★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Political Science Law OPEN ACCESS

Evaluating the effects of reward systems on prison behavior: a systematic review

Johnathan S. Mitchell
Department of Criminal Justice, University of Riverside, USA
Amira K. Hassan
Faculty of Law, Cairo University, Egypt
tajpslc 2025
VOL. 7 / NO. 03 MARCH
FULL TEXT PP. 1-6
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 7
ISSUE 03
YEAR 2025
PAGES 1-6
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

The use of reward systems in prisons has been widely adopted as a mechanism for managing inmate behavior and promoting rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to examine the effects of reward systems on inmate behavior, prison management, and rehabilitation outcomes. A comprehensive search of academic databases was conducted, and studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed for quality and relevance. Results indicate that reward systems can have positive effects on promoting desirable behaviors, such as compliance with rules, participation in rehabilitative programs, and reduced recidivism. However, the effectiveness of reward systems is influenced by factors such as the type of reward, consistency of implementation, and the relationship between rewards and long-term behavior change. The review concludes that while reward systems can be a useful tool in prison management, their success depends on proper implementation and alignment with broader rehabilitation goals.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Reward Systems Prison Behavior Inmate Rehabilitation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Ainscough et al., 2017 T.S. Ainscough, A. McNeill, J. Strang, R. Calder, L.S. Brose
  2. Ali et al., 2016 A. Ali, S. Ghosh, A. Strydom, A. Hassiotis Prisoners with intellectual disabilities and detention status. Findings from a UK cross sectional study of prison Res. Dev. Disabil., 53–54 (2016), pp. 189-197
  3. Andrews and Bonta, 2010 D.A. Andrews, J. Bonta
  4. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (fifth ed.), Matthew Bender & Company Inc, New Providence, NJ (2010)
  5. Azrin and Holz, 1966 N.H. Azrin, W.C. Holz Punishment
  6. W.K. Honig (Ed.), Operant Behavior Areas of Research and Application, Appleton-Century- Crofts, New York, NY (1966), pp. 213-270
  7. Baumeister et al., 2001 R.F. Baumeister, E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, K.D. Vohs Bad is stronger than good Rev. Gen. Psychol., 5 (4) (2001), pp. 323-370
  8. Beaudry et al., 2021 G. Beaudry, R. Yu, A.E. Perry, S. Fazel Effectiveness of psychological interventions in prison to reduce recidivism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Lancet Psychiatr., 8 (9) (2021), pp. 759-773
  9. Benishek et al., 2014 L.A. Benishek, K.L. Dugosh, K.C. Kirby, J. Matejkowski, N.T. Clements, B.L. Seymour,D.S. Festinger Prize‐based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: a meta‐ analysis Addiction, 109 (9) (2014), pp. 1426-1436