Management and Economics | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/Volume05Issue11-06

THE ONE-WINDOW ARCHITECTURE - A SYSTEM-LEVEL MODEL FOR INTEGRATED LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT IN EXPORT-ORIENTED B2B MANUFACTURING

Pavlo Morozov , Executive Director and Legal Representative, Guangzhou San Units Trading Limited, Guangzhou, China

Abstract

Export-oriented B2B manufacturing with multi-component products, biological raw-material variability and seasonal release cycles is conventionally organized as fragmented contract manufacturing that scatters design, engineering, production, quality control and logistics across independent contractors. Each handover leaks integration, and the burden of architectural decisions falls on a buyer who lacks cluster-side information. This paper presents a system-level overview of an alternative configuration — the one-window business architecture — developed by the author through years of operational practice in the Guangzhou bags and leather goods cluster, and applicable to the wider class of export-oriented B2B production it exemplifies. The system rests on five foundational properties: a single object of management (the collection), a single point of accountability, linear causal connectivity between phases, proactive governance through formal gate decisions (Gate 0 through Gate 6), and reproducibility as a configuration property rather than a stochastic outcome. Its anatomy is described across three levels — an architectural level of principles and decision criteria, a process level of phased lifecycle governance, and an executive level of suppliers, manufacturers and logistics operators. The paper develops six building blocks: the foundational properties, the three-level structure, the collection as object of management, the central control loop, the gate-based process structure, and the system boundaries. It then contrasts the architecture with the traditional OEM model and shows that predictability, reproducibility and margin stability emerge from the integrated configuration rather than from contractual specifications. The paper serves as the architectural reference for an intended series of companion papers.

Keywords

Architectural integration, business architecture, collection-level governance, contract manufacturing

References

G. Gereffi, J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon, "The governance of global value chains," Rev. Int. Polit. Econ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 78-104, Feb. 2005.

O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.

R. M. Henderson and K. B. Clark, "Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9-30, Mar. 1990.

M. L. Tushman and P. Anderson, "Technological discontinuities and organizational environments," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 439-465, Sep. 1986.

M. W. Maier, "Architecting principles for systems-of-systems," Syst. Eng., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 267-284, 1998.

H. A. Simon, "The architecture of complexity," Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 467-482, Dec. 1962.

P. R. Lawrence and J. W. Lorsch, "Differentiation and integration in complex organizations," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-47, Jun. 1967.

R. G. Cooper, "Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products," Bus. Horiz., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 44-54, May 1990.

J. R. Galbraith, Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1973.

S. Brusoni, A. Prencipe, and K. Pavitt, "Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 597-621, Dec. 2001.

M. Iansiti, "Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment," Res. Policy, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 521-542, Jul. 1995.

D. Selva, B. Cameron, and E. Crawley, "Patterns in system architecture decisions," Syst. Eng., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 477-497, Nov. 2016.

B. Levitt and J. G. March, "Organizational learning," Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 14, pp. 319-340, 1988.

R. Adner, "Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy," J. Manag., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 39-58, Jan. 2017.

P. Anderson, "Complexity theory and organization science," Organ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 216-232, Jun. 1999.

J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning," Organ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71-87, Feb. 1991.

J. Stark, Product Lifecycle Management (Volume 1): 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation, 4th ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022.

K. M. Eisenhardt and J. A. Martin, "Dynamic capabilities: What are they?," Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 21, no. 10-11, pp. 1105-1121, Oct.-Nov. 2000.

C. E. Helfat and M. A. Peteraf, "Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path," Strateg. Organ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 91-102, Feb. 2009.

C. E. Helfat and S. G. Winter, "Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world," Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1243-1250, Nov. 2011.

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Pavlo Morozov. (2026). THE ONE-WINDOW ARCHITECTURE - A SYSTEM-LEVEL MODEL FOR INTEGRATED LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT IN EXPORT-ORIENTED B2B MANUFACTURING. The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations, 5(11), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/Volume05Issue11-06 (Original work published November 30, 2023)