This study examines whether corp8rate governance mechanisms influence the market valuation of Nigerian deposit money banks. Focusing on CEO duality and board diligence (board size, meeting frequency, and independence), the study employs a panel research design using secondary annual report data to estimate the relationship between governance structure and firm value, proxied by market price per share. The results indicate that CEO duality has a significant positive association with firm value, suggesting that unified leadership was not penalized by investors during the period studied. Board diligence proxies, especially board size and meeting frequency, also show significant positive effects, demonstrating that markets reward observable oversight intensity. Board independence, however, did not exhibit a strong valuation effect, implying that formal separation without enacted control is not priced. The overall model fit confirms that governance is not incidental but meaningfully predictive of value in the banking sector. The findings contribute to the governance–value discourse by showing that the market distinguishes between enacted and symbolic governance and that duality outcomes are context-contingent rather than theoretically fixed

Corporate governance, CEO duality, Board diligence, Firm value, Nigerian banks Technologies, CO2 Removal, Sustainable Solutions

Adetuji, A., Aymen, S., & Ibrahim, L. (2011). Financial ratios and market valuation in emerging equity markets. Journal of Finance and Economics, 6(3), 44–57.

Al-Amarneh, A. (2014). Corporate governance, ownership structure and bank performance in Jordan. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(6), 192–202.

Arora, A., & Sharma, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing economies. Corporate Governance, 16(2), 420–436.

Assenga, M., Aly, D., & Linge, C. (2018). Board governance and firm value in African listed firms. African Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(2), 177–198.

Barisua, N., Emenike, K., & Jones, S. (2012). Board characteristics and corporate performance in Nigerian firms. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(8), 140–146.

Chineme, A., Okafor, C., & Nwosu, C. (2018). CEO duality and value relevance in emerging markets. International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 12(4), 55–67.

Dalton, D., Daily, C., Ellstrand, A., & Johnson, J. (2007). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.

Eluyela, D., Akintimehin, O., Okere, W., Akinlo, O., & Oladipo, O. (2018). Board meeting frequency and financial performance. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(2), 574–578.

Falaye, M. (2015). Governance failures and market instability in Nigerian banks. Nigerian Journal of Banking and Finance, 7(1), 99–117.

Gill, A., & Mathur, N. (2011). The impact of board characteristics on firm performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(21), 121–127.

Hashim, H., & Rahman, F. (2017). Independent directors and earnings quality. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(2), 228–247.

Johl, S., Kaur, S., & Cooper, B. (2015). Board structure and firm value in Asia. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 305–320.

Larcker, D., & Rusticus, T. (2010). Corporate governance and equity valuation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2), 132–157.

Okwara, E., & Okoro, U. (2017). Governance disclosure and valuation effects in Nigerian banks. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 3(5), 10–23.

Shahwan, T. (2015). The effects of corporate governance on financial performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(1), 250–265.

Urhoghide, R., & Omolaye, O. (2017). Board diligence and financial disclosure in Nigerian firms. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 9(7), 82–90.

Yin, X. (2013). Market price as a signal of firm fundamentals. Review of Financial Markets, 5(1), 42–63.