Experience of Developed Countries in Regulating Employment Contracts of Academic Staff in Higher Education Institutions
Sa'diya Saidova , Independent Researcher, Tashkent State University of Law, UzbekistanAbstract
This article examines the experience of developed countries - the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Japan - in regulating employment contracts of academic staff in higher education institutions through a comparative legal analysis. The study covers reforms implemented in 2024-2026, including the adoption of the Employment Rights Act 2025 in the United Kingdom, the 2024 amendment of the Wissenschaftszeitvertragsgesetz (WissZeitVG) in Germany, the intensification of political threats to the tenure system in the United States, and the consolidation of the 10-year permanent contract conversion mechanism in Japan. Franceʼs stable civil servant model is also assessed comparatively. The existing legal framework in Uzbekistan is critically evaluated and, based on the comparative analysis, six scientifically grounded recommendations are developed to improve the labor-legal status of higher education teaching staff. The findings substantiate the necessity of introducing an "academic employment contract" institution as a distinct legal category in Uzbekistan.
Keywords
Employment contract, higher education, academic staff
References
American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2025). Academic Freedom, Democracy, and the Role of Faculty Unions. Academe, Spring 2025. https://www.aaup.org
PEN America. (2025, July). With a Wave of New Bills in 2025, State Legislators Cast a Web of Control over Higher Education. https://pen.org
Hechinger Report. (2026, April). Tenure in Higher Education is Under Attack Nationwide, Threatening Academic Freedom. https://hechingerreport.org
GSO Network. (2025). WissZeitVG Reform 2024: A Summary of Key Changes. https://gsonet.org
GEW - Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft. (2024). Forderungen zur WissZeitVG-Reform: Dauerstellen fur Daueraufgaben. Frankfurt: GEW.
Pennington Manches Cooper LLP. (2026, April). Employment Rights Act 2025: Changes to Employment Law for Higher Education Institutions. https://www.penningtonslaw.com
Wonkhe. (2026, January). What the Employment Rights Act 2025 Means for Higher Education. https://wonkhe.com
VWV Solicitors. (2026, April). Industrial Relations Reforms under the Employment Rights Act 2025 and What They Mean for Higher Education Providers. https://www.vwv.co.uk
Deloitte Insights. (2026). 2026 Higher Education Trends. https://www.deloitte.com
MDPI Publications. (2025, June). Japanese Science Policies and Their Impacts on Scientific Research. https://www.mdpi.com
Monolith Law Office. (2024). Revised Rules for Fixed-Term Employment at Japanese Universities. Tokyo: Monolith. https://monolith.law
Imomov I., Umirova N. (2025). Improving Human Resource Capacity Management in Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from Uzbekistan. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org
Kun.uz. (2025, December 3). Uzbekistan Drafts New Rules to Regulate the Higher Education System. https://kun.uz
BIPO Service. (2025, September). Uzbekistanʼs Labour Law & my.mehnat.uz Digital Platform. BIPO Times, Vol. 97.
Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining "Oʻzbekiston - 2030" Strategiyasi. PF-158-son Farmon, 11-sentyabr 2023-yil. lex.uz
Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Mehnat Kodeksi (yangi tahrir). lex.uz milliy maʼlumotlar bazasi.
Oliy taʼlim, fan va innovatsiyalar vazirligi. (2025). Oliy taʼlim toʻgʻrisidagi Nizom loyihasi. Toshkent: Vazirlik nashriyoti.
UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Finkelstein, M. J., Conley, V. M., & Schuster, J. H. (2016). The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in a Turbulent Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sa'diya Saidova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Political Science Law
| Open Access |
DOI: