Articles | Open Access |

BALANCING ACT: THE ROLE OF ETHICS IN MODERATING CONFLICT RESOLUTION

Baris Kartal , Turkish Military Academy Bakanliklar, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

This paper explores the critical role of ethics in moderating conflict resolution processes within organizations. Conflicts are inevitable in any workplace, and their resolution often hinges on the ethical frameworks employed by individuals and teams. By analyzing various case studies, the research highlights how ethical principles, such as fairness, transparency, and accountability, influence negotiation strategies and outcomes. The findings suggest that a strong ethical foundation can lead to more effective conflict resolution, fostering a culture of trust and collaboration. This study also emphasizes the importance of training and institutional policies that promote ethical behavior, ultimately contributing to improved organizational health and employee satisfaction.

 

Keywords

Ethics, Conflict Resolution, Organizational Behavior

References

Ahmed, P.K., 1998. Culture and climate for innovation. Eur. J. Innovation Manage., 1: 30-43.

Aiken, L.S., S.G. West and R.R. Reno, 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, Inc., California.

Baker, T.L., T.G. Hunt and M.C. Andrews, 2006. Promoting ethical behavior and organizational citizenship behaviors: The influence of corporate ethical values. J. Bus. Res., 59: 849-857.

Bell, B.S. and W.J. Kozlowski, 2002. Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance and knowledge. J. Applied Psychol., 87: 497-505.

Brown, G. and C.C. Harris, 1992. The US forest service: Toward the new resource management paradigm. Soc. Natural Res., 5: 231-245.

Buckler, B., 1996. A learning process model to achieve continuous improvement and innovation. Learn. Organiz., 3: 31-39.

Caldwell, D.F. and C.A. O'Reilly, 2003. The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations. Small Group Res., 34: 497-517.

Carmeli, A., R. Meitar and J. Weisberg, 2006. Self-leadership skills and abilities. Int. J. Man Power, 27: 75-90.

Ciavolino, E., 2011. An information theoretic job satisfaction analysis. J. Applied Sci., 11: 686-692.

Drucker, P.F., 1998. Managing for Results. Inkılap Publishing, Istanbul.

Dweck, C.S., Y. Hong and C. Chiu, 1993. Implicit theories: Individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Person. Social Psychol. Bull., 19: 644-656.

Elliot, A.J. and H.A. McGregor, 2001. A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 80: 501-519.

Ferrell, O.C. and S.J. Skinner, 1988. Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. J. Marketing Res., 25: 103-109.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Baris Kartal. (2024). BALANCING ACT: THE ROLE OF ETHICS IN MODERATING CONFLICT RESOLUTION. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(11), 1–6. Retrieved from https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas/article/view/5587