Articles
| Open Access | Transparency Is A Key Indicator Of The Activity Of Sovereign Wealth Funds
I. T. Jumaniyazov , PhD In Economical Sciences, Associate Professor Department Of Finance, Tashkent Institute Of Finance, Tashkent, UzbekistanAbstract
This article examines and analyzes the criteria for maximum transparency, which is the main criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of sovereign funds. Two globally recognized methods for assessing the maximum transparency of sovereign wealth funds have been analyzed. The Santiago Principles and the Linaburg-Madwell Transparency Index, approved by 26 member countries of the International Monetary Fund and based on generally accepted rules, have been studied and analyzed in detail. Foreign experience in ensuring maximum transparency of sovereign wealth funds has been studied. A number of problems in ensuring the maximum transparency of the Fund's activities, which are the main criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the Fund for Reconstruction and Development in our country, were analyzed and scientific and practical suggestions and recommendations were made to ensure maximum transparency of the Fund's activities.
Keywords
Sovereign fund, Fund for Reconstruction and Development, Transparency Index
References
Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-4947 of February 7, 2017 "On the Strategy for further development of the Republic of Uzbekistan".
PF-5614 of January 8, 2019 "On additional measures to further develop the economy and increase the effectiveness of economic policy", January 17, 2019 "Action Strategy for the five priority areas of development of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2017-2021" Active investment and Decree No. PF-5635 "On the state program for the year of social development".
Presidential Decree No. PP-3437 "On the introduction of a new procedure for the formation and financing of state development programs of the Republic of Uzbekistan", December 18, 2017.
Speech of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev at a video conference on the organization of work on the basis of the new procedure for the formation and financing of state development programs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, January 17, 2018.
Пупынин К.Н. Применение зарубежного опыта функционирования суверенных инвестиционных фондов для Резервного фонда и Фонда национального благосостояния РФ. Автореф. дисс....кан. экон.наук. – Москва, 2011. – 24 с.
Васин Е.А. Повышение эффективности управления суверенными фондами в Российской Федерации. Автореф. дисс....кан. экон.наук. – Москва, 2015. – 28 с.
Sovereign Wealth Funds: Generally Accepted Principles and Practices (Santiago Principles) / International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds. — 2008. http://www.iwg-swf.org/pubs/eng/santiagoprinciples.
Суверен фондлар институтининг расмий сайти. – Sovereign Wealth Funds Institute (SWFI) http://www.swfinstitute.org/fund-rankings.
Jin ZHANG (2016) Enhancing the Transparency of Sovereign Wealth Funds: From the Middle East to China, Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 10:1, 90-120, DOI: 10.1080/19370679.2016.12023279
Dixon, A. (2014: winter). Enhancing the transparency dialogue in the “Santiago Principles” for sovereign wealth funds, Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 37, Issue 2.
Bortolotti, B. (2013: September 5). The Sovereign Wealth Fund Discount: Evidence from Public Equity Investments, Retrieved December 1, 2015
Ahmadov, I., Tsani, S., & Aslanli, K. (2009). Sovereign Wealth Funds as the emerging players in the global financial arena: Characteristics, risks and governance. Public Finance Monitoring Centre and Revenue Watch.
Jumaniyazov I.T. “The progressive foreign experiments in the activity of sovereign wealth funds”. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2021) 58(1): Pages 4928-4935.
Jumaniyazov I.T. Impact of Development Finance Institutions on Economic Growth: Implications for Reconstruction and Development Fund of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration Volume 4 Issue 2, January 2018, Pages 84-88.
Jumaniyazov I.T. The significance of Uzbekistan reconstruction and development fund’s financial capital on economic growth of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom ISSN 2348 0386 Vol. VII, Issue 4, April 2019. http://ijecm.co.uk/volume-vii-issue-4.
Jumaniyazov I.T. Evaluation criteria for the efficiency of sovereign funds. Global science and innovations 2019: Central Asia. International scientific conference. – Nur-Sultan (Kazakhstan), 2019 – 340 p. P. 226-229.
Jumaniyazov I.T. The impact of Uzbekistan Reconstruction and development fund’s expenditure on GDP growth. Science, research, development №16. Monografiya pokonferencyjna. – Barcelona, 2019. P. 50-54.
Truman, Edwin M. (2008). A Blueprint for SWF Best Practices. Policy Brief 08‐3 (April). Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Allie E. Bagnall and Edwin M. Truman. Progress on Sovereign Wealth Fund Transparency and Accountability: An Updated SWF Scoreboard // Peterson Institute for International Economics. – 2013.
Алектораская М.М. Анализ суверенного фонда РФ // Проблемы региональной экономики: электронный научный журнал. – 2013. – 23 марта.
Devlin W., Brummitt B. A Few Sovereigns More: The Rise of Sovereign Wealth Funds. EconomicRound-up (Spring 2007. – P. 119-136.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2021 The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.