★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Political Science Law OPEN ACCESS

A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE CONSEQUENCES OF POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION INTERVENTIONS

Olowonihi A Peter
PhD Student City University, Cambodia
Christopher M Osazuwa
PhD Student City University, Cambodia
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajpslc/Volume06Issue09-09
tajpslc 2024
VOL. 6 / NO. 09 SEPTEMBER
FULL TEXT PP. 105-136
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 6
ISSUE 09
YEAR 2024
PAGES 105-136
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

This study examines the intricate dynamics of post-conflict reconstruction (PCR) to develop a conceptual framework for analysing the various consequences of interventions in this complicated field. The study employs a mixed-methods strategy combining a comprehensive literature assessment and conceptual analysis. The literature review explores multiple theoretical frameworks on PCR, including perspectives from political economics, development studies, and peacebuilding. Using the conceptual analysis approach, establishing a comprehensive framework is the outcome of a methodical investigation into the interaction between context, intervention, and outcomes in PCR. The paradigm is then utilized to analyse case studies of Rwanda, the Central African Republic, and The Gambia, offering practical observations and empirical evidence. The findings demonstrate that PCR treatments yield diverse outcomes, encompassing both intended and unanticipated consequences. The study highlights the crucial significance of contextual elements, such as the participation of global entities, power dynamics, and historical legacies, in determining the effectiveness of interventions.  The study determines that PCR is a complex and detailed process requiring a comprehensive understanding of the interaction between environment, intervention, and outcomes. The suggested conceptual framework offers a valuable tool for assessing the complex effects of PCR initiatives, allowing policymakers, practitioners, and scholars to create and execute more efficient and contextually appropriate interventions. The research highlights the importance of continuous efforts to advance evidence-based strategies that foster lasting peace and fair development in societies recovering from war. This helps to bridge the gap between theory and practical implementation.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Post-conflict reconstruction interventions consequences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. ACCORD. (2021). Effective Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Development for Peacebuilding in Africa. Retrieved from https://www.accord.org.za
  2. African Union (AU). (2006). The Policy Framework for Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Development (PCRD).
  3. African Union. (2021). Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Development (PCRD) Framework. Retrieved from https://au.int/en/documents/20210801/pcrd-framework
  4. Anand, P. B. (2022). Post-Conflict Recovery and Development in a Globalized World. In The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics (pp. 1-26). Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Ansoms, A., & Rostagno, L. (2012). Rwanda’s Vision 2020: Challenged by the Reality of Political and Economic Centralization. Review of African Political Economy, 39(131), 69-89.
  6. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2018). Strategy 2030.
  7. Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Autesserre, S. (2022). The Frontlines of Peace: An Insider's Guide to Changing the World. Oxford University Press.
  9. Barnett, M., & Weiss, T. G. (Eds.). (2021). Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Cornell University Press.
  10. Barnett, M., & Weiss, T. G. (Eds.). (2023). The Palgrave Handbook of the Ethics of Humanitarian Action. Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Bigombe, B. (2020). Field reflections on post-conflict reconstruction: the social imperatives of disarmament, demobilization and reintegration. The State of Peacebuilding in Africa, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46636-7_5
  12. Bøås, M., & Jennings, K. M. (2021). After Violence: The Politics of Post-Conflict Reconstruction. Oxford University Press.
  13. Booth, D., & Golooba-Mutebi, F. (2012). Governing development in Uganda: Understanding the dynamics of decentralisation and centralisation. Routledge.
  14. Bourhrous, A., Fazil, S., & O’Driscoll, D. (2022). Post-conflict reconstruction in the Nineveh plains of iraq: agriculture, cultural practices and social cohesion.. https://doi.org/10.55163/raep9560
  15. Bourhrous, H., Lakhdar, A., Ouali, U., & Cherif, A. (2022). Posttraumatic Growth and Social Support Among Genocide Survivors in Rwanda: A Moderated Mediation Model. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(7), 956–963.
  16. Brinkerhoff, D. W. and Johnson, R. W. (2009). Decentralized local governance in fragile states: learning from iraq. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(4), 585-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309349424
  17. Brown, A., Carter, L., & Lee, J. (2020). Post-conflict reconstruction: Assessing the impact of external interventions. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 15(3), 290-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620931739
  18. Brown, O., & McLeman, R. (2016). Climate change and security: A gathering storm. Georgetown University Press.
  19. Call, C. T. (2022). Why Peace Fails: The Causes and Prevention of Civil War Recurrence. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Call, C. T., & Wyeth, J. (2008). Building States to Build Peace. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  21. Caplan, R. (2019). The Failure of Peacebuilding: Why International Efforts to End War Don't Work. Oxford University Press.
  22. Ceesay, E. H., & Jallow, B. P. (2022). COVID-19 and the Gambian Economy: Impacts, Responses, and the Way Forward. The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 111(3), 301–313.
  23. Clark, P. (2010). The Gacaca Courts, Post-Genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda: Justice Without Lawyers. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Clark, P. (2010). The Gacaca courts, post-genocide justice and reconciliation in Rwanda: Justice without lawyers. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Collier, P., Elliott, V. L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal‐Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003). Breaking the conflict trap: civil war and development policy. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e504012013-001
  26. Dale, D. (2023). Post-Conflict Environmental Governance. Routledge.
  27. David Rugamba and Gitahi Njenga (2023). Women empowerment and post-conflict reconstruction: women for women ngo in rwanda. Journal of Public Policy &Amp; Governance, 7(3), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2242
  28. Earnest, D. C. (2006). The Fog of Peace: Planning and Executing the Restoration of Afghanistan. RAND Corporation.
  29. Earnest, J. (2015). Post-conflict reconstruction – a case study in kosovo. International Journal of Emergency Services, 4(1), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-02-2015-0009
  30. Eltringham, N. (2021). Accounting for horror: Post-genocide debates in Rwanda. University of Wisconsin Press.
  31. European Union. (2022). Integrated Approach to Post-Conflict Stabilization. Retrieved from https://europa.eu
  32. Fleischer, D. (2020). The Gambia's Post-Authoritarian Transition: Challenges and Opportunities. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341789007
  33. Fleischer, L. (2020). The Gambia's Truth, Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission: A Model for Transitional Justice? International Journal of Transitional Justice, 14(1), 182-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijz035
  34. Galletti, A. (2020). Conflict and Fragility in the Central African Republic: Prospects for Stability and Peacebuilding. Retrieved from https://www.riftvalley.net/index.php/publication/conflict-and-fragility-central-african-republic
  35. Garstka, G. J. (2010). Post-conflict urban planning: the regularization process of an informal neighborhood in kosova/o. Habitat International, 34(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.07.004
  36. Gellman, M. (2018). Contending with the Past: The Politics of Accountability in Post-Conflict Societies. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Ginty, R. M. (2010). No war, no peace: why so many peace processes fail to deliver peace. International Politics, 47(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.4
  38. Hillman, B. (2012). Public administration reform in post‐conflict societies: lessons from aceh, indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 33(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1643
  39. Hintjens, H. M. (2022). Explaining the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Routledge.
  40. Hollander, P. (2021). Rebuilding in the Central African Republic: Challenges of Post-Conflict Reconstruction. African Affairs, 120(479), 153-170. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/afraf/article/120/479/153/6271719
  41. Idris, I. (2022). Anti-corruption Measures in Post-conflict Reconstruction. doi: 10.19088/k4d.2022.082
  42. Ingelaere, B. (2016). Inside Rwanda’s gacaca courts: Local perceptions on reconciliation and participation. African Studies Review, 59(1), 79-102. [invalid URL removed]
  43. International Crisis Group. (2021). Central African Republic: After the Elections, Keeping Peace Alive. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/central-african-republic/central-african-republic-after-elections-keeping-peace-alive
  44. International Crisis Group. (2021). South Sudan’s Stalled Transition: Protecting the Peace Agreement and Preventing Violence. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org
  45. International Crisis Group. (2023). Central African Republic: A Difficult Road to Elections.
  46. Jarstad, A. K., & Sisk, T. D. (Eds.). (2018). From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge University Press.
  47. Jarstad, A. K., & Sisk, T. D. (Eds.). (2023). Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding. Routledge.
  48. Jaye, A. (2020). The Gambia’s democratic transition: prospects and challenges. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 38(1), 127–145.
  49. Jaye, T. (2020). Security Sector Reform in The Gambia: A Case Study in Post-Authoritarian Reconstruction. African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD). Retrieved from https://www.accord.org.za
  50. Laucht, C. and Allbeson, T. (2023). Twinned cities: reconciliation and reconstruction in europe after 1945 – an introduction. Urban History, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963926823000469
  51. Lavrik, O. I. et al. (2023). Exploring the Need for an Integrated Conflict Sensitivity Framework in Development Assistance that Contributes to Peaceful and Sustainable Post-conflict Societies.
  52. Le Billon, P. (2021). Corruption, Reconstruction and Peacebuilding. Routledge.
  53. Longman, T. (2011). Memory and Justice in Post-Genocide Rwanda. Cambridge University Press.
  54. Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan.
  55. Mac Ginty, R. (2021). Everyday Peace: Bottom-up and Local Agency in Conflict Zones. Oxford University Press.
  56. Mako, S. and Edgar, A. D. (2021). Evaluating the pitfalls of external state-building in post-2003 Iraq (2003–2021). Journal of Intervention and State building, 15(4), 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2021.1958292
  57. Mercy Corps. (2023). Peacebuilding & Conflict Transformation. Retrieved from https://www.mercycorps.org/
  58. Miller, S., & Davis, H. (2022). The paradox of peacebuilding: Challenges in post-conflict reconstruction. Global Governance, 28(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02802007
  59. Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Rwanda. (2021). Vision 2050. Retrieved from https://www.minecofin.gov.rw/vision-2050
  60. Newman, E., Paris, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2020). New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding. Oxford University Press.
  61. nsoms, A., & Rostagno, M. (2012). Rwanda’s Vision 2020 halfway through: What the eye does not see. Review of African Political Economy, 39(134), 545-562.
  62. O., I., Lavrik. (2023). Exploring the Need for an Integrated Conflict Sensitivity Framework in Development Assistance that Contributes to Peaceful and Sustainable Post-conflict Societies. World sustainability series, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7295-9_2
  63. OECD. (2020). States of Fragility 2020. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org
  64. P.S., Reddy., Juraj, Nemec. (2021). Introduction, Contextual Background and Scope. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-74966-8_1
  65. Paris, R. (2019). The International Peacebuilding Consensus Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.
  66. Paris, R. (2022). The Geopolitics of Peace. Oxford University Press.
  67. Pham, P. N., Weinstein, H. M., & Longman, T. (2015). Trauma and resilience among Rwandan genocide survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(2), 97-105.
  68. Rachel, A., Dicke. (2022). The efficacy of third-party interventions: international organization-led interventions into ongoing and post-conflict situations. doi: 10.32469/10355/91564
  69. Rawanda. (2020, March 8). Rwanda's Journey Towards Gender Equality. [invalid URL removed]
  70. Republic of The Gambia. (2021). National Development Plan (NDP) 2018-2021: Progress Report. Retrieved from https://ndp.gm
  71. Reyntjens, F. (2013). Political governance in post-genocide Rwanda. Cambridge University Press.
  72. Richmond, O. P. (2009). Peace in International Relations. Routledge.
  73. Rwanda Governance Board. (2020). Rwanda’s Post-Genocide Reconstruction: The Role of Leadership in Building a Resilient Nation. Retrieved from https://rgb.rw
  74. Saine, A. (2021). The Gambia's Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission: Confronting the Legacies of Authoritarianism. African Affairs, 120(478), 127–147.
  75. Saine, A. (2021). The Truth, Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission in The Gambia: Transitional Justice in a Post-Authoritarian Society. Journal of African Studies, 47(2), 123-140. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com
  76. Saul, M. (2022). The Concept of Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Contested Meanings and Disputed Applications. Routledge.
  77. Schwartz, A., & Halkyard, K. (2017). Post-Conflict Reconstruction as a Development Problem. World Development, pp. 98, 319–332.
  78. Seneviratne, K., Amaratunga, R., & Haigh, R. (2016). Managing housing needs in post-conflict reconstruction in Sri Lanka: gaps versus recommendations. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(1), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715x.2015.1101625
  79. Seneviratne, K., Amaratunga, R., & Haigh, R. (2017). Managing housing needs of post-conflict housing reconstruction: Sri Lankan perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(2), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2015-0157
  80. Smith, J., & Jones, R. (2021). The limits of Western models in post-conflict governance. International Studies Quarterly, 65(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa045
  81. Stewart, F. (2009). Policies towards horizontal inequalities in post-conflict reconstruction. Making Peace Work, 136–174. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595194_7
  82. Stewart, S. (2009). Rwanda: Rebuilding a nation through women's leadership. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 16(1), 69-80.
  83. Theron, K. (2021). Post-Conflict Development in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.
  84. Thomson, S. (2018). Rwanda: From Genocide to Precarious Peace. Yale University Press.
  85. Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index 2022.
  86. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2020). Regional Human Development Report for Latin America and the Caribbean 2020: Acting on the Future: Breaking the Intergenerational Transmission of Inequality.
  87. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
  88. United Nations. (2022). MINUSCA: The United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic. Retrieved from https://minusca.unmissions.org/en
  89. United Nations. (2022). Sustaining Peace Agenda. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/sustaining-peace
  90. Valentyna, Prasol., Viktoriya, Velichko., Giuseppe, T., Cirella., Olena, Konoplina., Y., Mizik., Liudmyla, Novoskoltseva. (2024). Adaptive Marketing Strategies for Post-Conflict Reconstruction, Regional Development, and Sustainable Growth in Ukraine. Contributions to economics, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-48735-4_17
  91. Williams, P., & Smith, J. (2023). Coordination and coherence in post-conflict reconstruction: Overcoming fragmentation. International Peacekeeping, 30(1), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2023.1957596
  92. World Bank. (2011). World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. World Bank.
  93. World Bank. (2021). Fragility, Conflict, and Violence Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fragilityconflictviolence
  94. World Bank. (2021). Monitoring and Evaluation in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations.
  95. World Bank. (2021). Rwanda Economic Update: Investing in People to Sustain Growth. World Bank Group.
  96. World Bank. (2021). Rwanda Poverty Assessment.
  97. World Bank. (2022). Central African Republic Economic Update: Investing in Human Capital to Promote Inclusive Recovery.
  98. Zahar, M. (2023). The Central African Republic’s 2020–2021 elections: a ‘pyrrhic victory’ for President Touadéra? Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 41(1), 1-17.
  99. Zahar, M.-J., & Mechoulan, D. (2021). The Central African Republic’s Political Agreement for Peace and Reconciliation: A Fragile Step Towards Peace. International Peace Institute. Retrieved from https://www.ipinst.org/2021/04/the-central-african-republics-political-agreement-for-peace-and-reconciliation
CONTINUE EXPLORING

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Explore other published research by the authors of this article.