Digital Technologies in Ensuring Justice Scientific and Practical Significance of Artificial Intelligence
Gulnoza Yusupdzhanova Ilxomovna , Lecturer of Tashkent state university of law, UzbekistanAbstract
This article comprehensively analyzes the scientific and practical significance of digital technologies and artificial intelligence in ensuring justice. The advantages and risks of applying artificial intelligence in the judicial sphere are considered using the example of world experience - the USA, the European Union, France, Singapore, and Estonia, which is the most successful example of digital statehood in the world. Based on the tasks set forth in the Address of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan to the Oliy Majlis in December 2025, three scientifically based strategic proposals for the digitalization of judicial justice have been developed.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, justice, digital transformation
References
Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Address to the Oliy Majlis. - Tashkent, December 2025.
Danziger S., Levav J., Avnaim-Pesso L. External factors in judicial decisions // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. - 2011. - Vol. 108, No. 17. - P. 6889-6892. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018033108.
Dressel J., Farid H. The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism // Science Advances. - 2018. - Vol. 4, No. 1. - P. 5580. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580.
Angwin J., Larson J., Mattu S., Kirchner L. Machine Bias // ProPublica. - 2016. - May 23. URL: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council - Artificial Intelligence Act. - Тошкент, 2021.
Susskind R. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. - 368 p.
7. e-Estonia. e-Justice Factsheet. URL: https://e-estonia.com/wp-content/uploads/factsheet_e-justice.pdf (accessed: 2025).
8. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Cross-Regional Court Performance Assessment - Country Report Estonia. - Тошкент, 2021.
9. Eesti Justiitsministeerium (Ministry of Justice of Estonia). Justice Scoreboard 2019 - Estonia. - Тошкент, 2020. URL: https://www.justdigi.ee/en/news/judicial-proceedings-estonia-are-still-most-efficient-and-quickest-europe
10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). AI and the Future of Justice: Opportunities and Challenges. - Тошкент, 2022.
11. World Bank Group. Doing Business 2023: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. - Тошкент, 2020.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gulnoza Yusupdzhanova Ilxomovna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.


Political Science Law
| Open Access |
DOI: