
Integrating the House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) into the Global Food System: A Review of Production, Processing, and Sustainability
Dr. Anja Petrova , Department of Food Science and Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands Prof. Kenji Tanaka , Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan Dr. Samuel O. Adebayo , Department of Entomology and Agricultural Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, NigeriaAbstract
: Background: The escalating global demand for protein, coupled with the significant environmental footprint of conventional livestock farming, necessitates the exploration of sustainable alternatives. Edible insects, particularly the house cricket (Acheta domesticus), have emerged as a highly promising source of nutrition to enhance global food security. However, its integration into mainstream food systems, especially in Western societies, is fraught with challenges.
Scope and Approach: This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current state of the Acheta domesticus food industry. It synthesizes existing literature on cricket farming systems, processing technologies, nutritional composition, and sustainability metrics. Furthermore, it critically examines the primary technological, regulatory, and socio-cultural challenges that hinder its widespread adoption as a human food source.
Key Findings: Acheta domesticus presents an excellent nutritional profile, rich in high-quality protein, essential amino acids, fatty acids, and vital micronutrients. Environmentally, cricket farming is significantly more sustainable than traditional livestock, demonstrating a higher feed conversion efficiency and lower greenhouse gas emissions, as well as reduced land and water requirements. Key processing techniques, such as drying and milling, transform crickets into versatile food ingredients like protein powder for use in various products. However, the industry's growth is constrained by several barriers. These include a lack of large-scale, automated farming technologies; complex and evolving regulatory landscapes, such as the European Union's Novel Food framework; safety concerns related to allergenicity; and profound socio-cultural resistance, or 'neophobia,' among consumers.
Conclusion: The house cricket holds substantial potential to contribute to a more sustainable and secure global food system. Realizing this potential hinge on concerted efforts in research and development to advance farming and processing technologies, establish clear international regulatory standards, and implement effective marketing and educational strategies to overcome consumer hesitancy.
Keywords
Acheta domesticus, entomophagy, sustainable protein, food security
References
Shaheen, S.; Ahmad, M.; Haroon, N. Edible Wild Plants: An Alternative Approach to Food Security, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017.
Smarzy ´nski, K.; Sarbak, P.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Róza ´nska, M.B.; Rybicka, I.; Polanowska, K.; Baranowska, H.M. Low-Field NMR ˙ Study of Shortcake Biscuits with Cricket Powder, and Their Nutritional and Physical Characteristics. Molecules 2021, 26, 5417.
Huis, A.V.; Itterbeeck, J.; Klunder, H.; Mertens, E.; Halloran, A.; Muir, G.; Vantomme, P. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security; FAO Forestry Paper 171; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013.
Ismail, B.P.; Senaratne-Lenagala, L.; Stube, A.; Brackenridge, A. Protein Demand: Review of Plant and Animal Proteins Used in Alternative Protein Product Development and Production. Anim. Front. 2020, 10, 53–63.
Baiano, A. Edible Insects: An Overview on Nutritional Characteristics, Safety, Farming, Production Technologies, Regulatory Framework, and Socio-Economic and Ethical Implications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 35–50.
Vantomme, P.; Mertens, E.; Van Huis, A.; Klunder, H. Assessing the Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security; Summary Report, Technical Consultation Meeting; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; pp. 23–25.
Zhong, A. Product Development Considerations for a Nutrient Rich Bar Using Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Protein; California State University: Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017.
Ribeiro, J.C.; Sousa-Pinto, B.; Fonseca, J.; Fonseca, S.C.; Cunha, L.M. Edible Insects and Food Safety: Allergy. J. Insects Food Feed. 2021, 7, 833–847.
Mafu, A.; Ketnawa, S.; Phongthai, S.; Schönlechner, R.; Rawdkuen, S. Whole Wheat Bread Enriched with Cricket Powder as an Alternative Protein. Foods 2022, 11, 2142.
Vogel, G. For More Protein, Filet of Cricket. Science 2010, 327, 811.
Zanolli, L. Insect Farming Is Taking Shape as Demand for Animal Feed Rises. MIT Techology Review, 20 August 2014.
