Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue10-05

Main Guarantees Of The Independence Of Judges

Hamidov Anvar Muzafarovich , Lecturer At The Department Of Administrative Law At The Supreme School Of Judges Under The Supreme Judicial Council Of The Republic Of Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article provides the theoretical and legal analysis of the ongoing judicial reforms in the Republic of Uzbekistan, the issues of the independence and inviolability of judges, the inadmissibility of interference in the administration of justice, the secrecy of judicial meeting, inadmissibility of disrespect towards judges, the liability for interference into the inviolability of judges.

Keywords

Independence Of Judges, Immunity Of Judges, Justice, Disciplinary And Administrative Liability Of Judges, Humanity, Legitimacy, Fairness, Impartiality And Transparency, Protection Of Justice

References

Basic principles of independence of the judiciary, adopted by the Seventh United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and the Treatment of Offenders held in Milan from 26 August to 6 September 1985 and approved by UN General Assembly Resolution 40/32 of 29 November 1985. // International law enforcement documents: collection. –Tashkent: “Adolat”, 2004. –B. 110-11.

Universal Charter of Judges, International Association of Judges. November 17, 1999.

The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. “Uzbekistan” 2018. – p.76.

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Courts" // National Database of Legislation, 29.07.2021, No. 03/21/703/0723.

Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated December 7, 2020 No PF-6127 "On measures to ensure genuine independence of judges and increase the effectiveness of prevention of corruption in the judiciary" // National Database of Legislation, 07.12.2020, 06 / 20/6127/1609-son.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Hamidov Anvar Muzafarovich. (2021). Main Guarantees Of The Independence Of Judges. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 3(10), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue10-05