★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Political Science Law OPEN ACCESS

REFUGEE STATUS AND TRANSFER TO THIRD COUNTRY: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL

Olowonihi A Peter
PhD Student City University, Cambodia
Christopher M Osazuwa
PhD Student City University, Cambodia
tajpslc 2024
VOL. 6 / NO. 09 SEPTEMBER
VOLUME 6
ISSUE 09
YEAR 2024
PAGES 40-63

Abstract

The seminar paper, Refugee Status and Transfer to Third Country: A Critical Appraisal, explores the intricacies and difficulties linked to the transfer of refugees to third countries. The text delves into these transfers' legal and ethical aspects, emphasizing the possibility of diffusing responsibility and undermining refugee protection. The paper utilizes a qualitative research methodology, incorporating a thorough literature review, case studies, and document analysis to explore the legal frameworks, policy implications, and humanitarian consequences of refugee transfers. The study's findings highlight the intricate nature of refugee transfers, which aim to offer long-lasting solutions and ease the burden on frontline states but frequently encounter substantial obstacles. This study highlights the significance of strong legal and institutional frameworks, fair distribution of responsibilities, and a focus on human rights to safeguard the well-being and protection of refugees during transfer processes. The paper also emphasizes the possibility of responsibility diffusion and the politicization of refugee transfers, which can weaken the effectiveness of the international refugee protection regime. Ultimately, the paper argues for a fairer and more balanced approach to safeguarding refugees' well-being and human rights. It emphasizes the importance of upholding the dignity of refugees and fostering global collaboration and burden-sharing. There is a need to enhance legal and procedural safeguards, tackle the underlying factors that lead to forced displacement, and promote comprehensive integration programs in third countries. The study's theoretical framework and empirical analysis provide a more profound comprehension of the intricacies of refugee transfers and offer valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners involved in refugee protection.

