This article examines the issue of choosing between state courts and arbitration institutions for resolving commercial disputes arising in business activities, with a particular focus on the Republic of Kazakhstan. Based on a comparative analysis, four key criteria are investigated: the amount in dispute, the nature and essence of the conflict, the time and quality of proceedings, and the impartiality of the decision rendered. It is concluded that state courts offer lower direct costs (such as court fees), but are characterized by a relatively lengthy process due to workload and multiple layers of jurisdiction. In contrast, arbitration provides the parties with procedural flexibility, the ability to select arbitrators, and often resolves disputes more quickly, although it requires payment of arbitration fees and may be vulnerable to the risk of "pocket" adjudications. In conclusion, it is emphasized that under both Kazakhstani and international practice, entrepreneurs should take into account the specific features of their dispute and carefully assess the reliability of arbitration in advance. A combination of analysis of national legislation, international legal norms (the New York Convention, the UNCITRAL Model Law), and examples from practical cases allows for the formulation of practical recommendations on selecting the optimal mechanism for resolving commercial conflicts.

state court, commercial arbitration, arbitration fee, court fee, impartiality, corruption risks

Constitutional Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 25, 2000 No. 132-II "On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan." (2000).

Lanshakova, A. Yu. Advantages of Resolving Disputes in International Commercial Arbitration // Vestnik of Omsk University. Series "Law." No. 1 (34). 2013. pp. 166–169.

Baykov, A. Mechanism of Legal Regulation of the Resolution of International Commercial Disputes: Issues of Theory and Law Enforcement Practice // Baltic Legal Journal. 2015. No. 2. pp. 15–33.

Davydov, R. Kh. Legal Analysis of the Sources of Legal Regulation of International Commercial Arbitration // Skif. Issues of Student Science. No. 3 (19). 2018. pp. 80–86.

Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 25, 2017 No. 120-VI "On Taxes and Other Mandatory Payments to the Budget (Tax Code)." (2017).

Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated April 8, 2016 No. 488-V "On Arbitration." (2016).

Krupko, S. I. Procedural Issues in Resolving Disputes Arising from Supply Contracts between Russian and Chinese Organizations: The Experience of MCOAS at the RF Chamber of Commerce and Industry // Property Relations in the Russian Federation. No. 6 (213). 2019. pp. 61–67.

Puchinkin, D. A., Kudryavtseva, L. V. Carrier Liability under a Contract for International Maritime Cargo Transport // In: Scientific Support for the Agro-Industrial Complex. Collection of Articles from the 75th Scientific-Practical Conference of Students on the Results of R&D in 2019. Responsible for publication: A. G. Koshchaev. 2020. pp. 1300–1302.

Kuklina, V. E., Kudryavtseva, L. V. Current Issues in Law Enforcement Practice for Protecting Entrepreneurs' Rights in the Means of Individualization of Goods, Works, and Services // In: Labor and Entrepreneurial Relations: Modern Trends in Legal Regulation and Law Enforcement. Collection of Articles from the All-Russian Student Scientific-Practical Conference. 2016. pp. 182–186.

UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985).

New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. (1958).

Kazachenok, S. Y. The Impact of the Global Sanctions Policy on Arbitrating by International Commercial Arbitration Courts: Risks and Prospects for the Russian Federation // Legal Concept = Pravovaya Paradigma. – 2020. – Vol. 19. – No. 1.