Fiala, N. Meeting the Demand: An Estimation of Potential Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Meat Production. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 67, 412–419.
Dossey, A.; Tatum, J.; McGill, W. Modern Insect-Based Food Industry: Current Status, Insect Processing Technology, and Recommendations Moving Forward. In Insects as Sustainable Food Ingredients; Rojas, M., Ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2016; pp. 122–145.
Sponheimer, M.; de Ruiter, D.; Lee-Thorp, J.; Späth, A. Sr/Ca and Early Hominin Diets Revisited: New Data from Modern and Fossil Tooth Enamel. J. Hum. Evol. 2005, 48, 147–156.
Ramos-Elorduy, J. Anthropo-Entomophagy: Cultures, Evolution and Sustainability. Entomol. Res. 2009, 39, 271–288.
De Castro, R.J.S.; Ohara, A.; Aguilar, J.G.D.S.; Domingues, M.A.F. Nutritional, Functional and Biological Properties of Insect Proteins: Processes for Obtaining, Consumption and Future Challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 76, 82–89.
Gómez-Luciano, C.A.; de Aguiar, L.K.; Vriesekoop, F.; Urbano, B. Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase Three Alternatives to Meat Proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 78, 103732.
Oonincx, D.G.; van Itterbeeck, J.; Heetkamp, M.J.; van den Brand, H.; van Loon, J.J.; van Huis, A. An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14445.
Finke, M.D.; Rojo, S.; Roos, N.; van Huis, A.; Yen, A. The European Food Safety Authority Scientific Opinion on a Risk Profile Related to Production and Consumption of Insects as Food and Feed. J. Insects Food Feed. 2015, 1, 245–247.
Oonincx, D.G.; Van Broekhoven, S.; Van Huis, A.; van Loon, J.J. Feed Conversion, Survival and Development, and Composition of Four Insect Species on Diets Composed of Food By-Products. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144601.
Ciˇcková, H.; Newton, G.L.; Lacy, R.C.; Kozánek, M. The Use of Fly Larvae for Organic Waste Treatment. ˇ Waste Manag. 2015, 35, 68–80.
Kovács, K.; Sz˝ucs, R.S. Az Entomofágiával, Azaz a Rovarok Fogyasztásával Kapcsolatos Attit˝udök Vizsgálata. Jelenkori Társadalmi és Gazdasági Folyamatok 2023, 18, 119–138.
Rumpold, B.A.; Schlüter, O.K. Nutritional Composition and Safety Aspects of Edible Insects. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 802–823.
Tzompa-Sosa, D.A.; Dewettinck, K.; Provijn, P.; Brouwers, J.F.; De Meulenaer, B.; Oonincx, D.G. Lipidome of Cricket Species Used as Food. Food Chem. 2021, 349, 129077.
Carcea, M. Quality and Nutritional/Textural Properties of Durum Wheat Pasta Enriched with Cricket Powder. Foods 2020, 9, 1298.
Payne, C.L.R.; Scarborough, P.; Rayner, M.; Nonaka, K. Are Edible Insects More or Less Healthy than Commonly Consumed Meats? A Comparison Using Two Nutrient Profiling Models Developed to Combat Over- and Undernutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 285–291.
Kulma, M.; Kouˇrimská, L.; Plachý, V.; Božik, M.; Adámková, A.; Vrabec, V. Effect of Sex on the Nutritional Value of House Cricket, Acheta domestica L. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 267–272.
Megido, R.C.; Francis, F.; Haubruge, E.; Le Gall, P.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Miranda, C.D.; van Huis, A. A Worldwide Overview of the Status and Prospects of Edible Insect Production. Entomol. Gen. 2024, 44, 3–27.
von Hackewitz, L. The House Cricket Acheta domesticus, a Potential Source of Protein for Human Consumption; SLU, Department of Molecular Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2018.
Oonincx, D.G.A.B. Insects as Food and Feed: Nutrient Composition and Environmental Impact; Wageningen University: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2015.
