Applied Sciences | Open Access |

Real-Time AI in Credit Scoring: Transforming Risk Assessment, Governance, and Compliance in Digital Financial Platforms

Prof. Martina L. Kovács , Department of Finance and Digital Innovation, University of Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

The accelerating integration of artificial intelligence into financial systems has fundamentally altered the epistemological, operational, and governance foundations of credit scoring, risk management, and regulatory compliance. Contemporary loan platforms increasingly rely on real-time data processing architectures, advanced machine learning models, and automated decision-making systems to evaluate borrower creditworthiness, predict default probabilities, and align lending practices with complex compliance regimes. This transformation is neither linear nor uncontroversial. It raises persistent questions regarding transparency, explainability, ethical accountability, institutional risk, and the evolving role of human judgment in financial intermediation. Against this backdrop, the present research develops a comprehensive, theoretically grounded, and empirically informed analysis of AI-driven real-time credit scoring systems and their intersection with broader risk and compliance frameworks.

Drawing extensively on interdisciplinary literature spanning financial risk management, artificial intelligence governance, legal theory, and compliance studies, the article situates real-time credit scoring within a historical continuum of quantitative risk assessment practices while emphasizing the qualitative rupture introduced by adaptive, self-learning systems. Particular attention is given to the operational logic of real-time credit scoring models, including data ingestion pipelines, algorithmic learning processes, and feedback mechanisms that continuously recalibrate risk assessments. The study critically examines how these systems reshape traditional notions of credit risk by privileging behavioral, transactional, and alternative data over static financial indicators, thereby enabling dynamic and context-sensitive lending decisions. This analysis is anchored in contemporary scholarship on AI-enabled credit platforms, including recent empirical contributions that document the performance, scalability, and governance challenges of real-time risk analytics in digital lending ecosystems (Modadugu et al., 2025).

Methodologically, the research adopts a qualitative-analytical design grounded in systematic literature synthesis, conceptual modeling, and comparative institutional analysis. Rather than presenting new quantitative datasets, the article constructs interpretive insights by triangulating findings from financial risk literature, AI governance frameworks, and compliance-oriented policy analyses. This approach enables a nuanced examination of both the capabilities and limitations of AI-driven credit scoring, particularly in relation to model opacity, bias propagation, regulatory alignment, and systemic risk amplification. The results reveal that while real-time AI systems significantly enhance predictive accuracy and operational efficiency, they simultaneously intensify governance complexity and compliance burdens, especially in jurisdictions with evolving regulatory expectations around algorithmic accountability.

The discussion advances the argument that effective integration of AI into credit scoring and risk management requires a reconceptualization of governance structures, moving from static control mechanisms toward adaptive, lifecycle-oriented oversight models. The article further explores the implications of AI-driven risk analytics for compliance leadership, legal accountability, and organizational culture, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between technologists, risk managers, legal experts, and regulators. By synthesizing insights across domains, this research contributes to ongoing scholarly debates on the future of financial risk governance in the age of artificial intelligence and offers a robust conceptual foundation for future empirical and policy-oriented studies.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, real-time credit scoring, risk management, compliance governance

References

Artificial Intelligence in Risk Management. KPMG United Arab Emirates.

Auccahuasi, W., et al. (2022). Methodology for the use of machine learning, applied in predicting the level of success in legal cases. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3146.

Badman, A. (2024). AI risk management and AI governance. IBM.

Faheem, M. A. (2021). AI-driven risk assessment models: Revolutionizing credit scoring and default prediction. IRE Journals, 5(3).

Ghatge, J. (2024). AI contract review vs. traditional contract review: A comparative analysis. SpeedLegal.

Kira Systems. (2020). AI-driven contract analysis in perspective and in practice.

Leeway Hertz. (n.d.). AI in risk management: Applications, benefits, solution and implementation.

MetricStream. (n.d.). The ultimate guide to AI in risk management.

Modadugu, J. K., Prabhala Venkata, R. T., & Prabhala Venkata, K. (2025). Real-time credit scoring and risk analysis: Integrating AI and data processing in loan platforms. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(6), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i6.9617

Moody’s. (2024). How can artificial intelligence transform risk and compliance.

Resolver. (2024). The future of risk & compliance: 5 key insights for the modern leader.

Sievo Blog. (2023). 10 challenges contract management is facing and how to overcome them.

Simmons, D. C., et al. (n.d.). Qualitative and quantitative approaches to risk assessment. DRMKC.

Surden, H. (2024). ChatGPT, AI large language models, and law. Fordham Law Review, 92.

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Prof. Martina L. Kovács. (2025). Real-Time AI in Credit Scoring: Transforming Risk Assessment, Governance, and Compliance in Digital Financial Platforms. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(10), 159–166. Retrieved from https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas/article/view/7253