Management and Economics | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/Volume08Issue02-11

Evaluating how Multiple Intelligence Teaching Strategies Improve Science Competencies and Cognitive Profiles in Middle School Learners

Chandan Pal Singh , Department of Computer Science (Pedagogy), Zhanibekov university, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
Yerzhan Kerimbekov , Zhanibekov university, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
Tomas Cech , Palacký University Olomouc, Czechia

Abstract

This study is based on the low attention of teachers on students’ potential compared to academic ability. Teachers’ focus on academic ability as the sole determinant of successful learning causes learning to be incapable of developing the students’ potential called Multiple Intelligences (MI), whereas they can be applied to make students enjoy learning as well as develop the potential and thinking skills of students. To overcome this problem, a teaching strategy based on Multiple Intelligences was developed in science lesson. The effectiveness of the teaching strategy was evaluated by pretest-posttest-control-group design. The samples consisted of 124 of junior high school students. Data were obtained from Multiple intelligences test, Science Process Skills (SPS) test, and observation sheets. The hypotheses were tested using t-test, simple linear regression, and one-way ANOVA. The study revealed that Multiple Intelligences strategy has an effect on and can be a significant predictor of the development of students’ Multiple intelligences. This study showed an improvement of the SPS, specifically in the questioning ability. The results of this study will change the teaching strategy in the future, from academic ability oriented to be multiple intelligences oriented and focus on the potential of each student.

Keywords

Teaching strategy, Multiple Intelligences, Science Process Skills

References

Abdi, A., Laei, S., & Ahmadyan, H. (2013). The effect of teaching strategy based on multiple intelligences on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 281 284.

Arends, R.I. (2008). Learning to Teach (7th ed.). Translated by Helly Prajitno Soetjipto & Sri Mulyantini Soetjipto. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Armstrong, T. (2004). Multiple Intelligences in the classroom (2nd ed.). Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Campbell, L. (1997). How teachers interpret MI theory. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 14-19.

Celikoz, M. (2017). Multiple intelligence distribution of prospective teachers: the case at Yıldız Technical University NE University, Kemal Akman Vocational School. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(2). 206

Chuang, T.Y., Su, S.H., & Tsao, Y.P. (2010). Using handheld gaming device to increase multiple intelligences with digital puzzle game. Wong, S.L. et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education (571 573). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

Davis, L. (2004). Using the theory of multiple intelligences to increase fourth-grade students’ academic achievement in science. An Applied Dissertation Submitted to the Fischler School of Education and Human Services Nova Southeastern University. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED491477

Eberle, S.G. (2011). Playing with the multiple intelligences how play helps them grow. American Journal of Play, 14(1), 19-51.

Emmiyati, N., Rasyid, M.A., Rahman, M.A., Arsyad, A., & Dirawan, G.D. (2014). Multiple intelligences profiles of junior secondary school students in Indonesia. International Education Studies, 7(11), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n11p103

Gagne, R.M. (1977). The Conditions of Learning Third Edition. New York: Holt Saunders International Editions.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books Hons of Learning Harper Collins Publ. Inc.

Gaundare, V.S., Yeole, A.D. (2014). An experimental study on factors affecting the multiple intelligences of MBA students with the help of informational technology. IBMRD’s Journal of Management and Research, 3(1), 94-103.

Ghamrawi, N. (2014). Multiple Intelligences and ESL Teaching and Learning: An Investigation in KG II Classrooms in One Private School in Beirut, Lebanon. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13513021

Ginnis, P. (2002). Teacher’s Toolkit raise Classroom Achievement with Strategies for Every Learner. Wales: Crown House Publ Ltd.

Griggs, L., Barney, S., Brown-Sederberg, J., Collins, E., Keith, S., & Iannacci, L. (2009). Varying pedagogy to address student multiple intelligences. Human Architecture, 7(1), 55-60.

