VALIDATION OF THE POLICE LEGITIMACY SCALE: EVIDENCE FROM A CANADIAN SAMPLE
Craig Ewanation , Psychology – Carleton University, Ottawa, CanadaAbstract
The concept of police legitimacy has gained significant attention in criminology and criminal justice research, as it pertains to the public's perception of the police and their willingness to cooperate with law enforcement. The Police Legitimacy Scale (PLS) is a widely used measure designed to assess individuals' perceptions of police legitimacy. However, its validity and applicability in different cultural contexts, such as Canada, warrant empirical examination. This study aims to validate the Police Legitimacy Scale using a Canadian sample. Participants from diverse regions of Canada completed the PLS, along with additional measures assessing attitudes towards the police, trust in law enforcement, and perceptions of procedural justice. Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis were conducted to assess the scale's factorial structure and internal consistency. Furthermore, convergent and discriminant validity analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between the PLS and related constructs. The findings provide evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the Police Legitimacy Scale within the Canadian context, thus establishing its utility for future research on public perceptions of police legitimacy in Canada.
Keywords
Police legitimacy, scale validation, Canadian sample
References
Beetham, David. 2013. The Legitimation of Power. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar
Bentler, Peter M., and Douglas G. Bonett. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88(3): 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 Google Scholar
Berry, Sujata. 2016. Sammy Yatim family lawyer on his fight for police accountability. CBC News. http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-february-4-2016-1.3433226/sammy-yatim-family-lawyer-on-his-fight-for-police-accountability-1.3433310 Google Scholar
Bottoms, Anthony, and Justice Tankebe. 2012. Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 102(1): 119–70. Google Scholar
Bradford, Ben, Aziz Huq, Jonathan Jackson, and Benjamin Roberts. 2014. What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulations and Governance 8(2): 246–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12012 Google Scholar
Brown, Ben, and Reed Benedict. 2002. Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 25(3): 543–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210437032 Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics n.d. Community policing. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=81. Google Scholar
Cao, Liqun. 2014. Aboriginal people and confidence in the police. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 56(5): 499–526. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2013.e05 Link, Google Scholar
Cao, Liqun. 2015. Differentiating confidence in the police, trust in the police, and satisfaction with the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management 38(2): 239–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-12-2014-0127 Google Scholar
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2023 The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.