Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue12-20

CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS ON THE FEATURES OF THE PROCEDURAL FORM OF THEIR PRODUCTION

Ulzana Rakhimova , Lecturer of the Department of Criminal procedure, Law of Tashkent state university of law, Uzbekistan
Alisher Muhitdinov , Associate Professor of the Department of Judicial Law and Prosecutor's Supervision, Tajik State University of Law, Business and Politics, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The article examines and analyzes procedural aspects and issues related to the following types of forensic examination: primary, repeated, additional, commission and complex forensic examination. The differences in the norms of procedural legislation encourages us to unify legal regulations on the institution of forensic examination, which by its very nature is not complete.

Keywords

Classification, forensic examination, primary examination

References

Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/docs/111463

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On forensic examination". https://lex.uz/docs/1633100

Forensic examination in civil law processes. Scientific and practical manual, ed. E.R. Rossinskaya Publishing house "Prospect", 2018.

Arinushkin G.P. Comprehensive examination requires regulation // Socialist legality. 1977. N 10. Rossinskaya E.R. Forensic examination in civil, arbitration, administrative and criminal proceedings. - M .: Norma, 2013 .-- S. 190.

Orlov Yu. K. Modern problems of proving and using special knowledge in criminal proceedings: scientific textbook. allowance. M., 2016.S. 208.

Rakhimova U. RELEVANT ISSUES OF DNA EXAMINATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN //BRIDGE TO SCIENCE: RESEARCH WORKS. – 2019. – С. 19.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Ulzana Rakhimova, & Alisher Muhitdinov. (2021). CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS ON THE FEATURES OF THE PROCEDURAL FORM OF THEIR PRODUCTION. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 3(12), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue12-20