TikTok vs Instagram: Youth Platform Preferences and PR Strategy Implications
Polina Verdieva , Independent Researcher, USAAbstract
The study is aimed at identifying and analyzing key determinants that influence the propensity of youth to prefer one social network over another. The methodological basis of the work consisted of a comprehensive systems analysis and synthesis of scholarly publications combined with the processing of statistical datasets from recognized industry sources. As a result, a close relationship was established between user choices and three interrelated factors: the specifics of algorithmic content ranking mechanisms, the dominant formats of materials and the sociocultural constitution features of each network’s community. Thus, TikTok emerges as an ecosystem stimulating authentic self-expression, interactive engagement and the consumption of predominantly entertainment media products, whereas Instagram retains the status of a gallery of visually refined idealized content serving as a means of social validation and personal brand maintenance. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the proposal of an adaptive model of PR strategies that accounts for the unique psychographic and behavioral characteristics of each platform’s users. The findings demonstrate the impossibility of effectively applying universal communication solutions and justify the need to design targeted tactics customized to the specifics of TikTok’s and Instagram’s functioning. The presented materials will be useful to both media communications researchers and PR and marketing practitioners seeking to optimize interactions with youth audiences.
Keywords
TikTok, Instagram, Generation Z, user preferences, PR strategies
References
Poushter, J., Bishop, C., & Chwe, H. (2023). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2023. [Electronic resource] Access mode: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/12/11/teens-social-media-and-technology-2023/ (accessed: 10.06.2025).
Number of Instagram users worldwide from 2019 to 2028. [Electronic resource] Access mode: https://www.statista.com/statistics/253577/number-of-monthly-active-instagram-users/ (date of access: 06/20/2025).
Palm oil industry worldwide - statistics & facts. [Electronic resource] Access mode: https://www.statista.com/topics/6079/tiktok/ (date of access: 06/22/2025).
Mcphie J., Clarke D. A. G. Distributed assemblages of cognition and health (or) how TikTok ate my mind //Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Mental Health and Wellbeing. – Routledge, 2024. – pp. 283-290.
Carkner B. The rhythm of the Algorithm: behavioural influences and TikTok users //Emerging Library & Information Perspectives. – 2024. – Vol. 6 (1). – pp. 7-23. https://doi.org/10.5206/elip.v6i1.16753.
Maddox J. Micro-celebrities of information: mapping calibrated expertise and knowledge influencers among social media veterinarians //Information, Communication & Society. – 2023. – Vol. 26 (14). – pp. 2726-2752.
Boursier V., Gioia F. Which are the effects of body-objectification and Instagram-related practices on male body esteem? A cross-sectional study //Clinical neuropsychiatry. – 2022. – Vol. 19 (1). – pp. 8 -19.
Chen N., Yang Y. The role of influencers in live streaming e-commerce: influencer trust, attachment, and consumer purchase intention //Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. – 2023. – Vol. 18 (3). – pp. 1601-1618.https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18030081.
Shen R. P. et al. Your posts betray you: Detecting influencer-generated sponsored posts by finding the right clues //Information & Management. – 2022. – Vol. 59 (8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103719.
Velasco-Molpeceres A. et al. Slow fashion as a communication strategy of fashion brands on Instagram //Sustainability. – 2022. – Vol. 15 (1). – pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010423.
Digital 2025: the state of social media in 2025. [Electronic resource] Access mode: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-sub-section-state-of-social (date of access: 06/24/2025).
Vrontis D. et al. Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda //International Journal of Consumer Studies. – 2021. – Vol. 45 (4). – pp. 617-644.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Polina Verdieva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.