★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Political Science Law OPEN ACCESS

Reforming Global Tax Rules And Standards For The Digital Economy

Mokhinur Bahramovna Bakhramova
Associate Professor of the Department of English Law and European Union Law at TSUL, Doctor of Juridical Science, Uzbekistan
tajpslc 2026
VOL. 8 / NO. 01 JANUARY
VOLUME 8
ISSUE 01
YEAR 2026
PAGES 52-57

Abstract

This paper investigates options for reforming global tax rules and standards to address challenges from the digital economy. Analysis of European Union, United States, China and India taxation practices reveals a spectrum of policy measures balancing revenue rights, investment competitiveness, and compliance costs. Findings emphasize the need to update concepts like nexus and profit allocation, while retaining coherence, certainty and fairness. Consensus-based multilateral solutions can prevent damaging unilateral taxes. For developing countries, gradual reforms aligned with international standards are recommended to sustain digital economy growth.

Keywords

Digital economy international taxation tax reform

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. ADB (Asian Development Bank). (2019). Digital technology in tax administration in Central Asia. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/535236/digital-technology-tax-administration-central-asia.pdf
  2. Aslam, A., & Shah, A. (2020). Taxation and the peer-to-peer economy. IMF Fiscal Affairs Special Series on COVID-19. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLs/covid19-special-notes
  3. Basu, D. (2019). An analysis of the tax framework for digitalized economy: Key issues and viable policy options. Transnational Corporations Review, 12(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2019.1688320
  4. Brauner, Y., & Pistone, P. (2021). BRICS and the digitalization of the economy: Developing countries’ perspectives on taxing the digital economy. BRICS Law Journal, 8(1), 44-57. https://bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/1170
  5. Christians, A., & Magalhães, T. (2020). Tax sovereignty in the context of global financial interdependence. SSRN Working Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3710687
  6. Cui, W. (2019). Taxation of the digital economy: Pillar one and pillar two. British Tax Review, (6), 622-651.
  7. Das, K. C. (2020). Global profit split: An alternative to formulary apportionment for taxing MNEs in the digitalized economy. World Tax Journal, 12(3), 477-501.
  8. EY. (2016). China's VAT reform: Indirect tax guide. https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-chinas-vat-reform-indirect-tax-guide-en/$FILE/EY-chinas-vat-reform-indirect-tax-guide-en.pdf
  9. Hearson, M. (2018). When do developing countries negotiate away their corporate tax base? Journal of International Development, 30(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3351
  10. IMF (2019a). Corporate taxation in the global economy. Policy Paper No. 19/007. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2019/03/08/Corporate-Taxation-in-the-Global-Economy-46650
  11. IMF (2019b). Taxation of cryptocurrencies: IMF Fiscal Monitor. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2019/03/18/fiscal-monitor-april-2019.
  12. IMF. (2020). Digitalization and tax systems in Asia. Departmental Paper No. 20/05. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Departmental-Papers-Policy-Papers/Issues/2020/06/15/Digitalization-and-Tax-Systems-in-Asia-49517
  13. IRS (2022). Advance pricing agreements. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/advance-pricing-agreements
  14. KPMG (2020). Evolving tax regime for e-commerce in India. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/in/pdf/2020/04/evolving-tax-regime-for-e-commerce-in-india.pdf
  15. Liu, L. (2022). When global tax governance meets authoritarian capitalism in the digital economy: A case study of China. Regulation & Governance, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12428
  16. OECD (2020a). Tax challenges arising from digitalization – report on pillar one blueprint. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-report-on-pillar-one-blueprint-beba0634-en.htm
  17. OECD (2020b). Tax challenges arising from digitalization – report on pillar two blueprint. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-report-on-pillar-two-blueprint-abb4c3d1-en.htm
  18. OECD (2020c). Corporate tax statistics database. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/corporate-tax-statistics-database.htm
  19. OECD (2020d). Taxing virtual currencies: An overview of tax treatments and emerging tax policy issues. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/taxing-virtual-currencies-an-overview-of-tax-treatments-and-emerging-tax-policy-issues.pdf
  20. OECD (2022). Statement on a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/statement-on-a-two-pillar-solution-to-address-the-tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-october-2021.pdf
  21. Picciotto, S. (2020). Towards unitary taxation: Combined reporting and formulary apportionment. Tax Justice Network. https://taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Unitary-taxation-report-Tax-Justice-Network-July-2020.pdf
  22. USAID (2020). Digitalizing tax through blockchain, artificial intelligence and chatbots in Uzbekistan. https://www.usaid.gov/digital-development/digitalizing-tax-through-blockchain-artificial-intelligence-and-chatbots-uzbekistan
  23. Varol, C., Mendoza, R. U., Górski, J., Landes, J., & Engelke, L. (2022). The accounting and taxation of crypto-assets. Economic Analysis and Policy, 72, 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.12.012
  24. Wagini, C. (2021). Taxing big tech: The EU’s proposed digital services tax. European View, 20(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858211001035
  25. Wells, B. & Lowell, C. (2019). Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS): OECD tax proposals. Congressional Research Service Report. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R44013.pdf