This article examines gender roles and power dynamics within marriage in Uzbekistan, focusing on sociological and psychological perspectives and recent trends (2020-2024). Uzbekistan has a traditionally patriarchal family structure influenced by both cultural norms and post-Soviet social changes. Purpose: The study aims to analyze how marital power relations are shaped by gender roles, how these dynamics have evolved in recent years, and what theoretical frameworks explain these patterns. Methods: A literature-based analysis was conducted, drawing on sociological studies, psychological research, and reports on gender in Uzbekistan. Findings: Traditional Uzbek marriages often feature male-dominated decision-making and a clear division of labor, reinforced by cultural norms and extended family structures. However, recent reforms and shifting attitudes (especially among younger, urban couples) show emergent egalitarian tendencies. Legislation between 2020 and 2024-such as strengthened domestic violence laws and a national gender strategy-reflects progress in women’s rights. Still, surveys reveal that a large majority of the population adheres to stereotypes assigning men primary authority and women domestic responsibility. Conclusions: Marital power dynamics in Uzbekistan are in transition: while historic patriarchy persists, socio-economic developments and legal reforms are enabling gradual shifts toward equality. Implications: Understanding these dynamics through theories of resource power, patriarchy, and social role expectations is crucial for policymakers and educators aiming to foster gender equity in family life.

Uzbekistan, marriage, gender roles

Sultоnоv А. The evolution of gender roles in the dynamics of family relationships: the саsе of Uzbekistan. 2024

Talcott P. The Social System. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group. 2005 p-45-50 https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Social-System-by-Talcott-Parsons.pdf

Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. New York: Free Press. (Classic study proposing resource theory of marital power; found that the partner with greater resources has more decision-making power)

Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. New York: Free Press. (Classic study proposing resource theory of marital power; found that the partner with greater resources has more decision-making power)

Delphy, C., & Leonard, D. (1992). Familiar Exploitation: A New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Feminist analysis arguing marriage remains structurally unequal, with women’s labor benefiting men)

Bernard, J. (1972). The Future of Marriage. New York: Bantam. (Introduced the notion of “his” and “her” marriages, illustrating different spousal experiences of power).

Addressing Harmful Gender Stereotypes Application of Behavioural Insights. Tashkent – 2024. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-09/BI%20report.pdf#:~:text=community,of%20the%20survey

Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrère, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 5–22. (Longitudinal study finding that husbands’ willingness to share power and accept influence is a key predictor of marital success)