Political Science Law | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume08Issue03-14

Digital Technologies in Ensuring Justice Scientific and Practical Significance of Artificial Intelligence

Gulnoza Yusupdzhanova Ilxomovna , Lecturer of Tashkent state university of law, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article comprehensively analyzes the scientific and practical significance of digital technologies and artificial intelligence in ensuring justice. The advantages and risks of applying artificial intelligence in the judicial sphere are considered using the example of world experience - the USA, the European Union, France, Singapore, and Estonia, which is the most successful example of digital statehood in the world. Based on the tasks set forth in the Address of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Oliy Majlis in December 2025, three scientifically based strategic proposals for the digitalization of judicial justice have been developed.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, justice, digital transformation

References

Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Address to the Oliy Majlis. - Tashkent, December 2025.

Danziger S., Levav J., Avnaim-Pesso L. External factors in judicial decisions // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. - 2011. - Vol. 108, No. 17. - P. 6889-6892. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018033108.

Dressel J., Farid H. The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism // Science Advances. - 2018. - Vol. 4, No. 1. - P. 5580. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580.

Angwin J., Larson J., Mattu S., Kirchner L. Machine Bias // ProPublica. - 2016. - May 23. URL: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council - Artificial Intelligence Act. - Тошкент, 2021.

Susskind R. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. - 368 p.

7. e-Estonia. e-Justice Factsheet. URL: https://e-estonia.com/wp-content/uploads/factsheet_e-justice.pdf (accessed: 2025).

8. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Cross-Regional Court Performance Assessment - Country Report Estonia. - Тошкент, 2021.

9. Eesti Justiitsministeerium (Ministry of Justice of Estonia). Justice Scoreboard 2019 - Estonia. - Тошкент, 2020. URL: https://www.justdigi.ee/en/news/judicial-proceedings-estonia-are-still-most-efficient-and-quickest-europe

10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). AI and the Future of Justice: Opportunities and Challenges. - Тошкент, 2022.

11. World Bank Group. Doing Business 2023: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. - Тошкент, 2020.

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Gulnoza Yusupdzhanova Ilxomovna. (2026). Digital Technologies in Ensuring Justice Scientific and Practical Significance of Artificial Intelligence. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 8(03), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume08Issue03-14