Integrative Network Pharmacology and Structure-Based Molecular Docking for the Computational Identification of CHEK2-Targeting Phytochemicals in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Sana Rahman , Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, UP, India Shrijal Singh , Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, UP, India Sanjana Mishra , Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, UP, India Prachi Srivastava , Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, UP, IndiaAbstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive forms of breast cancer and it is very difficult to treat because it lacks the common hormone receptors which is used in targeted therapies. The main aim of this study was identifying an important target gene involved in TNBC and to evaluate the potential of selected natural compounds using computational approaches. Genes related to TNBC they were collected from the Gene Cards database, and the most relevant genes were selected for further analysis. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was then constructed and analysed using Cytoscape software. Based on network parameters such as degree and betweenness centrality, CHEK2 (Checkpoint kinase 2) was identified as a main target gene because of its strong interactions with other associated genes. Five phytochemicals-curcumin, piperine, cinnamaldehyde, 6-gingerol, and allicin were selected from previously published studies for further investigation. The three-dimensional structure of the CHEK2 protein was obtained using PDB database and evaluated before docking analysis. Molecular docking was then performed using the Dock Thor with a blind docking approach to study the interaction of these compounds with the target protein. The docking results showed that all phytochemicals exhibited stable binding with the protein. Among them, curcumin demonstrated the highest binding affinity (−9.386 kcal/mol), followed by piperine (−8.847 kcal/mol), cinnamaldehyde (−8.12 kcal/mol), 6-gingerol (−7.933 kcal/mol), and allicin (−7.855 kcal/mol). These results indicates that curcumin may have stronger interaction potential with the CHEK2 protein. In conclusion, the study highlights the importance of network-based target identification and it supports the potential role of natural phytochemicals, particularly curcumin, in TNBC treatment. Further experimental validation is required to confirm these findings.
Keywords
TNBC, CHEK2, molecular docking, phytochemicals, network pharmacology, curcumin
References
Aoki, K. F., & Kanehisa, M. (2005). Using the KEGG database resource. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 1(1), 1.12.1–1.12.43.
Barzaman, K., Karami, J., Zarei, Z., Hosseinzadeh, A., Kazemi, M. H., Moradi-Kalbolandi, S., Safari, E., & Farahmand, L. (2020). Breast cancer: Biology, biomarkers, and treatments. International Immunopharmacology, 84, 106535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106535
Bodewes, F. T. H., van Asselt, A. A., Dorrius, M. D., Greuter, M. J. W., & de Bock, G. H. (2022). Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Breast, 66, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007
Conde, D. M. (2024). CHEK2 variants, breast cancer, and implications for management: A narrative review. Translational Breast Cancer Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-24-53
Derakhshan, F., & Reis-Filho, J. S. (2022). Pathogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, 17, 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-042420-093238
Howard, F. M., & Olopade, O. I. (2021). Epidemiology of triple-negative breast cancer: A review. Current Oncology Reports, 23(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000500
Kashyap, D., Pal, D., Sharma, R., Garg, V. K., Goel, N., Koundal, D., Zaguia, A., Koundal, S., & Belay, A. (2022). Global increase in breast cancer incidence: Risk factors and preventive measures. BioMed Research International, 2022, 9605439. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9605439
Katsura, C., Ogunmwonyi, I., Kankam, H. K. N., & Saha, S. (2022). Breast cancer: Presentation, investigation and management. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 83(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2021.0459
Kenemans, P., Verstraeten, R. A., & Verheijen, R. H. M. (2004). Oncogenic pathways in hereditary and sporadic breast cancer. Maturitas, 49(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.005
Khan, T., Ali, M., Khan, A., Nisar, P., Jan, S. A., Afridi, S., & Shinwari, Z. K. (2020). Anticancer plants: A review of the active phytochemicals, applications in animal models, and regulatory aspects. Biomolecules, 10(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010047
Kim, S. (2016). Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2016.1216967
Li, Y., Zhang, H., Merkher, Y., Chen, L., Liu, N., Leonov, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer. Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 15, 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01341-0
Pinzi, L., & Rastelli, G. (2019). Molecular docking: Shifting paradigms in drug discovery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(18), 4331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184331
Qian, H., Ali, H., Karri, V., Low, J. T., Ashley, D. M., Heimberger, A. B., Godley, L. A., Sonabend, A. M., & Dmello, C. (2024). Beyond DNA damage response: Immunomodulatory attributes of CHEK2 in solid tumors. Oncotarget, 15, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28740
Saito, R., Smoot, M. E., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P. L., Lotia, S., Pico, A. R., Bader, G. D., & Ideker, T. (2012). A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nature methods, 9(11), 1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2212.
Srivastava, N., Mishra, B. N., & Srivastava, P. (2018). Protein network analysis to prioritize key genes and pathway for stress-mediated neurodegeneration. Open Bioinformatics Journal, 11(1), 240–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1875036201811010240
Stolarova, L., Kleiblova, P., Janatova, M., Soukupova, J., Zemankova, P., Macurek, L., & Kleibl, Z. (2020). CHEK2 germline variants in cancer predisposition: Stalemate rather than checkmate. Cells, 9(12), 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122675
Unlu, A., Nayir, E., Kalenderoglu, M. D., Kirca, O., & Ozdogan, M. (2016). Curcumin (turmeric) and cancer. Journal of BUON, 21(5), 1050–1060.
Von Mering, C., Jensen, L. J., Snel, B., Hooper, S. D., Krupp, M., Foglierini, M., Jouffre, N., Huynen, M. A., & Bork, P. (2005). STRING: Known and predicted protein–protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(Suppl. 1), D433–D437. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki005
Yin, L., Duan, J.-J., Bian, X.-W., & Yu, S.-C. (2020). Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress. Breast Cancer Research, 22, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-01296-5
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sana Rahman, Shrijal Singh, Sanjana Mishra, Prachi Srivastava

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Applied Sciences
| Open Access |
DOI: