Articles
| Open Access |
DOI: LEGAL AND ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN CROSS-BORDER ACCESS TO DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN CYBERSPACE
Sobirov Shokhrukhbek Tavakkal ugli , An independent applicant of Tashkent State University of Law, UzbekistanAbstract
The borderless nature of cyberspace presents significant challenges for the collection and management of electronic evidence in legal investigations. Data often traverses multiple jurisdictions, complicating the application of traditional legal principles and creating conflicts between state sovereignty, international cooperation, and the protection of individual rights. These complexities are further exacerbated by technological innovations such as cloud computing and anonymization tools, which obscure the physical location of data and users.
This study examines the legal, ethical, and procedural dimensions of cross-border evidence collection, emphasizing the need for harmonized international standards. By analyzing existing frameworks and identifying gaps, the research aims to propose actionable recommendations for balancing competing interests in cyberspace governance. The study highlights the importance of accountability, transparency, and collaboration among states, service providers, and individuals to ensure justice and equity in the digital age.
Keywords
Cyberspace, electronic evidence, cross-border cooperation
References
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. (2001). Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/the-budapest-convention
UNODC Model Law on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. (2007). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/
European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/
U.S. Congress. (2018). CLOUD Act (Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act). Public Law No: 115-141. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. General Assembly Resolution 217 A. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. General Assembly Resolution 2200A. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/
Second Additional Protocol to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. (2021). Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/protocols
United Nations Group of Governmental Experts (UNGGE). (2015). Reports on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/
Microsoft Ireland Case. (2018). U.S. v. Microsoft Corp., 584 U.S. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.gov/
European Court of Justice. (2014). Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González. Case C-131/12. Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sobirov Shokhrukhbek Tavakkal ugli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.