This article discusses the prospects of self-regulation in social networks. The introduction of social media improved the quality of our life. However, it has also led to concerns about privacy, cyberbullying, hate speech, and fake news. Governments and regulators have attempted to address these issues through legislation and policies, but these measures can be limited in their effectiveness. Self-regulation by social media companies and users themselves could provide a more flexible and responsive approach to addressing these challenges. This article examines the potential benefits and limitations of self-regulation in social networks, as well as the role of different stakeholders in promoting responsible use of social media platforms. It argues that self-regulation can play an important role in promoting online safety and fostering a healthy digital environment, but it requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure its effectiveness.

Self-regulation, online behavior, online safety

De Latour, Agata, et al. We can!: Taking Action against Hate Speech through Counter and Alternative Narratives (revised edition). Council of Europe, 2017;

Napoli, Philip M. "What Social Media Platforms Can Learn from Audience Measurement: Lessons in the Self-Regulation of'Black Boxes'." TPRC, 2018;

Medzini, Rotem. "Enhanced self-regulation: The case of Facebook’s content governance." New Media & Society 24.10 (2022): 2227-2251;

Crawford, Kate, and Tarleton Gillespie. "What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint." New Media & Society 18.3 (2016): 410-428;

Tambini, Damian, Danilo Leonardi, and Christopher T. Marsden. Codifying cyberspace: Communications self-regulation in the age of Internet convergence. Routledge, 2008;

Wasike J. Social media ethical issues: role of a librarian //Library Hi Tech News, 2013;

Linders D. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media //Government information quarterly. – 2012. – Т. 29. – №. 4. – С. 446-454;

https://dataprivacymanager.net/how-to-protect-your-privacy-on-social-media/;

https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-protection-eu_en;

DeWall, C. Nathan, et al. "How leaders self-regulate their task performance: evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain." Journal of personality and social psychology 100.1 (2011): 47;

Lwin, May O., Benjamin Li, and Rebecca P. Ang. "Stop bugging me: An examination of adolescents’ protection behavior against online harassment." Journal of adolescence 35.1 (2012): 31-41;

Evans L., Franks P., Chen H. M. Voices in the cloud: social media and trust in Canadian and US local governments //Records Management Journal. – 2018. – Т. 28. – №. 1. – С. 18-46;

Dubbink, Wim, Johan Graafland, and Luc Van Liedekerke. "CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organisations." Journal of business ethics 82 (2008): 391-406;

Kietzmann, Jan H., et al. "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media." Business horizons 54.3 (2011): 241-251;

Culnan, Mary J., Patrick J. McHugh, and Jesus I. Zubillaga. "How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value." MIS Quarterly Executive 9.4 (2010);

Gross, James J., and Ricardo F. Muñoz. "Emotion regulation and mental health." Clinical psychology: Science and practice 2.2 (1995): 151;

Bowie N. E., Jamal K. Privacy rights on the internet: self-regulation or government regulation? //Business Ethics Quarterly. – 2006. – Т. 16. – №. 3. – С. 323-342;

Weber I., Jia L. Internet and self-regulation in China: The cultural logic of controlled commodification //Media, Culture & Society. – 2007. – Т. 29. – №. 5. – С. 772-789;

Neill, Marlene S., and Mia Moody. "Who is responsible for what? Examining strategic roles in social media management." Public Relations Review 41.1 (2015): 109-118;

https://regulation.gov.uz/uz/d/29059.