Articles
| Open Access |
DOI: The Necessity Of Piercing Corporate Veil Doctrine In Uzbek Corporate Law
Utkirbek Kholmirzaev , Lecturer Of Tashkent State University Of Law, UzbekistanAbstract
This article discusses the distribution of liability risks of shareholderss and other controlling persons on corporate liabilities. Given the analysis of ex post and ex ante model of control over distribution of risks of civil turnover participants in common law and continental legal traditions. Also, considered problems of shareholders' liability on obligations of corporations in the Republic of Uzbekistan. A shareholder shall be held liable on a subsidiary basis for the obligations of the legal entity in case of insolvency, as a result of the member's wrongful acts. However, some mechanisms of such liability do not allow to resolve the issue fairly.
Keywords
Piercing corporate veil, shareholder
References
Pickering, Murray. (2011). THE COMPANY AS A SEPARATE LEGAL ENTITY. The Modern Law Review. 31. 481 – 511.
Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier, "The End of History for Corporate Law" (2001). Faculty Scholarship Series. 5061. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/5061
Vandekerckhove K. Piercing the Corporate Veil. N.Y., 2007. P. 11, 79.
Sukhanov E.A. Comparative corporate law. M. Statut 2014.S. 86.
Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated March 20, 2019 No. ЗРУ-531 - National database of legislation, March 21, 2019, No. 03/19/531/2799.
(https://lex.uz/docs/4249870?ONDATE=21.03.2019%2000#4253389 (stand: 18.04.2020).
Sukhanov E.A. Comparative corporate law. M. Statut 2014.S. 86.
Vandekerckhove K. Piercing the Corporate Veil. N.Y., 2007. P. 11, 11.
Fuқarolic ҳuқuқi: Darslik. I cm. I.B. Zokirov; Masul muҳarrir: Ҳ.Raҳmonulov: Қayta ishlangan va tўldirilgan beshinchi nashr. –T .: TDYuI nashrieti, 2009. 611 bet.
Commentary on the Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan vol.1 (part one). Ministry of the Republic of Uzbekistan. - T .: "Vector Press", 2010. - 768 p. - (professional comments). 128-129.
Egorov A.V., Usacheva K.A. The doctrine of removing the corporate cover as a tool for distributing risks between members of the corporation and other subjects of turnover // Bulletin of Civil Law, 2014, No. 1 ("Consultant Plus").
BGH, Urteil vom 16. 7. 2007 – II ZR 3/04 – "TRIHOTEL"; OLG Rostock (lexetius.com/2007,1959) https://lexetius.com/2007,1959 (stand: 12.04.2020).
Oh P.B. Veil-Piercing // Texas Law Review. 2010. Vol. 89. Р. 90.
Carsten Alting, Piercing the Corporate Veil in American and German Law - Liability of Individuals and Entities: A Comparative View, 2 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 187 (1994).
Charles Zhen Qu* and Björn Ahl. Lowering the Corporate Veil in Germany: a case note on BGH 16 July 2007 (Trihotel). (2008). Oxford U Comparative L Forum 4 at ouclf.law.ox.ac.uk
Decision of the Mirabad Interdistrict Civil Court in case No. 2-1002-2006 / 91 (1-1388 / 20) dated 09.03.2020: https://public.sud.uz/api/file/civil/1530425 (stand: 13.04.2020)
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2020 The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.