Articles
| Open Access |
DOI: Predictive Justice and Artificial Intelligence: Comparative Legal Analysis of Judicial Practice
Hurshid Sadikov , Independent applicant of the Supreme School of Judges, UzbekistanAbstract
The article is dedicated to research on the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the justice sector, with a focus on predictive coding and "predicted justice." A comparative legal analysis of the practice of the USA, China, European Union countries, and France was conducted. Special attention is paid to the role of AI at the proof stage: analysis of evidence, automation of legal procedures, and reduction of corruption risks. Examples of court cases illustrate both the possibilities and risks of applying AI in court proceedings. Institutional and ethical limitations, including issues of trust, algorithm reliability, and equality of parties, are also considered. It is noted that despite technological progress, full confidence in AI in the judicial system has not yet been formed. It was concluded that it is necessary to develop general regulations and gradually implement AI, taking into account the principles of procedural fairness.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, predictive justice, evidence
References
Andy Clark, ‘Beyond the “Bayesian Blur”: Predictive Processing and the Nature of Subjective Experience’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25 (2018), 71-87.
Moore v. Publicis Groupe, 287 F.R.D. 182 (2012) Available at: https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914efbaadd7b0493496dd52
Da Silva Moore, et al. v. Publicis Groupe, No. 11-Civ.-1279 (ALC) (AJP), 2012 WL 607412 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2012) Available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2011cv01279/375665/96/
EORHB, Inc. v. HOA Holdings, LLC, No. 7409-VCL, 2013 WL 1960621 (Del. Ch. May 6, 2013) Available at: https://www.wilsonelser.com/writable/files/Legal_Analysis/389292-v1-eorhb-v-hoa-holdings-no-7409- vcl-2013-esi-update.pdf
В Китае внедрили судебный ИИ. Или нет? Available at: https://habr.com/ru/post/677920/
Judges: Beijing Internet Court. Available at: https://english.bjinternetcourt.gov.cn/judges_3.html
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and theirenvironment. Available at: https://surl.li/ombpwg
Цифровизация судебного процесса: опыт Евросоюза. Available at: https://habr.com/ru/company/ digitalrightscenter/blog/696846/
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hurshid Sadikov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.