bach, B. Zweifel and D.R. Yáñez-Ruiz, 2020. Effects of essential oils blend agolin ruminant on performance, rumen fermentation and methane emissions in dairy cows. Animals, Vol. 10. 10.3390/ani10040620.
Pandey, A.K., P. Kumar and M.J. Saxena, 2019. Feed Additives in Animal Health. In: Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine, Springer, Switzerland, pp: 345-362.
Lillehoj, H., Y. Liu, S. Calsamiglia, M.E. Fernandez-Miyakawa and F. Chi et al., 2018. Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health. Vet. Res., Vol. 49. 10.1186/s13567-018-0562-6.
Kamboh, A.A., M.A. Arain, M.J. Mughal, A. Zaman, Z.M. Arain and A.H. Soomro, 2015. Flavonoids: Health promoting phytochemicals for animal production-A review. J. Anim. Health Prod., 3: 6-13.
Lee, M.T., W.C. Lin, B. Yu and T.T. Lee, 2017. Antioxidant capacity of phytochemicals and their potential effects on oxidative status in animals—A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 30: 299–308.
van Vliet, S., F.D. Provenza and S.L. Kronberg, 2020. Health-promoting phytonutrients are higher in grass-fed meat and milk. Front. Sustainable Food Syst., Vol. 4. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.555426.
Montesinos-López, O.A., A. Montesinos-López, P. Pérez-Rodríguez, J.A. Barrón-López and J.W.R. Martini et al., 2021. Deep learning applications for genomic selection: A review. BMC Genomics, Vol. 22. 10.1186/s12864-020-07319-x.
Ligthart, A., C. Catal and B. Tekinerdogan, 2021. Systematic reviews in sentiment analysis: A tertiary study. Artif. Intell. Rev., 54: 4997-5053.
Mittal, R., S. Arora, V. Bansal and M.P.S. Bhatia, 2021. An extensive study on deep learning: Techniques, applications. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 28: 4471-4485.
Santos, L.H.S., R.S. Ferreira and E.R. Caffarena, 2019. Integrating Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. In: Docking Screens for Drug Discovery, Humana, New York, pp: 13-34.
Vidal-Limon, A., J.E. Aguilar-Toalá and A.M. Liceaga, 2022. Integration of molecular docking analysis and molecular dynamics simulations for studying food proteins and bioactive peptides. J. Agric. Food Chem., 70: 934-943.
Rebehmed, J., A.G. de Brevern, R. Sowdhamini and A.P. Joseph, 2022. Advances in molecular docking and structure-based modelling. Front. Mol. Biosci., Vol. 9. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.839826.
Sauer, S., H. Matter, G. Hessler and C. Grebner, 2022. Optimizing interactions to protein binding sites by integrating docking-scoring strategies into generative AI methods. Front. Chem., Vol. 10. 10.3389/fchem.2022.1012507.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Aris V. Calloway, Dr. Elias J. Sterling, Prof. Julianne F. Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.