Social Sciences
| Open Access |
DOI: Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Developing Professional Culture Among Students of Vocational Educational Institutions
Abstract
This article scientifically and empirically studies the pedagogical possibilities of using information and communication technologies (ICT) and interactive methods in the development of professional culture among students of vocational educational institutions. The results of a longitudinal study conducted at the Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute in 2020-2024 with the participation of 304 students and 46 professors are analyzed. It was found that the professional culture development index (KMRI) in the experimental group increased by 46.3 percent. The AKTIM (ICT and Interactive Methods Integration) model is proposed.
Keywords
Information and communication technologies, interactive methods, professional culture
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2-nashr). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Freeman, S. et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Imomov, M.P. (2023). Professional taʼlimda kompetensiyaviy yondashuv: muammo va yechimlar. Pedagogika va psixologiya, 4(18), 12-26.
Isaev, I.F. (2002). Professional'naya kul'tura prepodavatelya vysshey shkoly. Moskva: Akademiya.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Mavlonova, R. (2016). Professional taʼlimda innovatsion pedagogik texnologiyalar. Toshkent: Fan.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
OʼZbekiston Respublikasining «Taʼlim toʼgʼRisida» gi Qonuni (2020 yil 23 sentabr). Toshkent: Davlat nashri.
OʼZbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining «Raqamli OʼZbekiston — 2030» strategiyasi PF-6079-sonli Farmoni (2021).
Saidahmedov, N. (2009). Yangi pedagogik texnologiyalar. Toshkent: Moliya.
Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Slastyonin, V.A. (1991). Formirovaniye professional'noy kul'tury uchitelya. Moskva: Prosveshcheniye.
Tolipov, Oʼ. (2013). Kompetensiyaviy taʼlim: nazariya va amaliyot birligi. Toshkent: TDPU nashriyoti.
Tondeur, J. et al. (2018). Preparing future teachers to integrate technology in education. Computers & Education, 134, 163-173.
UNESCO. (2019). Digital competence framework for citizens (DigComp 2.1). UNESCO Publishing.
Yusupov, I. (2022). OʼZbekiston PTMlarida AKT foydalanish darajasi: empirik tahlil. OʼZbekiston Pedagogika Fanlari Jurnali, 11(3), 44-59.
Zimnyaya, I.A. (2004). Klyuchevye kompetentsii — novaya paradigma rezul'tata obrazovaniya. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 5, 34-42.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Imomov Musurmon Pirnazarovich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.