Nakagaki, B.J.; DeFoliart, G.R. Comparison of Diets for Mass-Rearing Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) as a Novelty Food, and Comparison of Food Conversion Efficiency with Values Reported for Livestock. J. Econ. Entomol. 1991, 84, 891–896.
Halloran, A.; Roos, N.; Eilenberg, J.; Cerutti, A.; Bruun, S. Life Cycle Assessment of Edible Insects for Food Protein: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 57.
Oonincx, D.G.A.B.; de Boer, I.J.M. Environmental Impact of the Production of Mealworms as a Protein Source for Humans—A Life Cycle Assessment. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51145.
Tacon, A.G.J. Compound Aqua Feeds in a More Competitive Market: Alternative Protein Sources for a More Sustainable Future. In Avances en Nutrición Acuícola IX. Memorias del Noveno Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola; Cruz Suárez, L.E., Ed.; Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León: Monterrey, Mexico, 2008; pp. 24–26.
Sorjonen, J.M.; Valtonen, A.; Hirvisalo, E.; Karhapää, M.; Lehtovaara, V.J.; Lindgren, J.; Roininen, H. The Plant-Based By-Product Diets for the Mass-Rearing of Acheta domesticus and Gryllus bimaculatus. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218830.
Yen, A.L. Insects as Food and Feed in the Asia Pacific Region: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. J. Insects Food Feed. 2015, 1, 33–55.
Jansson, A.; Berggren, Å. Insects as Food—Something for the Future? Future Agriculture; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU): Uppsala, Sweden, 2015.
Siddiqui, S.A.; Zhao, T.; Fitriani, A.; Rahmadhia, S.N.; Alirezalu, K.; Fernando, I. Acheta domesticus (House Cricket) as Human Food—An Approval of the European Commission—A Systematic Review. Food Front. 2024, 5, 435–473.
Halloran, A.; Hanboonsong, Y.; Roos, N.; Bruun, S. Life Cycle Assessment of Cricket Farming in North-Eastern Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 156, 83–94.
Hanboonsong, Y.; Jamjanya, T.; Durst, P.B. Six-Legged Livestock: Edible Insect Farming, Collection and Marketing in Thailand; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013.
Collavo, A.L.B.; Glew, R.H.; Huang, Y.S.; Chuang, L.T.; Bosse, R.B.; Paoletti, M.G. House Cricket Small-Scale Farming. In Ecological Implications of Minilivestock: Potential of Insects, Rodents, Frogs and Snails; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 515–540.
Kok, R.; Shivhare, U.S.; Lomamliza, K. Mass and Component Balances for Insect Production. Can. Agric. Eng. 1990, 33, 185–192.
Larde, G. Investigations on Some Factors Affecting Larval Growth in a Coffee-Pulp Bed. Biol. Wastes 1989, 30, 11–19.
Malaisse, F. Human Consumption of Lepidoptera, Termites, Orthoptera, and Ants in Africa; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004
Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Changkija, S. Uses of Insects as Human Food in Papua New Guinea, Australia, and North-East India: Cross-Cultural Considerations and Cautious Conclusions. Ecol. Food Nutr. 1997, 36, 159–185.
Onore, G. A Brief Note on Edible Insects in Ecuador. Ecol. Food Nutr. 1997, 36, 277–285.
Ramos-Elorduy, J. Insects: A Sustainable Source of Food? Ecol. Food Nutr. 1997, 36, 247–276.
Ruddle, K. The Human Use of Insects: Examples from the Yukpa. Biotropica 1973, 5, 94–101.
Menzel, P.; D’Aluisio, F. Man Eating Bugs; Ten Speed Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1998; 192p.
Fenaroli, G. Le Sostanze Aromatiche; Hoepli Ed.: Milano, Italy, 1963; Volume 11, 1004p.
McFarlane, J.E.; Neilson, B.; Ghouri, A.S.K. Artificial Diets for the House Crickets. Can. J. Zool. 1959, 37, 913–916.
Patton, R.L. Olicidic Diets for Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1967, 60, 1238–1242.
