Applied Sciences | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume03Issue11-06

Age Calculation From Human Face For Wrongdoing Examination

Dipyaman Pal , Department Of Computer Science And Engineering, Rabindra Bharati University, India

Abstract

Unique Humanities depicts the logical investigation of the beginning, the conduct, and the physical, social, and social improvement of people. Scientific anthropologists are prepared actual anthropologists who apply their insight into science, science, and culture to the legitimate interaction. They recognize human remaining parts, alongside pathologists, manslaughter investigators and different subject matter experts. Age assurance of obscure human bodies is significant in the setting of a wrongdoing examination or a mass calamity on the grounds that the age at death, birth date, and year of death too as sex can direct specialists to the right character among an enormous number of conceivable matches. Conventional morphological strategies utilized by anthropologists to decide age are regularly uncertain.

Keywords

Component Extraction, Sex Characterization

References

Bloch, H. P., Gietner, F. K., Jacobson, D., (compiler) (1985). Practical Machinery Management for Process Plants: Major Process Equipment Maintenance and Repair, Vol. 4, Gulf, 448-492.

Pal, M. (2008). Multiclass approaches for support vector machine based land cover classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:0802.2411.

Uyles, B. (2001). “Internet Security Protocols: Protecting IP traffic,” Pearson Education Asia, 1st Edition.

Jack, T. K. (2015). Experience with Industrial Gas Turbine Overhaul: Field Implementation, Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2(2): (Accepted for Publication).

Žlebnik, L. (1974). Opća povijest pedagogije, PKZ: Zagreb.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Dipyaman Pal. (2021). Age Calculation From Human Face For Wrongdoing Examination. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(11), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume03Issue11-06