THE MAIN CRITERIA FOR THE QUALITY OF COURT DECISIONS
Rakhimov Azizjon , Judge of the Tashkent regional Administrative Court, UzbekistanAbstract
The article discusses the main indicators of the quality of judicial acts such as legality, validity, consistency, correctness. The author points out the difference between the validity and legality of court decisions. It explains the inadmissibility of using slang, local dialects in a court decision, which lead to a negative perception of judicial acts by society.
Keywords
Judicial act, jurisdictional procedures, legality, validity, consistency
References
Закон Республики Узбекистан от 22.09.1994 г. № 2013-XII
Собрание законодательство Республики Узбекистан 2018 г., № 4
Собрание законодательство Республики Узбекистан 2018 г., № 4
Собрание законодательство Республики Узбекистан 2018 г., № 4
Закон Республики Узбекистан от 22.09.1994 г. № 2013-XII
Э.Аннерс История европейского право. М., 1994, С 7
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2022 The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.