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/882. Off. J. Eur. Union 2021, 64, 16–20.
Kłobukowski, F.; Smiechowska, M.; Skotnicka, M. Edible Insects from the Perspective of Sustainability—A Review of the Hazards ´ and Benefits. Foods 2025, 14, 1382.
Olivadese, M.; Dindo, M.L. Edible Insects: A Historical and Cultural Perspective on Entomophagy with a Focus on Western Societies. Insects 2023, 14, 690.
European Union Law. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/169. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, 10, L28.
European Union Law. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/188. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, 108, L30.
European Union Law. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/58. Off. J. Eur. Union 2023, 10, L5.
Van Thielen, L.; Vermuyten, S.; Storms, B.; Rumpold, B.A.; Van Campenhout, L. Consumer Acceptance of Foods Containing Edible Insects in Belgium Two Years after Their Introduction to the Market. J. Insects Food Feed. 2018, 5, 35–44.
Raheem, D.; Carrascosa, C.; Oluwole, O.B.; Nieuwland, M.; Saraiva, A.; Millan, R.; Raposo, A. Traditional Consumption of and Rearing Edible Insects in Africa, Asia and Europe. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 59, 2169–2188.
Bußler, S.; Rumpold, B.A.; Jander, E.; Rawel, H.M.; Schlüter, O.K. Recovery and Techno-Functionality of Flours and Proteins from Two Edible Insect Species: Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) and Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae. Heliyon 2016, 2, e00218.
Melgar-Lalanne, G.; Hernández-Álvarez, A.-J.; Salinas-Castro, A. Edible Insects Processing: Traditional and Innovative Technologies. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1166–1191.
Zuk-Gołaszewska, K.; Gałecki, R.; Obremski, K.; Smetana, S.; Figiel, S.; Gołaszewski, J. Edible Insect Farming in the Context of the EU Regulations and Marketing—An Overview. Insects 2022, 13, 446.
Pali-Schöll, I.; Meinlschmidt, P.; Larenas-Linnemann, D.; Purschke, B.; Hofstetter, G.; Rodríguez-Monroy, F.A.; Einhorn, L.; Mothes-Luksch, N.; Jensen-Jarolim, E.; Jäger, H. Edible Insects: Cross-Recognition of IgE from Crustacean- and House Dust Mite-Allergic Patients, and Reduction of Allergenicity by Food Processing. World Allergy Organ. J. 2019, 12, 100006.
De Gier, S.; Verhoeckx, K. Insect (Food) Allergy and Allergens. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 100, 82–106.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Safety of Frozen and Dried Formulations from Migratory Locust (Locusta migratoria) as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021, 19, 6667.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Safety of Partially Defatted House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) Powder as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2022, 20, 7258.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Safety of Frozen and Freeze-Dried Formulations of the Lesser Mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus Larva) as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2022, 20, 7325.
Niyonsaba, H.H.; Höhler, J.; Kooistra, J.; van der Fels-Klerx, H.J.; Meuwissen, M.P.M. Profitability of Insect Farms. J. Insects Food Feed. 2021, 7, 923–934.
European Commission. Approval Insect Novel Food; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2023.
Balogh, P. Evaluation of an Alternate Source of Protein: Challenges and Opportunities of Entomophagy. Hung. J. Food Nutr. Mark. 2016, 3, 3–12.
Looy, H.; Dunkel, F.V.; Wood, J.R. How Then Shall We Eat? Insect-Eating Attitudes and Sustainable Foodways. Agric. Hum. Values 2014, 31, 131–141.
Mancini, S.; Sogari, G.; Menozzi, D.; Nuvoloni, R.; Torracca, B.; Moruzzo, R.; Paci, G. Factors Predicting the Intention of Eating an Insect-Based Product. Foods 2019, 8, 270.
Szczepa ´nski, L.; Dupont, J.; Schade, F.; Hellberg, H.; Büscher, M.; Fiebelkorn, F. Effectiveness of a Teaching Unit on the Willingness to Consume Insect-Based Food—An Intervention Study with Adolescents from Germany. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 889805.
