Articles
| Open Access | Post-Fire Welfare of Domestic Ruminants: A Scoping Review of Guidelines and Assessment Protocols
Dr. Jane R. Thompson , Department of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Australia Prof. Michael S. Davis , Faculty of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, USAAbstract
Objective: The primary goal of this scoping review is to establish evidence-based guidelines for the post-fire assessment of domestic ruminants, specifically focusing on evaluating their health and welfare following exposure to fire-related trauma.
Methods: We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature on post-fire assessments of domestic ruminants. Relevant studies were identified from major databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using specific search terms related to fire injury, ruminants, and post-trauma assessment. The data were categorized and analyzed to identify key factors influencing the health and management of domestic ruminants after fire exposure.
Results: A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in their focus, ranging from the effects of direct heat exposure to the psychological impact of fire exposure on livestock. The findings indicate that post-fire assessments should involve comprehensive physical evaluations, including assessments of burn wounds, respiratory health, and behavioral changes. Environmental factors, including access to food and water post-fire, were also identified as critical elements in post-fire care.
Conclusions: Evidence-based guidelines for the post-fire assessment of domestic ruminants can be established based on the identified health parameters. These guidelines should emphasize the importance of a thorough physical and behavioral evaluation, immediate care protocols, and monitoring of environmental conditions to ensure the well-being of ruminants following fire exposure.
Keywords
Post-fire, Ruminants, Domestic animals, Animal welfare
References
Rethorst DN, Spare RK, Kellenberger JL. Wildfire Response in Range Cattle. Vet Clin Food Animals. 2018;34:281–8.
Forsyth, G., LeMaitre, LeRoux, A.; Ludick, C. Green Book. The impact of climate change on wildfires in South Africa. Pretoria: CSIR. 2019.
United Nations Environment Programme. Spreading like Wildfire - The Rising Threat of Extraordinary Landscape Fires. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. Nairobi. 2022.
https://sdgs.un.org/goals: accessed 15 April 2024.
Khatri P, Kumar P, Shakya KS, et al. Understanding the intertwined nature of rising multiple risks in modern agriculture and food systems. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03638-7.
Knight JE. After Wildfire - Information for landowners coping with the aftermath of wildfire. In: Knight JE, editor. Extension Agriculture and Natural Resources Program. Bozeman: Montana State University; 2002.
Squance H, MacDonald C, Stewart C, et al. Strategies for Implementing a One Welfare Framework into Emergency Management. Animals. 2021;11:3141.
OIE. Guidelines on Disaster Management and risk reduction in relation to animal health and welfare and veterinary public health (Guidelines for national veterinary services). World Organisation for Animal Health. 2016. https://www.woah.org.
Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ. Extending the Five Domains model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Anim Welf. 2015;24(3):241–53.
Hemsworth PH, Mellor DJ, Cronin GM, Tilbrook AJ. Scientific assessment of animal welfare. N Z Vet J. 2015;63:24–30.
Cardoso CS, von Keyserlingk MA, Hotzel MJ. Trading off animal welfare and production goals: Brazilian dairy farmers’ perspectives on calf dehorning. Livest Sci. 2016;187:102–8.
Narayan EM, Barreto M, Hantzopoulou GC, Tilbrook A. A retrospective literature evaluation of the integration of stress physiology indices, animal welfare and climate change assessment of livestock. Animals. 2021;11(5):1287.
Korte SM, Olivier B, Koolhaas JM. A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis. Physiology and Behaviour. 2007;92:422–8.
Surowiecka-Pastewka A, Witkowski W, Kawecki M. A New Triage Method for Burn Disasters: Fast Triage in Burns (FTB). Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:1894–901.
Rogers J, Scholz T, Gillen A. Dealing with livestock affected by the 2014 bushfires in South Australia: decision-making and recovery. AJEM. 2015;30(2):13–7.
Cowled BD, Bannister-Tyrrell M, Doyle M, et al. The Australian 2019/2020 Black Summer Bushfires: Analysis of the Pathology, Treatment Strategies and Decision Making About Burnt Livestock. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022;9: 790556.
Wingfield W.E. Veterinary Disaster Triage: Making the Tough Decisions. 2009.
Wohlsein P, Peters M, Schulze C, Baumgartner W. Thermal Injuries in Veterinary Forensic Pathology. Vet Pathol. 2016;53(5):1001–17.
Willson RL. Assessment of bush fire damage to stock. Aust Vet J. 1966;42:101–3.
Madigan J, Wilson D, Stull C. Wildfires. Smoke and Livestock: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis; 2008.
Moore RA, Popowicz P, Burns B. Rule of Nines. StatPearls Publishing LLC. National Library of Medicine, Bookshelf ID: NBK13287, last updated 02/2024.
Thom D. Appraising current methods for preclinical calculation of burn size - a pre-hospital perspective. Burns. 2017;43(1):127–36.
Pierson RE, Larson KA, Turbes C, Palen JS. Treatment of second-degree thermal burns in cattle. VM Therapy. 1969;1:218–29.
Noorbakhsh SI, Bonar EM, Polinski R, Amin MdS. Educational Case: Burn Injury - Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment. Acad Path. 2021;8:2374.
Rice, P.L. & Orgill, D.P Assessment and classification of burn injury. UptoDate, 2021. 1–11.
Hao D, Nourbakhsh M. Recent Advances in Experimental Burn Models. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(6):526.
Nielson CB, Deuthman NC, Howard JM, et al. Burns: Pathophysiology of Systemic Complications and Current Management. J Burn Care Res. 2016;38(1):e469–81.
Jeschke MG, van Baar ME, Choudhry MA, et al. Burn injury. Nature Reviews / Disease Primers. 2020;6(11):1–25.
Cox RA, Burke AS, Soejima K, et al. Airway Obstruction in Sheep with Burn and Smoke Inhalation Injuries. American Journal Respiratory Cell Molecular Biology. 2003;29:295–302.
O’Hara KC, Ranches J, Roche LM, et al. Impacts from Wildfires on Livestock Health and Production: Producer Perspectives. Animals. 2021;11:3230.
Vaughan, J. Assessing and caring for alpacas after bushfires, Victoria. 2007.
Alvarado R, Chung K, Cancio L, Wolf SE. Burn resuscitation. Burns. 2009;35(1):4–14.
Traber MG, Shimoda K, Murakami K, et al. Burn and smoke inhalation injury in sheep depletes vitamin E: Kinetic studies using deuterated tocopherols. Free Radical Biol Med. 2007;42(9):1421–9.
Soejima K, Schmalstieg FC, Sakurai H, et al. Pathophysiological analysis of combined burn and smoke inhalation injuries in sheep. ASAIO J. 2001;47(4):365–71.
Dubick MA, Williams C, Elgjo GI, Kramer GC. High-dose Vitamin C Infusion Reduces Fluid Requirements in the Resuscitation of Burn-injured Sheep. Shock. 2005;24(2):139–4
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Jane R. Thompson, Prof. Michael S. Davis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.