Keywords

Refugee Status Transfer Third Country

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aygün, A. H., Kırdar, M. G., Koyuncu, M., & Stoeffler, Q. (2024). Keeping refugee children in school and out of work: Evidence from the world's largest humanitarian cash transfer program. Journal of Development Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000154
  2. Blair, C. W., Grossman, G., & Weinstein, J. M. (2022). Forced displacement and asylum policy in the developing world. International Organization. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/forced-displacement-and-asylum-policy-in-the-developing-world/B89E49C17B0C96E9B9F5D234F190E77D
  3. Bloch, A. (2020). Reflections and directions for research in refugee studies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1677928
  4. Boucher, F., & Gördemann, J. (2021). The European Union and the global compacts on refugees and migration: A philosophical critique. Interventions, 23(1), 45-63.
  5. Brumat, L., Geddes, A., & Pettrachin, A. (2022). Making sense of the global: A systematic review of globalizing and localizing dynamics in refugee governance. Journal of Refugee Studies. https://academic.oup.com/jrs/article-abstract/35/2/827/6377227
  6. Byrne, R., Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., & Vedsted-Hansen, J. (2020). International refugee law between scholarship and practice. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaa011
  7. Coen, A. (2021). Can't be held responsible: Weak norms and refugee protection evasion. International Relations, 35(1), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819884613
  8. Devictor, X., Do, Q. T., & Levchenko, A. A. (2021). The globalization of refugee flows. Journal of Development Economics, 148, 102565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102565
  9. Donato, K. M., & Ferris, E. (2020). Refugee integration in Canada, Europe, and the United States: Perspectives from research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 690(1), 12-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271622094316
  10. Ermansons, G., Kienzler, H., Asif, Z., & Schofield, P. (2023). Refugee mental health and the role of place in the Global North countries: A scoping review. Health & Place. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829223000011
  11. Faist, T. (2021). The crucial meso-level: Migration systems and the dynamics of migration. In International migration, immobility and development (pp. 57-78). Routledge.
  12. Freier, L. F., & Gauci, J. P. (2020). Refugee rights across regions: A comparative overview of legislative good practices in Latin America and the EU. Refugee Survey Quarterly. https://academic.oup.com/rsq/article-abstract/39/3/321/5918923
  13. Freier, L. F., Micinski, N. R., & Tsourapas, G. (2021). Refugee commodification: The diffusion of refugee rent-seeking in the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 42(7), 1613-1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1956891
  14. Garcés-Mascareñas, B., & Moreno-Amador, G. (2020). The multilevel governance of refugee reception policies in Spain. Comillas International Journal. https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/handle/11531/44417
  15. Garlick, M., & Inder, C. (2021). Protection of refugees and migrants in the era of the global compacts: Ensuring support and avoiding gaps. Interventions, 23(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1854109
  16. Ghosn, F., Chu, T. S., Simon, M., & Braithwaite, A. (2021). The journey home: Violence, anchoring, and refugee decisions to return. American Political Science Review. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/journey-home-violence-anchoring-and-refugee-decisions-to-return/A1553AD2E0D18692309EF4A23DEC1383
  17. Giuffré, M. (2020). The readmission of asylum seekers under international law. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  18. Hailbronner, K. (2024). Immigration and asylum law and policy of the European Union. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zsn7EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=Refugee+Status+and+Transfer+to+Third+Country:+A+Critical+Appraisal&ots=Ces9Z84maK&sig=4lWNN-DdlmOuC5CqxYpIbZbBnsU
  19. Hammoud-Gallego, O., & Freier, L. F. (2023). Symbolic refugee protection: Explaining Latin America's liberal refugee laws. American Political Science Review. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/symbolic-refugee-protection-explaining-latin-americas-liberal-refugee-laws/C76C7712622C5DCB11ABD0F5DD5A680F
  20. Hatton, T. J. (2020). Asylum migration to the developed world: Persecution, incentives, and policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.1.75
  21. Hossain, A. N. M. (2022). Research methods for the study of refugee resettlement. AARMS – Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science, 21(2), 67-86. Retrieved from https://real.mtak.hu/136662/1/06-hossain-67-86-aarms-2021-2.pdf
  22. Kaya, A., & Nagel, A. K. (2021). Politics of subsidiarity in refugee reception: Comparative perspectives. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15562948.2021.1923881
  23. Kogan, I., & Kalter, F. (2020). An empirical–analytical approach to the study of recent refugee migrants in Germany. Soziale Welt. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27004991
  24. Korntheuer, A., Hynie, M., Kleist, M., & Farooqui, S. (2021). Inclusive resettlement? Integration pathways of resettled refugees with disabilities in Germany and Canada. Frontiers in Human Dynamics. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fhumd.2021.668264/full
  25. Lavenex, S., & Piper, N. (2022). Regions and global migration governance: Perspectives 'from above','from below'and 'from beyond'. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(3), 499-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1972564
  26. Linos, K., & Chachko, E. (2022). Refugee Responsibility Sharing or Responsibility Dumping?. Cal. L. Rev., 110, 233-293. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38HD7NS8N
  27. Mayda, A. M., Parsons, C., Pham, H., & Vézina, P. L. (2022). Refugees and foreign direct investment: Quasi-experimental evidence from US resettlements. Journal of Development Economics. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387822000025
  28. Memişoğlu, F., & Yavçan, B. (2022). Beyond ideology-a comparative analysis of how local governance can expand national integration policy: The case of Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1819780
  29. Milner, J., & Klassen, A. (2020). Civil society and the politics of the global refugee regime. Working Paper for the 70th Anniversary of the Refugee Convention. Carleton University.
  30. Moretti, S. (2021). Between refugee protection and migration management: The quest for coordination between UNHCR and IOM in the Asia-Pacific region. Third World Quarterly, 42(3), 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1780910
  31. Muftuler-Bac, M. (2020). Turkey and the European Union Refugee Deal: Assessing Turkish Migration Policies and the External Protection of European Borders. MAGYC. https://www.magyc.uliege.be/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-09/d2.2-v1june2020.pdf
  32. Oliver, C., Dekker, R., Geuijen, K., & Broadhead, J. (2020). Innovative strategies for the reception of asylum seekers and refugees in European cities: Multi-level governance, multi-sector urban networks, and local engagement. Comparative Migration Studies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40878-020-00189-y
  33. Ovacık, G. (2020). Compatibility of the safe third country concept with international refugee law and its application to Turkey. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 25(1), 17-38. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/perception/issue/56044/769635
  34. Phillimore, J. (2021). Refugee integration-opportunity structures: Shifting the focus from refugees to context. Journal of Refugee Studies. https://academic.oup.com/jrs/article-pdf/doi/10.1093/jrs/feaa012/39903673/feaa012.pdf
  35. Phillimore, J., Morrice, L., Kabe, K., & Hashimoto, N. (2021). Economic self-reliance or social relations? What works in refugee integration? Learning from resettlement programmes in Japan and the UK. Comparative Migration Studies. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40878-021-00223-7
  36. Schultz, J. (2020). An end to asylum?: Temporary protection and the erosion of refugee status. In Waiting and the temporalities of irregular migration (pp. 183-205). Routledge.
  37. Shaffer, R., Pinson, L. E., & Chu, J. A. (2020). Local elected officials' receptivity to refugee resettlement in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(49), 31263-31269. Retrieved from https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2015637117
  38. Smith, C. D. (2020). A model for the world? Policy transfer theory and the challenges to "exporting" private sponsorship to Europe. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780228002758-018/pdf?licenseType=restricted
  39. Tran, V. C., & Lara-García, F. (2020). A new beginning: Early refugee integration in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 6(3), 117-138. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2020.6.3.07
  40. Triggs, G. D., & Wall, P. C. J. (2020). 'The makings of a success': The global compact on refugees and the inaugural global refugee forum. International Journal of Refugee Law. https://academic.oup.com/ijrl/article-abstract/32/2/283/5909152
  41. Wachter, K., Bunn, M., & Schuster, R. C. (2022). A scoping review of social support research among refugees in resettlement: Implications for conceptual and empirical research. Journal of Refugee Studies. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/jrs/article-abstract/35/1/368/6295726
  42. Welfens, N., & Bonjour, S. (2021). Families first? The mobilization of family norms in refugee resettlement. International Political Sociology. https://academic.oup.com/ips/article-abstract/15/2/212/5959724
  43. Whitaker, B. E. (2020). Refugees, foreign nationals, and Wageni: Comparing African responses to Somali migration. African Studies Review. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/african-studies-review/article/refugees-foreign-nationals-and-wageni-comparing-african-responses-to-somali-migration/492F6D644C2B324997D94135E7FDCF33
  44. Yıldız, U., & Sert, D. Ş. (2021). Dynamics of mobility-stasis in refugee journeys: Case of resettlement from Turkey to Canada. Migration Studies, 9(2), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz019
  45. Zetter, R. (2021). Theorizing the refugee humanitarian-development nexus: A political-economy analysis. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), 1766-1786. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa054
CONTINUE EXPLORING

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Explore other published research by the authors of this article.