Szendr˝o, K.; Nagy, M.Z.; Tóth, K. Consumer Acceptance of Meat from Animals Reared. Animals 2020, 10, 1312.
Szendr˝o, K.; Tóth, K.; Nagy, M.Z. Opinions on Insect Consumption in Hungary. Foods 2020, 9, 1829.
Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Yang, Q.; Ur Rehman, K.; Li, W.; Zheng, L. Dynamic Changes of Nutrient Composition Throughout the Entire Life Cycle of Black Soldier Fly. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182601.
House, J. Consumer Acceptance of Insect-Based Foods in the Netherlands: Academic and Commercial Implications. Appetite 2016, 107, 47–58.
Abdullahi, N.; Igwe, E.C.; Dandago, M.A.; Yunusa, A.K. Consumption of Edible Insects: The Challenges and the Prospects. Food ScienTech J. 2021, 3, 1–24.
Hartmann, C.; Shi, J.; Giusto, A.; Siegrist, M. The Psychology of Eating Insects: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between Germany and China. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 44, 148–156.
Ruby, M.; Rozin, P.; Chan, C. Determinants of Willingness to Eat Insects in the USA and India. J. Insects Food Feed. 2015, 1, 215–225.
Lensvelt, E.J.; Steenbekkers, L.P. Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Entomophagy: A Survey and Experiment in Australia and the Netherlands. Ecol. Food Nutr. 2014, 53, 543–561.
Copelotti, E.; Menozzi, D.; Sogari, G.; Mora, C. Are Insect-Based Foods Healthy? An Evaluation of the Products Sold in European E-Commerce. Foods 2025, 14, 1450.
Gravel, A.; Doyen, A. The Use of Edible Insect Proteins in Food: Challenges and Issues Related to Their Functional Properties. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 59, 102272.
Udomsil, N.; Imsoonthornruksa, S.; Gosalawit, C.; Ketudat-Cairns, M. Nutritional Values and Functional Properties of House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) and Field Cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus). Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2019, 25, 597–605.
Feng, L.; Yan, L.; Zhang, J. The Role of Disease Management in Cricket Farming: A Review. J. Appl. Insect Sci. 2018, 57, 23–34.
Micha, R.; Coates, J.; Leclercq, C.; Charrondiere, U.R.; Mozaffarian, D. Global Dietary Surveillance: Data Gaps and Challenges. Food Nutr. Bull. 2018, 39, 175–205.
Post, M.J. Cultured Meat from Stem Cells: Challenges and Prospects. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 297–301.
Gahukar, R.T. Factors Affecting Content and Bioefficacy of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) Phytochemicals Used in Agricultural Pest Control: A Review. Crop Prot. 2014, 62, 93–99.
Gere, A.; Zemel, R.; Radványi, D.; Moskowitz, H. Insect-Based Foods: A Nutritional Point of View. Nutr. Food Sci. Int. J. 2017, 4, 555638.
Finke, M.D. Estimate of Chitin in Raw Whole Insects. Zoo Biol. 2007, 26, 105–115.
Belluco, S.; Losasso, C.; Maggioletti, M.; Alonzi, C.C.; Paoletti, M.G.; Ricci, A. Edible Insects in the Food Industry: Opportunities and Challenges. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 296–313.
Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan: Properties and Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 603–632.
Dimopoulos, G.; Tsantes, M.; Taoukis, P. Effect of High Pressure Homogenization on the Production of Yeast Extract via Autolysis and Beta-Glucan Recovery. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 62, 102340.
Gorbunova, N.A.; Zakharov, A.N. Edible Insects as a Source of Alternative Protein. A Review. Theory Pract. Meat Process. 2021, 6, 23–32.
Derrien, C.; Boccuni, A. Current Status of the Insect Producing Industry in Europe. In Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems; Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 471–479.
Mandal, F.B.; Dutta, M. The Potential of Entomophagy against Malnutrition and Ensuring Food Sustainability. Afr. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 4, 15–22.
