★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Applied Sciences OPEN ACCESS

Advanced Industrial Stormwater Management in Dense Urban Environments: Lessons from New York City

Santunu Barua
Master of Science in Environmental Engineering, Manhattan University, NY, USA
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajas/Volume08Issue01-10
tajas 2026
VOL. 8 / NO. 01 JANUARY
FULL TEXT PP. 100-123
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 8
ISSUE 01
YEAR 2026
PAGES 100-123
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

The high rate of urbanization, the growing rate of industrialization, and climate-related events of extreme precipitation have greatly increased the complexity of the stormwater management demands in major cities around the world. The city of New York (NYC) has a high impervious surface coverage, antiquated mixed sewerage systems, and dense industrial land cover, indicating that it is a high-risk location regarding the assessment of advanced industrial stormwater management control measures. The study is a literature-based systematic investigation of the success of modern stormwater management strategies in use in industrial areas in NYC, specifically focusing on hybrid green-through gray infrastructure systems. The study conducted a synthesis of regulatory reports, hydrological monitoring datasets, and empirical studies by peer reviewers in order to determine quantitative results regarding runoff volume reduction, reduction of pollutant loads, and combined sewer overflow (CSO) control with the help of a secondary-data-driven research design. It has been shown that the following advanced industrial stormwater interventions have been associated with significant decreases in total suspended solids, nutrient loads and peak runoff volumes: bioswales, green roofs, subsurface detention systems and smart monitoring technologies, and also improved regulatory compliance in federal and municipal systems. In addition, it has been indicated that integrated infrastructure models would be more efficient in terms of cost and the benefits of resilience over the long term than the traditional end-of-pipe solutions. The novelty of the study consists in the synthesis of the industrial-scale stormwater management in the dense urban morphology with a specific focus on the and explicit connection of technological performance, regulatory implementation, and environmental performance. This study can be generalized to policymakers, urban planners and industrial stakeholders wishing to develop robust data-driven stormwater infrastructure in comparably limited urban areas by generalizing empirical experiences in NYC.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Industrial stormwater management Urban hydrology Green infrastructure Combined sewer overflow New York City

