AI-Driven Risk Prediction and Systemic Stability: A Framework for Strengthening U.S. Financial Markets
Aftab Uddin , Department of Finance Fox School of Business Temple University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United StatesAbstract
Background: Over the last five years, U.S. financial markets have experienced repeated episodes of instability, highlighting the growing importance of detecting algorithmic contagion and systemic risk at an early stage. As automated trading and data-driven financial decision-making expand, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) offers a promising approach for identifying hidden risk patterns.
Purpose: This study aims to examine how XAI can improve the detection of algorithmic contagion and support systemic risk mitigation in U.S. financial markets.
Methods: The study used a quantitative longitudinal secondary-data design based on five years of daily market data from the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) from 2020 to 2025. Engineered time-series features supported logistic regression and random forest models, while explainability techniques identified key predictors of contagion-sensitive market states.
Results: Contagion-sensitive periods were concentrated in 2022. In walk-forward validation, logistic regression achieved 0.773 accuracy, 0.311 recall, and 0.175 precision, while random forest achieved 0.821 accuracy, 0.189 recall, and 0.198 precision. In holdout testing, random forest reached 0.905 accuracy but 0.000 recall and precision, highlighting the difficulty of predicting rare stress events.
Conclusion: The study concludes that XAI can strengthen systemic risk monitoring by making machine-learning predictions more transparent and decision-relevant. While predictive performance remains constrained by limited market variables and daily-frequency data, the framework demonstrates strong potential for improving financial surveillance.
Keywords
Explainable artificial intelligence, Algorithmic contagion, Systemic risk, U.S, financial markets, Machine learning
References
Agatón Lombera, D. I., Cardoso López, D. A., López Cabrera, J. A., & Nuñez Mora, J. A. (2024). Market reactions to US financial indices: A comparison of the GFC versus the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Economies, 12(7), 165.
Ahmed, I., Jeon, G., & Piccialli, F. (2022). From artificial intelligence to explainable artificial intelligence in industry 4.0: a survey on what, how, and where. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 18(8), 5031-5042.
Ahmmed, M. J. (2025). Systematic Review and Quantitative Evaluation of Advanced Machine Learning Frameworks for Credit Risk Assessment, Fraud Detection, And Dynamic Pricing in US Financial Systems. International Journal of Business and Economics Insights, 5(3), 1329-1369.
Åström, W., & Pettersson, G. (2025). The Role of Portfolio Overlap and Network Centrality: Systemic risk in Swedish mutual funds. In.
Cesa-Bianchi, A., Thwaites, G., & Vicondoa, A. (2020). Monetary policy transmission in the United Kingdom: A high frequency identification approach. European Economic Review, 123, 103375.
Che-Castaldo, J. P., Cousin, R., Daryanto, S., Deng, G., Feng, M.-L. E., Gupta, R. K., Hong, D., McGranaghan, R. M., Owolabi, O. O., & Qu, T. (2021). Critical Risk Indicators (CRIs) for the electric power grid: a survey and discussion of interconnected effects. Environment Systems and Decisions, 41(4), 594-615.
Chen, M. (2025). Decision Dynamics Under Uncertainty: Complex-Systems Models for Individual Risk Choices and Organizational Tech-Shock Responses ETH Zurich].
Chen, M., Li, N., Zheng, L., Huang, D., & Wu, B. (2022). Dynamic correlation of market connectivity, risk spillover and abnormal volatility in stock price. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 587, 126506.
Chhabra, D., & Gupta, M. (2020). Market efficiency and calendar anomalies in commodity futures markets: A review. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 33(2), 263-277.
Chung, S., Animesh, A., Han, K., & Pinsonneault, A. (2020). Financial returns to firms’ communication actions on firm-initiated social media: Evidence from Facebook business pages. Information Systems Research, 31(1), 258-285.
Coupez, E. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Trading on Stock Market Behavior, Volatility, and Stability. Volatility, and Stability (August 13, 2025).
EL OUBANI, A. (2022). Market efficiency dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Revue des Etudes Multidisciplinaires en Sciences Economiques et Sociales, 7(2).
French, S., Dickerson, A., & Mulder, R. A. (2024). A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes final examinations in higher education. Higher Education, 88(3), 893-918.
Georgousis, S., Kenning, M. P., & Xie, X. (2021). Graph deep learning: State of the art and challenges. Ieee Access, 9, 22106-22140.
Gill, N., Hall, P., Montgomery, K., & Schmidt, N. (2020). A responsible machine learning workflow with focus on interpretable models, post-hoc explanation, and discrimination testing. Information, 11(3), 137.
Gong, X.-L., Liu, J.-M., Xiong, X., & Zhang, W. (2022). Research on stock volatility risk and investor sentiment contagion from the perspective of multi-layer dynamic network. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102359.
Guo, W., Wang, Y., Huang, Z., & Zhang, C. (2025). Trading under uncertainty: A distribution-based strategy for futures markets using futurequant transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05595.
Harré, M. S., Eremenko, A., Glavatskiy, K., Hopmere, M., Pinheiro, L., Watson, S., & Crawford, L. (2021). Complexity economics in a time of crisis: Heterogeneous agents, interconnections, and contagion. Systems, 9(4), 73.
Hasan, T., & Jahan, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Ethical Challenges in Financial Services: A Framework for Responsible Data Governance and Algorithmic Transparency. International Journal of Data Science, Big Data Analytics, and Predictive Modeling, 14(8), 16-36.
Herring, R., & Walczyński, M. (2024). Emotions, stress and related phenomena in public service interpreter and translator education and training. FITISPos International Journal, 11(1), 9-27.
