★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Political Science Law OPEN ACCESS

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACTS ON PERMISSIBLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FREEDOM OF SCIENCE

Aslonova Laylo
Lecturer At The Department Of Constitutional Law, Tashkent State University Of Law, Uzbekistan
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajpslc/Volume05Issue08-05
tajpslc 2023
VOL. 5 / NO. 08 AUGUST
FULL TEXT PP. 19-27
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 5
ISSUE 08
YEAR 2023
PAGES 19-27
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

This article analyzes the legislation of foreign countries, as well as precedents for restricting the freedom of science. The article cites the laws of foreign countries, such as the USA, Sweden, France, Canada and others, which regulate the limitations of the subject of scientific research. In addition, the precedent of the French court on this issue is given. As a result of this article, a comparative analysis of the regulation by legal acts of the Republic of Uzbekistan of the admissibility of restricting the freedom of scientific creativity is carried out.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Scientific research embryo state secret

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 01.05.2023/ https://lex.uz/docs/6445147
  2. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On the protection of state secrets”. 07.05.1993, № 848-XII/ https://lex.uz/docs/98845
  3. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Licensing, Permitting and Notification Procedures”. 14.07.2021 г. № ЗРУ-701 / https://lex.uz/ru/docs/5511900#5518907
  4. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On the use of atomic energy for peaceful purposes". 09.09.2019 г. № ЗРУ-565/ https://lex.uz/docs/4506948
  5. Закон от 27 июня 2018 года о внесении изменений в Закон об Институте национальной памяти/ http://eli.gov.pl/eli/DU/2018/1277/ogl/pol
  6. Ustawa z dnia 26 stycznia 2018 r. o zmiane ustawy o Institucie Pamięci Narodowi – Komisji Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu // Dz. U. z 2018 r. Poz. 369.
  7. Directive 2010/64/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 22 septembre 2010 relative à la protection des animaux utilisées à des fins scientifiques // JO L 276 du 20.10.2010. P. 33.
  8. Commission canadienne de sûreté nucléaire. Compte rendu des déliberations, y compris les motifs de décision à égard de demandeur: Centre canadien de rayonnement synchrotron. Objet: Demande de modification de permis d’exploitation d’un accélérateur de particules de catégorie IB. Date de l’audience: 30 mars 2015.
  9. Loi sur la sûreté et la réglementation nucléaires // Lois du Canada 1997, chapitre 9. URL: (дата обращения: 11 июня 2020 г.).
  10. Аслонова. Л. 2022. История возникновения конституционного права на свободу научного творчества. Общество и инновации. 3, 11/S (дек. 2022), 235–245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss11/S-pp235-245.
  11. Аслонова. Л. 2023. Сравнительно-правовой анализ закрепления права на науку в конституциях стран мира. Общество и инновации. 4, 1/S (янв. 2023), 186–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol4-iss1-pp186-195.