This study delves into the intricate mechanical behavior of subcellular organelles by employing a sophisticated 3D finite element model that embraces the principles of tensegrity structures. Tensegrity, a structural concept characterized by a balance of tension and compression elements, has been increasingly recognized as a crucial framework for understanding the dynamic nature of cellular components. Through our computational approach, we explore the biomechanical responses of subcellular organelles, shedding light on their structural integrity, deformation patterns, and overall mechanical functionality. The insights gained from this study contribute to the growing understanding of cellular biomechanics, offering potential applications in fields such as cell biology, bioengineering, and medicine.

Tensegrity, subcellular organelles, biomechanics

Ross, M.H.; Pawlina, W. Histology; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2006.

McGarry, J.; Prendergast, P. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. Eur. Cells Mater. 2004, 7, 27–33.

Prendergast, P.J. Computational modelling of cell and tissue mechanoresponsiveness. Gravit. Space Res. 2007, 20, 43–50.

De Santis, G.; Lennon, A.; Boschetti, F.; Verhegghe, B.; Verdonck, P.; Prendergast, P. How can cells sense the elasticity of a substrate?: An analysis using a cell tensegrity model. Eur. Cells Mater. 2011, 22, 202–213.

Chen, T.-J.; Wu, C.-C.; Tang, M.-J.; Huang, J.-S.; Su, F.-C. Complexity of the tensegrity structure for dynamic energy and force distribution of cytoskeleton during cell spreading. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14392.

Kardas, D.; Nackenhorst, U.; Balzani, D. Computational model for the cell-mechanical response of the osteocyte cytoskeleton based on self-stabilizing tensegrity structures. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2013, 12, 167–183.

Guerrero, C.R.; Garcia, P.D.; Garcia, R. Subsurface imaging of cell organelles by force microscopy. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 9629–9637.

Garcia, R. Nanomechanical mapping of soft materials with the atomic force microscope: Methods, theory and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5850–5884.

Thoumine, O.; Cardoso, O.; Meister, J.-J. Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: A micromanipulation study. Eur. Biophys. J. 1999, 28, 222–234.

Unnikrishnan, G.; Unnikrishnan, V.; Reddy, J. Constitutive material modeling of cell: A micromechanics approach. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129, 315–323.

Vaziri, A.; Mofrad, M.R.K. Mechanics and deformation of the nucleus in micropipette aspiration experiment. J. Biomech. 2007, 40, 2053–2062.

Wang, N.; Tolic-Nørrelykke, I.M.; Chen, J.; Mijailovich, S.M.; Butler, J.P.; Fredberg, J.J.; Stamenovic, D. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2002, 282, C606–C616.

Stamenović, D.; Coughlin, M.F. The role of prestress and architecture of the cytoskeleton and deformability of cytoskeletal filaments in mechanics of adherent cells: A quantitative analysis. J. Theor. Biol. 1999, 201, 63–74.

Ingber, D.E. Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1157–1173.

Chen, C.S.; Mrksich, M.; Huang, S.; Whitesides, G.M.; Ingber, D.E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997, 276, 1425–1428.

Kenner, H. Geodesic Math and How to Use It; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003.

Ingber, D.E. Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1397–1408.