Invalidity Of A Contract Concluded As A Result Of Improper Use Of Material Rights (Property Rights) And Abuse Of Law
Mamurov Shokhrukh Boboxonovich , Independent Researcher At The Tashkent State University Of Law, UzbekistanAbstract
This article is aimed invalidity of a contract concluded as a result of improper use of material rights (property rights) and abuse of law. In addition to actions aimed at abuse of property rights constituting a violation, actions that disproportionately violate the rights and legitimate interests of neighbors (the benefit received by the owner, disproportionate to the inconvenience for the neighbor) can also be assessed as abuse. Invalidation of the agreement on the disposal of prohibited property to unscrupulous third parties allows the creditor to bring a claim for the seizure of property from the unscrupulous third party, and in the event of a substantial claim by the plaintiff, to obtain an excuse from the unscrupulous owner. Naturally, a refund request can be combined with a request to invalidate the transaction. At the same time, according to the logic of things, in cases of bad faith of the owner of the prohibited property, it is necessary to invalidate not only the transfer of property, but also the entire contract
Keywords
Abuse of law, invalidity of a contract
References
Whittaker S. Comments on ‘Abuse of Law’ in European Private Law // Prohibition of Abuse of Law: A General Principle of EU Law? (= Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law. Vol. 13) / R. de la Feria, St. Vogenauer (eds.). Hart Pub., 2011. P. 253–261.
Basic provisions of civil law: article-by-article commentary to articles 1-16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic edition. Revision 1.0]; A.G. Karapetov. - Moscow: M-Logos, 2020 .- 1469 p. P. 854.
Tserkovnikov M.A. On conscientiousness in the institutions of property law // Bulletin of civil law. 2017.Vol. 17.No. 2. P. 24–30.
Porotikova O.A. The problem of abuse of subjective civil law. M .: Walters Kluver, 2007. P. 182.
Digests of Justinian / Per. from lat. T. III. M .: Statut, 2003. P. 291.
Miller, P. B. (2011). A Theory of Fiduciary Liability. McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill, 56 (2), 235–288. https://doi.org/10.7202/1002367ar.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2020 The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.