This article explores integrating flexible project management methodologies into traditional standards to adapt to modern dynamic environments. Agile methodologies, initially invented for software development, emphasize adaptability, iterative processes, and close collaboration with stakeholders. Meanwhile, traditional standards, such as PMBOK and PRINCE2, are characterized by a predefined flow focused on stability and detailed planning. The study examines the feasibility of combining Agile and traditional methodologies within hybrid project management models. The focus is placed on achieving a balance between flexibility and structure, as well as addressing challenges related to organizational change. The article highlights the importance of transitioning to cross-functional teams and adapting cultural paradigms for the successful implementation of hybrid solutions. Empirical data suggest that projects employing hybrid approaches demonstrate increased efficiency, improved stakeholder engagement, and reduced risks. However, implementing such models involves challenges, including resistance to change and the need for personnel training. The findings indicate that hybrid models have the potential to become a universal project management standard, combining the strengths of traditional and Agile approaches to achieve sustainable success in high-uncertainty environments. This article will be valuable to project managers, program managers or similar considering the application of Agile methodologies within project execution.

project management, flexible methodologies, Agile, traditional methodologies, hybrid models, Agile-Waterfall, ScrumBAN, PMBOK

Brooks, Frederick P. No Silver Bullet — Essence and Accident in Software Engineering – // URL: https://www.cs.unc.edu/techreports/86-020.pdf – Publication date: 1986.

Boehm B., Turner R. – Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed – Publication date: 2003

Hybrid Project Management: Combining Agile and Traditional Approaches / A. Tanzeem, S.R. Chetan, C. Subrahmanyasarma [et al.] // Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research electronic journal. – URL: https://dlabi.org/index.php/journal/article/view/93. – Publication date: 2020.

Kutsch, E. Project Resilience / E. Kutsch, M. Hall. – London Routledge, 2016. – 236 p.

Špundak, M. Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion? / M. Špundak // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences : electronic journal. – URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281402196X. – Date of publication: 2014.

Timinger, H. A Framework for the Construction and Tailoring of Engineering Development Process Models / H. Timinger, M. Schmidtner, F. Reiche // IEEE: electronic journal. – URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9674777. – Publication date: 2023.

How project management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile / D.C. Lalic, B. Lalic, D. Milan [et al.] // International Journal of Managing Projects in Business: electronic journal. – URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijmpb-04-2021-0108/full/html. – Publication date: 2022.

Kent Beck et al. Manifesto for Agile Software Development // URL: https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html – Publication date: 2001

Buganová, K. Risk management in traditional and agile project management / K. Buganová, J. Šimíčková // Transportation Research Procedia: electronic journal. – URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146519303060. – Publication date: 2020.