Kacprzyk, K., Liu, T., & van der Schaar, M. (2024). Towards transparent time series forecasting. The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations,
Kahan, M., & Rock, E. B. (2020). Index funds and corporate governance: Let shareholders be shareholders. BuL rev., 100, 1771.
Kashyap, S., & Iveroth, E. (2021). Transparency and accountability influences of regulation on risk control: the case of a Swedish bank. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(2), 475-508.
Komati, D. (2025). Real-Time AI Systems for Fraud Detection and Credit Risk Management: A Framework for Financial Institutions. IJSAT-International Journal on Science and Technology, 16(1).
Leung, K. K., Rooke, C., Smith, J., Zuberi, S., & Volkovs, M. (2021). Temporal dependencies in feature importance for time series predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14317.
Liu, A., Chen, J., Yang, S. Y., & Hawkes, A. G. (2020). The flow of information in trading: An entropy approach to market regimes. Entropy, 22(9), 1064.
Mahesh, M. (2025). Portfolio and Risk Management. LawFoyer Int'l J. Doctrinal Legal Rsch., 3, 759.
Marzouki, M. M. (2024). Towards a Reinvigoration of the Risk Management Framework for the Scope of Upgrading Prudential Surveillance. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 13(3).
Meng, K., & Li, S. (2021). The adaptive market hypothesis and high frequency trading. PloS one, 16(12), e0260724.
Meng, S., & Chen, Y. (2023). Market volatility spillover, network diffusion, and financial systemic risk management: Financial modeling and empirical study. Mathematics, 11(6), 1396.
Nestor, T. (2025). AI Models Are Not Conscious and Are Massively Inefficient, Causing Complexity and Scalability Bottlenecks to Artificial General Superintelligence Risking Technological Singularity and Loss of Societal Dynamism or Institutional Collapse and Renewal. Causing Complexity and Scalability Bottlenecks to Artificial General Superintelligence Risking Technological Singularity and Loss of Societal Dynamism or Institutional Collapse and Renewal (June 16, 2025).
Qi, L. (2023). On Nonlinearities in Financial Market Co-Movements The Australian National University (Australia)].
Ran, M., Tang, Z., Chen, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). Early warning of systemic risk in stock market based on EEMD-LSTM. PloS one, 19(5), e0300741.
Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches for transparency and accountability in financial decision-making. Available at SSRN 4640316.
Recchia, M. (2021). FINTECH COMPANIES: INNOVATION, ALGORITHMS AND CUSTOMER CENTRIC PERSPECTIVE-A cross-sectional study on algorithmic trading in the Fintech industry.
Rissy, Y. Y. W. (2021). The stakeholder model: its relevance, concept, and application in the Indonesian banking sector. Journal of Banking Regulation, 22(3), 219-231.
Sadeghi, A. (2025). Contagion Dynamics in Traditional and Decentralized Finance Stevens Institute of Technology].
Sanz Martin, L., Parra Dominguez, J., Corchado, J. M., Zafra-Gómez, E., Castillo-Ramos, V., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2025). Recent evolution and growth of AI and advanced technologies in accounting and finance: systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 1-42.
Serrano, A. S. (2020). High-frequency trading and systemic risk: A structured review of findings and policies. Review of Economics, 71(3), 169-195.
Shahzad, S. J. H., Bouri, E., Kristoufek, L., & Saeed, T. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the US equity sectors: Evidence from quantile return spillovers. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 14.
Siddiqui, S. A., Mercier, D., Dengel, A., & Ahmed, S. (2021). Tsinsight: A local-global attribution framework for interpretability in time series data. Sensors, 21(21), 7373.
Silvio, F. (2022). Time series analysis using explainable AI University of Malta].
Sujatha, D., Sudheer, A. K., & Balasundaram, E. (2025). Black swan dynamics: a network-based framework for systemic risk detection and mitigation: D. Sujatha et al. Risk Management, 27(4), 24.
Sun, T. (2025). Systemic risk of systemically important financial institutions in the post‐2008 global financial crisis era: A tail risk network analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 92(4), 950-977.
Theissler, A., Spinnato, F., Schlegel, U., & Guidotti, R. (2022). Explainable AI for time series classification: a review, taxonomy and research directions. Ieee Access, 10, 100700-100724.
Thirunagalingam, A. (2022). Enhancing Data Governance Through Explainable AI: Bridging Transparency and Automation. Available at SSRN 5047713.
Tzagkarakis, G., Lydaki, E., & Maurer, F. (2024). Quantifying the Predictive Capacity of Dynamic Graph Measures on Systemic and Tail Risk. Computational Economics, 1-31.
Verma, R., & Pandiya, D. K. (2024). The role of AI and machine learning in US financial market predictions: Progress, obstacles, and consequences. International Journal of Global Innovations and Solutions (IJGIS).
Wang, T., Zhao, S., Zhu, G., & Zheng, H. (2021). A machine learning-based early warning system for systemic banking crises. Applied economics, 53(26), 2974-2992.
Yan, H., Liu, B., Zhu, X., & Wu, Y. (2024). Systemic risk monitoring model from the perspective of public information arrival. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 72, 102141.
Yeo, W. J., Van Der Heever, W., Mao, R., Cambria, E., Satapathy, R., & Mengaldo, G. (2025). A comprehensive review on financial explainable AI. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(6), 189.
Zhou, X., & Liu, H. (2025). Cross-Market Risk Spillovers and Tail Dependence Between US and Chinese Technology-Related Equity Markets. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(4), 242.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aftab Uddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.


Applied Sciences
| Open Access |
DOI: