Publication Ethics
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research (TAJHFR)
ISSN: 2689-0976
The American Journal of Horticulture and Floriculture Research is committed to integrity, transparency, and accountability in scholarly publishing. Authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher share responsibility for maintaining ethical standards throughout submission, peer review, and publication.
1. Originality and Proper Attribution
Authors must submit original work and acknowledge all sources appropriately. Plagiarism—including unattributed use of text, ideas, data, images, code, or methods—is unacceptable.
Reuse of previously published material must be cited and disclosed. Authors must obtain permission for third-party content where required and identify any separate copyright or licensing conditions.
2. Accurate and Transparent Reporting
Research methods, experimental conditions, observations, analyses, and conclusions must be reported honestly and accurately.
The journal does not accept:
-
Fabricated or falsified data.
-
Invented field observations or experimental measurements.
-
Deceptive manipulation of plant photographs, microscopy images, or figures.
-
Selective reporting that materially misrepresents findings.
-
Unsupported claims about yield, plant health, treatment effectiveness, or product quality.
Authors must describe relevant controls, sampling units, replication, and statistical procedures accurately. Biological replication must be distinguished from technical replication and repeated measurements.
Relevant uncertainty, limitations, and environmental conditions must be disclosed.
3. Exclusive Submission and Duplicate Publication
A manuscript must not be submitted to another journal while under consideration by TAJHFR. Previously published research must not be presented as new work.
Authors must disclose related manuscripts, preprints, conference papers, and substantial overlap with earlier publications. Secondary analyses must identify the original data and explain their distinct contribution.
An extended conference paper must cite the earlier version, explain the additional contribution, and comply with applicable copyright conditions.
4. Authorship and Contributions
Authorship should reflect substantial intellectual contributions to the research and manuscript. All listed authors must approve the final submission and accept accountability for their contributions.
Individuals whose contributions do not qualify for authorship should be acknowledged with their permission. Gift, guest, purchased, and ghost authorship are unacceptable.
Changes to author names or order require an explanation and written agreement from all affected authors. Unresolved authorship disputes may delay assessment or publication.
5. Plant Materials and Research Permissions
Authors must accurately identify the plant species, cultivars, varieties, rootstocks, and accessions used in their research.
Relevant sources of plant material and applicable collection, transfer, or use permissions must be stated. Research involving protected species, restricted sites, or private land must have appropriate authorization.
Authors must respect applicable conditions governing genetic resources, proprietary cultivars, and community-held knowledge.
6. Environmental Responsibility and Biosafety
Research involving pesticides, fertilizers, genetically modified organisms, pathogens, or other regulated materials must follow applicable institutional and regulatory requirements.
Authors must describe relevant biosafety, containment, and environmental safeguards. Field trials should address potential effects on surrounding crops, ecosystems, beneficial organisms, and local communities where relevant.
Claims of environmental benefit or sustainability must be supported by evidence and clearly defined assessment criteria.
7. Human Participants and Animal Research
Studies involving growers, workers, consumers, or other human participants must include appropriate ethics approval or exemption information where required.
Participation must be voluntary, with informed consent and protection of confidentiality as applicable. Identifiable information requires appropriate consent for publication.
Research involving animals must include relevant approval information and safeguards for animal welfare.
8. Data, Code, and Reproducibility
Authors must retain supporting research records and may be asked to provide data, analytical code, protocols, or other documentation during assessment or investigation.
Manuscripts should include a data availability statement and, where relevant, a code availability statement. Restrictions arising from confidentiality, licensing, intellectual property, or other legitimate requirements must be explained.
Datasets, software, and research resources developed by others must be cited appropriately and used in accordance with their licenses.
9. Funding and Conflicts of Interest
Authors must disclose funding sources and relevant financial or non-financial interests that could influence the research or its interpretation.
Relevant interests may include employment, consultancy, patents, plant variety rights, ownership interests, or relationships with suppliers of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, equipment, or other products evaluated in the study.
The funder’s role in study design, data collection, analysis, writing, and publication decisions must be stated. If no relevant conflicts exist, an explicit declaration should be included.
10. Responsibilities of Editors
Editors must assess manuscripts fairly according to scientific quality, originality, relevance, methodological rigor, and ethical integrity.
Editors must:
-
Protect manuscript confidentiality.
-
Select reviewers with appropriate expertise.
-
Manage conflicts of interest and recuse themselves where necessary.
-
Make decisions without discrimination based on authors’ personal characteristics or institutional affiliation.
-
Investigate credible concerns about submitted or published work.
-
Keep editorial decisions independent of payments and commercial interests.
Submissions from editors or editorial board members must receive independent handling. The submitting individual must not participate in reviewer selection or the decision on their own manuscript.
11. Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers must provide objective, constructive, respectful, and timely assessments. They should decline assignments when they lack appropriate expertise, cannot complete the review, or have a conflict that compromises impartiality.
Reviewers must not disclose confidential material, use unpublished findings for personal advantage, or contact authors directly about the review without authorization.
Suspected plagiarism, data irregularities, substantial overlap, or ethical concerns must be reported to the editor. Citation requests must have a scholarly justification and must not primarily serve to increase personal or journal citation counts.
12. Use of Artificial Intelligence
Authors must disclose substantive use of generative AI in manuscript preparation, analysis, or content creation, identifying the tool and explaining its purpose.
When AI forms part of the research method, authors must describe relevant models, data, evaluation procedures, and limitations sufficiently for assessment.
AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Human authors remain responsible for accuracy, originality, references, and research integrity.
AI-generated content must not be presented as genuine field observations, plant images, experimental measurements, or collected research data. Legitimate use of synthetic data must be clearly identified and explained.
Editors and reviewers must not upload confidential manuscripts, proprietary information, or unpublished research data to external AI services without appropriate authorization and confidentiality protections.
13. Unacceptable Publishing Practices
The journal does not accept:
-
Plagiarism, data fabrication, or falsification.
-
Paper-mill submissions or purchased manuscripts.
-
Fraudulent authorship or fabricated reviewer identities.
-
Manipulation of peer review.
-
Coercive citations or coordinated citation manipulation.
-
False statements about approvals, permissions, funding, or conflicts of interest.
-
Deliberate misrepresentation of submission, acceptance, or publication dates.
Publication charges do not guarantee acceptance or influence editorial decisions.
14. Complaints and Investigations
Suspected misconduct should be reported to the editorial office with relevant article details and supporting evidence.
The journal will assess concerns fairly, seek explanations from the individuals involved, and examine available documentation. Where appropriate, it may contact institutions, funders, ethics committees, or other responsible bodies.
Actions may include requesting clarification, suspending assessment, rejecting a submission, publishing an editorial notice, or correcting the scholarly record. Decisions will reflect the evidence and seriousness of the concern.
15. Corrections, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions
A correction may be issued when an error affects part of an article without invalidating its overall findings.
An expression of concern may be issued when a serious concern remains unresolved or an investigation is ongoing.
A retraction may be issued when findings are unreliable or publication involved a serious ethical breach. Retraction notices will explain the reason and link to the affected article. Retracted articles will normally remain accessible and clearly marked to preserve the scholarly record.
Authors must promptly report significant errors and cooperate in correcting their published work.
16. Appeals
Authors may appeal an editorial decision by submitting a reasoned explanation and supporting evidence. Appeals will be assessed fairly, with independent editorial input where appropriate.
An appeal does not guarantee that the original decision will be changed.
Contact
Questions, complaints, appeals, and reports of suspected misconduct should be directed to the editorial office through the journal’s official Contact page.