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Ahiablame, L. M., Engel, B. A., & Chaubey, I. (2012). Effectiveness of low impact development practices: Literature review and suggestions for future research. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, *223*(7), 4253–4273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
  2. Alizadehtazi, B., Montalto, F. A., & Gurian, P. L. (2020). Evaluation of the seasonal performance of a blue-green roof using a novel, integrated water, energy and nitrogen model. Hydrological Processes, *34*(20), 3953–3967. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13858
  3. Anderson, B. C., Watt, W. E., & Marsalek, J. (2016). Critical issues for stormwater ponds: Learning from a decade of research. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, *59*(5), 828–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1044569
  4. Ashley, R. M., Balmforth, D. J., Saul, A. J., & Blanksby, J. D. (2011). Flooding in the future – Predicting climate change, risks and responses in urban areas. Water Science and Technology, *64*(2), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.698
  5. Barbosa, A. E., Fernandes, J. N., & David, L. M. (2012). Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Research, *46*(20), 6787–6798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.029
  6. Berndtsson, J. C. (2010). Green roof performance towards management of runoff water quantity and quality: A review. Ecological Engineering, *36*(4), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.12.014
  7. Brown, R. R., Keath, N., & Wong, T. H. F. (2009). Urban water management in cities: Historical, current and future regimes. Water Science and Technology, *59*(5), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.029
  8. Burton, G. A., Jr., & Pitt, R. (2002). Stormwater effects handbook: A toolbox for watershed managers, scientists, and engineers. Lewis Publishers.
  9. Davis, A. P. (2005). Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environmental Science & Technology, *39*(16), 338A–344A. https://doi.org/10.1021/es053327e
  10. Dietz, M. E. (2007). Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, *186*(1-4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z
  11. Drake, J., Bradford, A., & Marsalek, J. (2014). Review of environmental performance of permeable pavement systems: State of the knowledge. Water Quality Research Journal, *49*(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2014.015
  12. Eckart, K., McPhee, Z., & Bolisetti, T. (2018). Performance and implementation of low impact development – A review. Science of The Total Environment, *607-608*, 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.020
  13. Eisenberg, B., Lindow, K. C., & Smith, D. R. (2015). Permeable pavements. American Society of Civil Engineers Press.
  14. Fassman, E. A., & Blackbourn, S. (2011). Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, *16*(11), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000386
  15. Field, R., & O’Shea, M. L. (1993). The detection, occurrence, and treatment of combined sewer overflows. Water Science and Technology, *27*(12), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1993.0335
  16. Fletcher, T. D., Andrieu, H., & Hamel, P. (2013). Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art. Advances in Water Resources, *51*, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001
  17. Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J.-L., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rivard, G., Uhl, M., Dagenais, D., & Viklander, M. (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, *12*(7), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
  18. Gaffield, S. J., Goo, R. L., Richards, L. A., & Jackson, R. J. (2003). Public health effects of inadequately managed stormwater runoff. American Journal of Public Health, *93*(9), 1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1527
  19. Gersonius, B., Ashley, R., Pathirana, A., & Zevenbergen, C. (2013). Climate change uncertainty: Building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure. Climatic Change, *116*(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0494-5
  20. Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., & Sharkey, L. J. (2006). Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, *132*(6), 600–608. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600)
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Jones, J. E., Kessler, K. E., & Brown, R. R. (2019). Industrial stormwater management: A regulatory analysis and guide for best management practice implementation. Journal of Environmental Management, *231*, 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.054
  23. Kappeler, A., Montalto, F. A., & Matonse, A. H. (2019). Optimizing the integration of green and gray infrastructure to meet stormwater management goals under climate change. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, *145*(12), 04019055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001115
  24. Kerkez, B., Gruden, C., Lewis, M., Montestruque, L., Quigley, M., Wong, B., Bedig, A., Kertesz, R., Braun, T., Cadwalader, O., Poresky, A., & Pak, C. (2016). Smarter stormwater systems. Environmental Science & Technology, *50*(14), 7267–7273. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05870
  25. Khan, U. T., & Valeo, C. (2016). A decision support system for selection of stormwater management alternatives in urban environments. Journal of Environmental Management, *169*, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.021
  26. Kirshen, P., Caputo, L., Vogel, R. M., Mathisen, P., Rosner, A., & Renaud, T. (2014). Adapting urban infrastructure to climate change: A drainage case study. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, *141*(4), 04014064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000443
  27. Kuichling, E. (1889). The relation between the rainfall and the discharge of sewers in populous districts. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, *20*(1), 1–56.
  28. Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2009). Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. Journal of Environmental Engineering, *135*(8), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000026
  29. Liu, J., Sample, D. J., Bell, C., & Guan, Y. (2014). Review and research needs of bioretention used for the treatment of urban stormwater. Water, *6*(4), 1069–1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6041069
  30. Liu, Y., Engel, B. A., Flanagan, D. C., Gitau, M. W., McMillan, S. K., & Chaubey, I. (2017). A review on effectiveness of best management practices in improving hydrology and water quality: Needs and opportunities. Science of The Total Environment, *601-602*, 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.212
