Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume04Issue03-07

CIVIL LEGAL PROTECTION OF TRADEMARKS IN THE DIGITAL ERA

Z.Babakulov , Doctor of Philosophy in Law (Ph.D) Researcher of Tashkent State University Law (DSc), Uzbekistan

Abstract

The role of online trading is gradually increasing in our lives. Expanding the capabilities of the Internet network allows you to trade in other countries. At the same time, the issue of consumer protection remains unsettled. In some cases, they are unaware that they are purchasing counterfeit products. This, in turn, provides an opportunity for unscrupulous online merchants to gain unjust enrichment. These facts are discussed in detail in this article from a scientific point of view, which is based on past court decisions.

Keywords

Marketplace, administrator, online trading

References

M. Khalifa, V. Liu. Online consumer retention: contingent effects of online shopping habit and online shopping experience // European Journal of Information Systems. - 2007. - T. 16. - No. 6. - P.780.

P. A. Riach, J. Rich Field experiments of discrimination in the market place // The economic journal. - 2002. - T. 112. - No. 483. – P.F480.

A.S. Vorozhevich. Disputes over violations of exclusive rights to trademarks in marketplaces. “Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court”, No. 2 (32), June 2021, - P.133.

Kostyrev A., Shchurenkov N. Counterfeit is a stubborn thing // Kommersant 2019. July 8. No. 117/P.

Danilov D.B. Porokhov M.Yu. Trademark protection in the era of digitalization. Society and law. 2021. No. 2 (76). - P.156.

Hotbeds of counterfeit: Moscow wholesale markets and Youtube bloggers develop trade in illegal goods in Russia. Its volume exceeds 5 trillion rubles. // TiarCenter.com [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://tiarcenter. com/counterfeit/ (date of access: 01/06/2021).

Vopilov, Yu. Test purchase of BrandMonitor: 7 out of 10 goods in the network are counterfeit // BrandMonitor.ru [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://brandmonitor.ru/materials/kontrolnaya-zakupka-brandmonitor-7-iz-10-tovarov-v-setikontrafakt/ (date of access: 01/03/2021)

Long C. Trademarks and Unfair Competition // The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 2: Private and Commercial Law. – 2017. – P.220.

Salnikova A.V., Kudimova Yu.A. Cotrafact to the marketplace on the example of "Wideberry": problem statement. Bulletin of the University No. 2, 2021. - P.118.

A.S. Vorozhevich. Disputes over violations of exclusive rights to trademarks in marketplaces. “Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court”, No. 2 (32), June 2021, - P.136.

Minutes No. 10 of the Meeting of the Working Group of the Scientific Advisory Council at the Court for Intellectual Property Rights April 22, 2015 // http://ipcmagazine.ru/official-cronicle/protocol-10-of-the-meeting-of-the- scientific-advisory-council-at-thecourt-for-intellectual-property-right

Minutes No. 10 of the Meeting of the Working Group of the Scientific Advisory Council at the Court for Intellectual Property Rights April 22, 2015 // http://ipcmagazine.ru/official-cronicle/protocol-10-of-the-meeting-of-the- scientific-advisory-council-at-thecourt-for-intellectual-property-right

Tiffany No.04 Civ. 4607 at 1.

1 SA Louis Vuitton Malletier v eBay Inc and eBay International [2010] E.T.M.R.10.

Hermes International v Cindy Feitz and eBay, RG No.06/02604.

A.S. Vorozhevich. Disputes over violations of exclusive rights to trademarks in marketplaces. “Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court”, No. 2 (32), June 2021, - P.139-140.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Z.Babakulov. (2022). CIVIL LEGAL PROTECTION OF TRADEMARKS IN THE DIGITAL ERA. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 4(03), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume04Issue03-07