Hanafin, J. (2014). Multiple intelligences theory, action research and teacher professional development: the Irish MI project. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n4.8

Hergenhahn, B.R., & Olson, M.H. (2009). Theories of Learning (Teori Belajar). Translated by Tri Wibowo. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. San Juan, CA: Kegan Cooperative Learning.

Linn, R.L., & Gronlund, N.E. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. Ohio: Prentice Hall.

Madkour, M., & Mohamed, R. (2016). Identifying college students’ multiple intelligences to enhance motivation and language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 92-107. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p92

McClellan, J.A., & Conti, G.J. (2008). Identifying the multiple intelligences of your students. Journal of Adult Education, 37(1), 13-31.

Nurulwahida, A., & Azman, A. (2014). The effectiveness of the modular enrichment activities based on Gardner multiple intelligences and Sternberg thinking skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 5 (2), 55-62.

Nurulwahida, A., Yaacob, A., & Shaik-Abdullah, S. (2016). The multiple intelligence-based enrichment module on the development of human potential: examining its impact and the views of teachers. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 175-200.

Othman., I. (2013). Elements of multiple intelligences in teaching and learning activities and the effect on students’ achievement based on gender. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2(3), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0232832

Owolabi, T., & Okebukola, F. (2009). Improving the reading ability of science students through study groups and multiple intelligences. Online Submission, US-China Education Review, 6(2), 38-44.

Padilla, M.J. (1990). The science process skills. Research masters to the science teachers. Reston VA: NARST Publication.

Pociask, A., & Settles, J.S. (2007). Increasing Student Achievement through Brain Based Studies. Master Thesis in Teaching and Leadership saint Xavier University Chicago, Illinois.

Samsudin, M.A., Haniza, N.M., Talib, C.A., & Ibrahim, H.M.M., (2015). The relationship between multiple intelligences with preferred science teaching and science process skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1), 53-59.

Sánchez-Martín, J., Álvarez-Gragera, G.J., Dávila-Acedo, M.A., & Mellado, V. (2017). Teaching technology: from knowing to feeling enhancing emotional and content acquisition performance through Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory in technology and design lessons. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(1), 58-79. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.238

Santrock (2004). Educational Psychology (2nd ed.). Dallas: Mc Graw Hill Co.

Schwert, A. (2004). Using the Theory of Multiple Intelligences to Enhance Science Education. Thesis for The Master of Education degree in Secondary Education. Ohio: University of Toledo.

Sen, C., & Vekli, G.S. (2016). The impact of inquiry based instruction on science process skills and self efficacy perceptions of pre-service science teachers at a university level biology laboratory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 603-612. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040319

Slavin, R.E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Pearson Education.

Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2003). Teaching for successful intelligence: principles, procedures, and practices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2/3), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700206

Sternberg, R.J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Science, 7(2), 269-287 (published online). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044629

Streiner, D.L, Norman, G.R. (2000). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Talib, A., & Bini-Kailani, I. (2014). Problem based learning in cooperative situation (PBLCS) and its impact on development of personal intelligence. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education., 3(4), 236-244. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v3i4.6969

Thompson, B.R., & MacDougall, G.D. (2002). Intelligent teaching. The Science Teacher, 69(1), 44-48.

Ting, K.L., & Siew, N.M. (2014). Effects of outdoor school ground lessons on students’ science process skills and scientific curiosity. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(4), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n4p96

Widiana, I.W., & Jampel, I.N. (2016). Improving students’ creative thinking and achievement through the implementation of multiple intelligence approach with mind mapping. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(3), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i3.4546

Yurt, E., & Polat, S. (2015). The effectiveness of multiple intelligence applications on academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 84-122. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.75161

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Chandan Pal Singh, Yerzhan Kerimbekov, & Tomas Cech. (2026). Evaluating how Multiple Intelligence Teaching Strategies Improve Science Competencies and Cognitive Profiles in Middle School Learners. The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations, 8(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/Volume08Issue02-11