The article analyzes the current state of the issue of introducing artificial intelligence into criminal proceedings, its legal codification in the European Ethics Charter (CEPEJ) and the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. The author examines the issues of using algorithms in criminal proceedings in some foreign countries. The work substantiates the thesis that the inevitable digitalization of the criminal process should help assist the judge in organizational and legal activities, ensure openness, transparency of justice, guarantee the rights and interests of citizens, rights to defense, simplify paperwork and speed up trials. It is impossible to replace a judge with artificial intelligence, since sentencing is related to the moral values, professional and everyday experience of the judge, which cannot be provided by an automated system.

criminal proceedings, artificial intelligence, quality of justice

Jones M. T. Programming artificial intelligence in applications / M. Tim Jones; lane from English Osipov A.I.M.: DMK Press, 2011. 312 p.

Averkin A. N., Gaase-Rapoport M. G., Pospelov D. A. Explanatory dictionary on artificial intelligence. M.: Radio and communication, 1992. P. 256. URL: http://www.raai.org/ (10.10.2020).

Filipova I.A. Legal regulation of artificial intelligence:study guide, 2nd edition, updated and expanded – Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University, 2022. – 69 p. Shafer S. A. Evidence and proof in criminal cases. -M. : Norma, 2008, pp. 32-36.

Alikperov Kh.D. Electronic technology for determining punishment (“Electronic scales of justice”). SPb.: Legal. center, 2020.

Alikperov Kh.D. Unexplored facets of punishment and the secrets of its existence (“The Doctrine of the Inhumanity of Punishment”). SPb.: Legal. center, 2020.

The CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Judicial Systems and their Environment dated December 4, 2018. URL: https://rm.coe.int/presentation-note-en-for-publication- 4-december-2018/16808f699d (accessed 04/22/2023)

Calo R, Froomkin M, Kerr I (2016) Robot Law. Edward Elgar Publish. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476732

Darling K (2012) Extending legal rights to social robots. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2044797

Hallevy G (2010) The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1564096

Geenstein S. Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI) Artificial Intelligence Review volume. 2022

Great Britain. Dept. for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2018) Industrial Strategy: Artificial Intelligence Sector Deal. [Online] Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/702810/180425_BEIS_AI_ Sector_Deal__4_pdf (accessed 22.04.2023).

Jones M. T. Programming of artificial intelligence in applications. Hardcover March 20, 2018

Kanapala Ambedkar, Sukomal Pal & Rajendra Pamula Text summarization from legal documents: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review volume 51, pages 371–402 (2019)Cite this article

Karnouskos S. Symbiosis with artificial intelligence via the prism of law, robots, and society. Artificial Intelligence Review. May 2021

Katz, D., Bommarito, I.M. & Blackmann, J. (2017) A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PLOS ONE. 4 (12). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174698

Suyunova D., Shamsutdinov B. Digitalization of criminal proceedings in the context of the coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) in Uzbekistan //Medico-Legal Update. – 2021. – P. 455-459.

D.J.Suyunova -Participant Rights Feature in Electronic Criminal Proceedings. BBC, 2023

Suyunova D.Zh. On the issue of electronic criminal proceedings // Scientific school of criminal procedure and criminology of St. Petersburg State University. 2021.No. 3. – P.318-322.