Magara, H.J.O.; Niassy, S.; Ayieko, M.A.; Mukundamago, M.; Egonyu, J.P.; Tanga, C.M.; Kimathi, E.K.; Ongere, J.O.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Hugel, S.; et al. Edible Crickets (Orthoptera) Around the World: Distribution, Nutritional Value, and Other Benefits—A Review1. Front. Nutr. 2021, 7, 537915.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Safety of Dried Yellow Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor Larva) as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021, 19, 6343.
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/882 of 1 June 2021 Authorising the Placing on the Market of Dried Tenebrio molitor Larva as a Novel Food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Off. J. Eur. Union 2021, L194, 16–20.
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1975 of 12 November 2021 Authorising the Placing on the Market of Frozen, Dried and Powder Forms of Locusta migratoria as a Novel Food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Off. J. Eur. Union 2021, L402, 10–16. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2021/1975/oj (accessed on 15 July 2025).
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/169 of 8 February 2022 Authorising the Placing on the Market of Frozen, Dried and Powder Forms of Tenebrio molitor (Yellow Mealworm) as a Novel Food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, L28, 10–16. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2022/169/oj (accessed on 15 July 2025).
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/188 of 10 February 2022 Authorising the Placing on the Market of Frozen, Dried and Powder Forms of Acheta domesticus as a Novel Food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Amending Comm2ission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, L30, 108–113. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2022/188/oj (accessed on 15 July 2025).
Finke, M.D. Complete Nutrient Content of Four Species of Commercially Available Feeder Insects. Zoo. Biol. 2013, 32, 27–36.
Tang, C.; Yang, D.; Liao, H.; Sun, H.; Liu, C. Edible Insects as a Food Source: A Review. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2019, 1, 1–13.
Hwang, S.S.; Baek, M.H.; Lee, J.H. Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Preferences for Cricket-Based Food Products. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 61, 74–85.
Goff, M.; Peter, L. The Role of Cricket Flour in Food Product Development. Food Sci. Rev. 2018, 26, 105–114.
Ayensu, J.; Annan, R.A.; Edusei, A.; Lutterodt, H. Beyond Nutrients, Health Effects of Entomophagy: A Systematic Review. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 49, 2–17.
Florenca, S.G.; Guine, R.P.; Goncalves, F.J.; Barroca, M.J.; Ferreira, M.; Costa, C.A.; Cunha, L.M. The Motivations for Consumption of Edible Insects: A Systematic Review. Foods 2022, 11, 3643.
Tobolkova, B. Edible Insects-the Future of a Healthy Diet? Nov. Tech. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 4, 325–328.
DeFoliart, G.R. Insects as Food: Why the Western Attitude Is Important. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1999, 44, 21–50.
Kouˇrimská, I.; Adámková, A. Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Edible Insects. NFS J. 2016, 4, 22–26.
Kim, M.-S.; Ye, S.-J.; Roh, J.-H.; Choi, H.-W.; Baik, M.-Y. Comprehensive Analysis of Storage Stability of Hong-Jam Under Various Conditions: Correlation Between Lipid Oxidation Factors and Alternative Quality Parameters. Foods 2025, 14, 1593.
Han, R.; Shin, J.T.; Kim, J.; Choi, Y.S.; Kim, Y.W. An Overview of the South Korean Edible Insect Food Industry: Challenges and Future Pricing/Promotion Strategies. Entomol. Res. 2017, 47, 141–151.
Biro, B.; Fodor, R.; Szedljak, I.; Pasztor-Huszar, K.; Gere, A. Buckwheat-Pasta Enriched with Silkworm Powder: Technological Analysis and Sensory Evaluation. LWT 2019, 116, 108542.
Biro, B.; Sipos, M.A.; Kovacs, A.; Badak-Kerti, K.; Pasztor-Huszar, K.; Gere, A. Cricket-Enriched Oat Biscuit: Technological Analysis and Sensory Evaluation. Foods 2020, 9, 1561.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Anja Petrova, Prof. Kenji Tanaka, Dr. Samuel O. Adebayo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.