Political Science Law
OPEN ACCESS
International Legal Standards and Their Relationship with National Legislation Regarding the Protection of Individual Rights in Pre-Trial Proceedings
DOI
Crossref DOI
10.37547/tajpslc/Volume08Issue05-20
tajpslc
2026
VOL. 8
/ NO. 05
MAY
RESEARCH OVERVIEW
Abstract
The article examines international standards of justice in terms of their impact on the national legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan regulating the legal status of an individual at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings. Particular attention is paid to the issues of a certain superiority of one party in this process—the state bodies conducting criminal prosecution—over the other party, the person being held criminally liable.
RESEARCH TOPICS
Keywords
International standards
pre-trial proceedings
individual rights
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP
References
- European Court of Human Rights. Deweer v. Belgium. Judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A No. 35, § 46. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-57469
- Committee Against Torture. Final remarks on the fifth periodic report of Uzbekistan. - UN Document CAT/C/UZB/CO/5 (2020). https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/concluding-observations/catcuzbco5-committee-against-torture-concluding-observations
- Human Rights Committee. General Comment No 32 (2007): Article 14: Equality before courts and tribunals and the right of everyone to a fair trial. - UN Document CCPR/C/GC/32, paragraph 32. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/606075?v=pdf
- Human Rights Committee. Final remarks on the fifth periodic report of Uzbekistan. Human Rights Committee. General comment No 35 (2014): Article 9 (freedom and personal inviolability). - UN Document CCPR/C/GC/35, paragraphs 3, 5. - UN Document CCPR/C/UZB/CO/5 (May 1, 2020). https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/concluding-observations/ccprcuzbco5-human-rights-committee-concluding-observations-fifth
- Damashka M.R. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. - New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. - P. 16-46. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300051193/the-faces-of-justice-and-state-authority/
- Dehaghani R. Vulnerability in Police Detention: Police Decision-Making and the Appropriate Adult Safeguard. - London: Routledge, 2019. — P. 24–41. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315105925/vulnerability-police-custody-roxanna-dehaghani
- Fineman M.A. The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition // Yale Journal of Law and Feminism. - 2008. - Vol. 20. — No. 1. - P. 1-23. https://openyls.law.yale.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/f23fa6fb-d926-43dd-8627-d880c7337a8a/content
- Hodgson J.S. The Metamorphosis of Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. - P. 96-118. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3625869
- Legg A. The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. - P. 17-35. https://academic.oup.com/book/6548/chapter-abstract/150483823?redirectedFrom=fulltext
- Letsas G. Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. - 2006. - Vol. 26. - No. 4. — P. 705–732. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4494564
- Packer H.L. Two Models of the Criminal Process // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. - 1964. - Vol. 113. - No. 1. - P. 1-68. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Two-Models-of-the-Criminal-Process-Packer/9cce0de38192ecd60de41fcf9c9147a4a2bc279b
- Summers S.J. Fair Trials: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights. - Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007. — P. 130–142. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27750052
- Trechsel S. Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. - P. 85-90. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/human-rights-in-criminal-proceedings-9780198299363?cc=uz&lang=en&