  31. Lund, N. S. V., Falk, A. K. V., Borup, M., Madsen, H., & Mikkelsen, P. S. (2018). Model predictive control of urban drainage systems: A review and perspective towards smart real-time water management. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, *48*(3), 279–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1455484
  32. Makepeace, D. K., Smith, D. W., & Stanley, S. J. (1995). Urban stormwater quality: Summary of contaminant data. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, *25*(2), 93–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389509388476
  33. Miles, B., & Band, L. E. (2015). Green infrastructure stormwater management at the watershed scale: Urban variable source area and watershed capacitance. Hydrological Processes, *29*(9), 2268–2274. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10448
  34. Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Stouffer, R. J. (2008). Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, *319*(5863), 573–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915
  35. Montalto, F. A., Bartrand, T. A., Waldman, A. M., Travaline, K. A., Loomis, C. H., McAfee, C., Geldi, J. M., Riggall, G. E., & Biales, A. D. (2020). Decentralized green infrastructure: The importance of stakeholder behavior in determining spatial and temporal outcomes. Water, *12*(5), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051309
  36. Mullapudi, A., Wong, B. P., & Kerkez, B. (2017). Emerging investigators series: Building a theory for smart stormwater systems. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, *3*(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EW00211K
  37. New York City Department of Environmental Protection. (2010). NYC green infrastructure plan. NYC DEP. https://www.nyc.gov/site/dep/water/green-infrastructure.page
  38. New York City Department of Environmental Protection. (2018). NYC stormwater resilience plan. NYC DEP. https://www.nyc.gov/site/orr/reports/stormwater-resilience-plan.page
  39. New York City Department of Environmental Protection. (2019). Green infrastructure performance metrics report. NYC DEP. https://www.nyc.gov/site/dep/water/green-infrastructure-performance.page
  40. New York City Mayor’s Office of Resiliency. (2021). New York City stormwater resilience plan. NYC Mayor's Office. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/orr/pdf/Stormwater_Resilience_Plan_FINAL_Web.pdf
  41. O’Donnell, E. C., Lamond, J. E., & Thorne, C. R. (2020). Recognising barriers to implementation of Blue-Green Infrastructure: A Newcastle case study. Urban Water Journal, *14*(9), 964–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2017.1279190
  42. Palmer, M. A., Liu, J., Matthews, J. H., Mumba, M., & D’Odorico, P. (2015). Manage water in a green way. Science, *349*(6248), 584–585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7778
  43. Pitt, R., Field, R., Lalor, M., & Brown, M. (1995). Urban stormwater toxic pollutants: Assessment, sources, and treatability. Water Environment Research, *67*(3), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143095X131466
  44. Qin, Y. (2020). A review on the development of urban stormwater modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, *123*, 104587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104587
  45. Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W. D., & Horton, R. M. (2018). New York City panel on climate change 2018 report chapter 1: Introduction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, *1439*(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13909
  46. Roy, A. H., Wenger, S. J., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., Ladson, A. R., Shuster, W. D., Thurston, H. W., & Brown, R. R. (2008). Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environmental Management, *42*(2), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1
  47. Sadler, J. M., Goodall, J. L., Morsy, M. M., & Spencer, K. (2020). Modeling urban coastal flood mitigation from green infrastructure practices under climate change scenarios. Water Resources Management, *34*(15), 4647–4665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02673-7
  48. Savic, D., Morley, M., & Khoury, M. (2014). Smart water systems: A review of ICT solutions for the water sector. Procedia Engineering, *89*, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.184
  49. Shuster, W. D., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., & Smith, D. R. (2005). Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. Urban Water Journal, *2*(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620500386529
  50. Sitzenfrei, R., Möderl, M., & Rauch, W. (2020). A multi-objective approach for designing and assessing the performance of smart water systems. Water, *12*(2), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020520
  51. Tirpak, R. A., Hathaway, J. M., Khojandi, A., & Epps, T. H. (2021). Industrial stormwater management and treatment: A review of current practices and emerging technologies. Journal of Environmental Management, *282*, 111946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111946
  52. Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, *81*(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
  53. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2004). Report to Congress: Impacts and control of CSOs and SSOs (EPA 833-R-04-001). U.S. EPA.
  54. Urbonas, B., & Stahre, P. (1993). Stormwater best management practices and detention. Prentice Hall.
  55. Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P. (2005). The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, *24*(3), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1899/04-028.1
  56. Weiss, P. T., Gulliver, J. S., & Erickson, A. J. (2008). Cost and pollutant removal of storm-water treatment practices. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, *134*(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(218)
  57. Winston, R. J., Dorsey, J. D., & Hunt, W. F. (2016). Quantifying volume reduction and peak flow mitigation for three bioretention cells in clay soils in northeast Ohio. Science of The Total Environment, *553*, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.081
  58. Zimmerman, R., & Faris, C. (2010). Infrastructure impacts and adaptation challenges. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, *1196*(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05318.x
  59. Gersonius, B., Ashley, R., Pathirana, A., & Zevenbergen, C. (2013). Climate change uncertainty: Building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure. Climatic Change, *116*(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0494-5
  60. Kuichling, E. (1889). The relation between the rainfall and the discharge of sewers in populous districts. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, *20*(1), 1–56.
CONTINUE EXPLORING

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Explore other published research by the authors of this article.